Recherche avancée

Médias (3)

Mot : - Tags -/pdf

Autres articles (57)

  • Mise à jour de la version 0.1 vers 0.2

    24 juin 2013, par

    Explications des différents changements notables lors du passage de la version 0.1 de MediaSPIP à la version 0.3. Quelles sont les nouveautés
    Au niveau des dépendances logicielles Utilisation des dernières versions de FFMpeg (>= v1.2.1) ; Installation des dépendances pour Smush ; Installation de MediaInfo et FFprobe pour la récupération des métadonnées ; On n’utilise plus ffmpeg2theora ; On n’installe plus flvtool2 au profit de flvtool++ ; On n’installe plus ffmpeg-php qui n’est plus maintenu au (...)

  • Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond

    5 septembre 2013, par

    Certains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;

  • Ecrire une actualité

    21 juin 2013, par

    Présentez les changements dans votre MédiaSPIP ou les actualités de vos projets sur votre MédiaSPIP grâce à la rubrique actualités.
    Dans le thème par défaut spipeo de MédiaSPIP, les actualités sont affichées en bas de la page principale sous les éditoriaux.
    Vous pouvez personnaliser le formulaire de création d’une actualité.
    Formulaire de création d’une actualité Dans le cas d’un document de type actualité, les champs proposés par défaut sont : Date de publication ( personnaliser la date de publication ) (...)

Sur d’autres sites (8233)

  • why ffmpeg starts many processes

    29 octobre 2020, par james

    I have a doubt about the functioning of the ffmpeg program, I noticed that after starting the program on a 4gb memory raspberry pi4 many processes are started, is it normal or is there something wrong with my program ? I remember that on an amazon ec2 instance by controlling with htop only one process was created

    


    Code I used

    


    from subprocess import Popen

ffmpeg_process = Popen(["ffmpeg", "-hide_banner", "-loglevel", "panic", "-y", "-i", "./video/video1.mp4",
                        "-vcodec", "h264", "-acodec", "mp3", "./video/video2.mp4"],
                        start_new_session=True)

ffmpeg_process.wait()


    


    enter image description here

    


  • FFMPEG H264 with custom overlay per frame

    4 octobre 2020, par La bla bla

    We have a stream that is stored in the cloud (Amazon S3) as individual H264 frames. The frames are stored as framexxxxxx.264, the numbering doesn't start from 0 but rather from some larger number, say 1000 (so, frame001000.264)

    


    The goal is to create a mp4 clip which is either timelapse or just faster for inspection and other checking (much faster, compressing around 3 hours of video down to < 20 minutes), this also requires we overlay the frame number (the filename) on the frame itself

    &#xA;

    At first I was creating a timelapse by pulling from S3 only the keyframes (i-frames ? still rather new to codecs & stuff) and overlaying the filename on them and saving as png (which probably isn't needed, but that's what I did) using (this command is used inside a python script)

    &#xA;

    ffmpeg -y -i {h264_name} -vf \"scale=1920:-1, &#xA;drawtext=fontfile=/usr/share/fonts/truetype/ubuntu-font-family/Ubuntu-B.ttf:fontsize=34:text={txt}:fontcolor=white:x=50:y=50:bordercolor=black:borderw=2\" &#xA;-c:a copy -pix_fmt yuv420p {basename}.png&#xA;

    &#xA;

    after this I combined all the frames by using python to convert the lowest numbered frame to 0.png and incrementing (so it would be continuous, because I only used keyframes the numbers originally weren't sequential) and running

    &#xA;

    ffmpeg -y -f image2 -i %d.png -r {self.params.fps} -vcodec libx264 -crf {self.params.crf} -pix_fmt yuv420p {out_file}&#xA;

    &#xA;

    and this worked great, but the difference between keyframes was too long to allow for proper inspection

    &#xA;

    so now for the question(s)

    &#xA;

    since I know frames that are not keyframes (p-frames ?) can't be used alone by ffmpeg, the method of overlaying the file name and converting it to png (or keep as h264, same thing) won't work, or at least, I couldn't find a way for it to work, maybe there's a way to specify a frame's keyframe ?, how can one overlay the filename (and not the frame number as shown here for example)

    &#xA;

    Also, is it possible to skip some p-frames between the keyframes ? (so if a keyframe is every 30 frames, we would take a keyframe, a frame 15 frames later, and next another keyframe)

    &#xA;

    I thought about using ffmpeg's pipe option to feed it with the files as they're being downloaded, but I'm not sure if I can specify drawtext this way

    &#xA;

    Also, if there's another alternative that can achieve that (at first I was converting to png, using python and OpenCV to add the filename and then merging the pngs to mp4, but then I found drawtext can do that in a single command so I used it)

    &#xA;

  • Merging input Streams with nodejs/ffmpeg

    14 septembre 2020, par jAndy

    I'm creating a very basic and rudimentary Video-Web-Chat. On the client side, I'm going to use a simple getUserMedia API call to capture the webcam data and send video-data as data-blob to my server.

    &#xA;

    From There, I'm planning to either use the fluent-ffmpeg library or just spawn ffmpeg myself and pipe that raw data to ffmpeg, which in turn, does some magic and pushes that out as HLS stream to an Amazon AWS Service (for instance), which then gets actually displayed on a Web Browser for all participating people in the video chat.

    &#xA;

    So far, I think all of this should be fairly easy to implement, but I keep my head spinning around the question, how I can create a "combined" or "merged" frame and stream, so the output HLS data from my server to the distributing cloud service has only to be one combined data stream to receive.

    &#xA;

    If there are 3 people in that video chat, my server receives 3 data streams from those clients and combines these data streams (from the individual web-cam data sources) into one output stream.

    &#xA;

    How could that be accomplished ?&#xA;Can I "create" a new frame with ffmpeg, so to speak ? I would be very thankful if anybody could give me a heads up here, maybe I'm thinking in a complete wrong direction.

    &#xA;

    Another question which arises to me is, if I really can just "dump" any data, which I'm receiving from a binary blob created from getUserMedia or MultiStreamRecorder to ffmpeg or if I have to specify somewhere and somehow the exact codecs being used etc.?

    &#xA;