
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Bug de détection d’ogg
22 mars 2013, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : français
Type : Video
Autres articles (65)
-
Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond
5 septembre 2013, parCertains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;
-
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir -
Ajouter des informations spécifiques aux utilisateurs et autres modifications de comportement liées aux auteurs
12 avril 2011, parLa manière la plus simple d’ajouter des informations aux auteurs est d’installer le plugin Inscription3. Il permet également de modifier certains comportements liés aux utilisateurs (référez-vous à sa documentation pour plus d’informations).
Il est également possible d’ajouter des champs aux auteurs en installant les plugins champs extras 2 et Interface pour champs extras.
Sur d’autres sites (12251)
-
avfilter/x86/vf_blend : add 16 bit version for BLEND_SIMPLE, phoenix, difference...
17 février 2018, par Martin Vignali -
What's the difference with crf and qp in ffmpeg ?
12 novembre 2024, par NovaI read https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/H.264 about h264 encoding and discovered
qp
.

Q1 : What are the differences with crf and qp ?

Q2 : Is it better to use qp over crf overall, or is it only if for using qp 0 for best lossless ?

Q3 : Does qp have a known sensible setting if it's preferred ? So far, I know crf has the default value of 23 while 18 is a sensible preferred increase in quality, although I don't understand why 18 wouldn't be default if better sensible lossless.

Q4 : Would changing either of them cause incompatibility with non-ffmpeg players or just qp ?

I'm converting from webm to mp4.


I was going to test crf 23 and 18 and pick which is best but I can't seem to find any concrete information on this comparison or about
qp
.

-
What is the difference between different fadein/fadeout curves in ffmpeg ?
16 août 2018, par siods333333Here is the list of possible curves for
afade
andacrossfade
filters from here https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#afade-1tri
select triangular, linear slope (default)
qsin
select quarter of sine wave
hsin
select half of sine wave
esin
select exponential sine wave
log
select logarithmic
ipar
select inverted parabola
qua
select quadratic
cub
select cubic
squ
select square root
cbr
select cubic root
par
select parabola
exp
select exponential
iqsin
select inverted quarter of sine wave
ihsin
select inverted half of sine wave
dese
select double-exponential seat
desi
select double-exponential sigmoidHere is the code for them, from
libavfilter/af_afade.c
:switch (curve) {
case QSIN:
gain = sin(gain * M_PI / 2.0);
break;
case IQSIN:
/* 0.6... = 2 / M_PI */
gain = 0.6366197723675814 * asin(gain);
break;
case ESIN:
gain = 1.0 - cos(M_PI / 4.0 * (CUBE(2.0*gain - 1) + 1));
break;
case HSIN:
gain = (1.0 - cos(gain * M_PI)) / 2.0;
break;
case IHSIN:
/* 0.3... = 1 / M_PI */
gain = 0.3183098861837907 * acos(1 - 2 * gain);
break;
case EXP:
/* -11.5... = 5*ln(0.1) */
gain = exp(-11.512925464970227 * (1 - gain));
break;
case LOG:
gain = av_clipd(1 + 0.2 * log10(gain), 0, 1.0);
break;
case PAR:
gain = 1 - sqrt(1 - gain);
break;
case IPAR:
gain = (1 - (1 - gain) * (1 - gain));
break;
case QUA:
gain *= gain;
break;
case CUB:
gain = CUBE(gain);
break;
case SQU:
gain = sqrt(gain);
break;
case CBR:
gain = cbrt(gain);
break;
case DESE:
gain = gain <= 0.5 ? cbrt(2 * gain) / 2: 1 - cbrt(2 * (1 - gain)) / 2;
break;
case DESI:
gain = gain <= 0.5 ? CUBE(2 * gain) / 2: 1 - CUBE(2 * (1 - gain)) / 2;
break;
}How do they look like ? How do they sound like ? Which one is recommended for fadein+fadeout and crossfade ? Personally I’m just trying to avoid audio clicks, maybe crossfade is a bit of an overkill here.
Related link : http://manual.audacityteam.org/man/fade_and_crossfade.html . Not sure how audacity names translate into ffmpeg names though.