
Recherche avancée
Médias (9)
-
Stereo master soundtrack
17 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Octobre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Elephants Dream - Cover of the soundtrack
17 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Octobre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Image
-
#7 Ambience
16 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Juin 2015
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#6 Teaser Music
16 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#5 End Title
16 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#3 The Safest Place
16 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
Autres articles (96)
-
MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version
25 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...) -
Multilang : améliorer l’interface pour les blocs multilingues
18 février 2011, parMultilang est un plugin supplémentaire qui n’est pas activé par défaut lors de l’initialisation de MediaSPIP.
Après son activation, une préconfiguration est mise en place automatiquement par MediaSPIP init permettant à la nouvelle fonctionnalité d’être automatiquement opérationnelle. Il n’est donc pas obligatoire de passer par une étape de configuration pour cela. -
Use, discuss, criticize
13 avril 2011, parTalk to people directly involved in MediaSPIP’s development, or to people around you who could use MediaSPIP to share, enhance or develop their creative projects.
The bigger the community, the more MediaSPIP’s potential will be explored and the faster the software will evolve.
A discussion list is available for all exchanges between users.
Sur d’autres sites (12128)
-
Why does the frame count change when scaling with FFmpeg ?
22 octobre 2016, par ajmicekI use this to scale 1920x1080 H.264 videos :
ffmpeg -i IMG_1438.MOV -threads 2 -vf scale=-2:600 IMG_1438_scaledTo600.MOV
And it works great ! But here is my question : most of the time, the frame rate stays exactly the same between the original file and the scaled file. For example :
$ mediainfo -F IMG_1426.MOV | grep Frame\ rate
Frame rate : 29.970
Frame rate : 29.970 FPS
Frame rate mode : VFR
Frame rate mode : Variable
Frame rate : 29.970
Frame rate : 29.970 (29970/1000) FPS
$ mediainfo -F IMG_1426_scaledTo600.MOV | grep Frame\ rate
Frame rate : 29.970
Frame rate : 29.970 FPS
Frame rate mode : CFR
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 29.970
Frame rate : 29.970 (30000/1001) FPSBut sometimes, the frame rate increases dramatically :
$ mediainfo -F IMG_1438.MOV | grep Frame\ rate
Frame rate : 25.044
Frame rate : 25.044 FPS
Frame rate mode : VFR
Frame rate mode : Variable
Frame rate : 25.044
Frame rate : 25.044 FPS
$ mediainfo -F IMG_1438_scaledTo600.MOV | grep Frame\ rate
Frame rate : 120.000
Frame rate : 120.000 FPS
Frame rate mode : CFR
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 120.000
Frame rate : 120.000 FPSWhat should I know about FFmpeg or libx264 or libswscale that will help me understand why this happens ? (Hoping to hear from LordNeckbeard, in particular).
mediainfo IMG_1438.MOV --Full
outputs :General
Count : 327
Count of stream of this kind : 1
Kind of stream : General
Kind of stream : General
Stream identifier : 0
Count of video streams : 1
Count of audio streams : 1
OtherCount : 2
Video_Format_List : AVC
Video_Format_WithHint_List : AVC
Codecs Video : AVC
Audio_Format_List : AAC
Audio_Format_WithHint_List : AAC
Audio codecs : AAC LC
Complete name : IMG_1438.MOV
File name : IMG_1438
File extension : MOV
Format : MPEG-4
Format : MPEG-4
Format/Extensions usually used : mp4 m4v m4a m4b m4p 3gpp 3gp 3gpp2 3g2 k3g jpm jpx mqv ismv isma f4v
Commercial name : MPEG-4
Format profile : QuickTime
Internet media type : video/mp4
Codec ID : qt
Codec ID : qt 0000.00 (qt )
Codec ID/Url : http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html
CodecID_Version : 0000.00
CodecID_Compatible : qt
Codec : MPEG-4
Codec : MPEG-4
Codec/Extensions usually used : mp4 m4v m4a m4b m4p 3gpp 3gp 3gpp2 3g2 k3g jpm jpx mqv ismv isma f4v
File size : 113990140
File size : 109 MiB
File size : 109 MiB
File size : 109 MiB
File size : 109 MiB
File size : 108.7 MiB
Duration : 52268
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 00:00:52.268
Duration : 00:00:52:09
Duration : 00:00:52.268 (00:00:52:09)
Overall bit rate : 17447026
Overall bit rate : 17.4 Mb/s
Frame rate : 25.044
Frame rate : 25.044 FPS
Frame count : 1309
Stream size : 56670
Stream size : 55.3 KiB (0%)
Stream size : 55 KiB
Stream size : 55 KiB
Stream size : 55.3 KiB
Stream size : 55.34 KiB
Stream size : 55.3 KiB (0%)
Proportion of this stream : 0.00050
HeaderSize : 28
DataSize : 113966271
FooterSize : 23841
IsStreamable : No
Encoded date : UTC 2016-10-08 22:51:19
Tagged date : UTC 2016-10-08 22:52:12
File last modification date : UTC 2016-10-08 22:51:19
File last modification date (local) : 2016-10-08 17:51:19
Writing library : Apple QuickTime
Writing library : Apple QuickTime
Encoded_Library_Name : Apple QuickTime
com.apple.quicktime.make : Apple
com.apple.quicktime.model : iPhone 5
com.apple.quicktime.software : 10.0.2
com.apple.quicktime.creationdate : 2016-10-08T17:51:19-0500
Video
Count : 334
Count of stream of this kind : 1
Kind of stream : Video
Kind of stream : Video
Stream identifier : 0
StreamOrder : 0
ID : 1
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format/Url : http://developers.videolan.org/x264.html
Commercial name : AVC
Format profile : High@L4.1
Format settings : CABAC / 1 Ref Frames
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 1
Format settings, ReFrames : 1 frame
Internet media type : video/H264
Codec ID : avc1
Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
Codec ID/Url : http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html
Codec : AVC
Codec : AVC
Codec/Family : AVC
Codec/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Codec/Url : http://developers.videolan.org/x264.html
Codec/CC : avc1
Codec profile : High@L4.1
Codec settings : CABAC / 1 Ref Frames
Codec settings, CABAC : Yes
Codec_Settings_RefFrames : 1
Duration : 52268
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 00:00:52.268
Duration : 00:00:52:09
Duration : 00:00:52.268 (00:00:52:09)
Bit rate : 17375530
Bit rate : 17.4 Mb/s
Width : 1920
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1080
Height : 1 080 pixels
Stored_Height : 1088
Sampled_Width : 1920
Sampled_Height : 1080
Pixel aspect ratio : 1.000
Display aspect ratio : 1.778
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Rotation : 90.000
Rotation : 90°
Frame rate mode : VFR
Frame rate mode : Variable
Frame rate : 25.044
Frame rate : 25.044 FPS
Minimum frame rate : 23.077
Minimum frame rate : 23.077 FPS
Maximum frame rate : 30.000
Maximum frame rate : 30.000 FPS
Frame count : 1309
Resolution : 8
Resolution : 8 bits
Colorimetry : 4:2:0
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Scan type : Progressive
Interlacement : PPF
Interlacement : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.335
Stream size : 113523046
Stream size : 108 MiB (100%)
Stream size : 108 MiB
Stream size : 108 MiB
Stream size : 108 MiB
Stream size : 108.3 MiB
Stream size : 108 MiB (100%)
Proportion of this stream : 0.99590
Title : Core Media Video
Encoded date : UTC 2016-10-08 22:51:19
Tagged date : UTC 2016-10-08 22:52:12
Color range : Limited
colour_description_present : Yes
Color primaries : BT.709
Transfer characteristics : BT.709
Matrix coefficients : BT.709
Audio
Count : 272
Count of stream of this kind : 1
Kind of stream : Audio
Kind of stream : Audio
Stream identifier : 0
StreamOrder : 1
ID : 2
ID : 2
Format : AAC
Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
Commercial name : AAC
Format profile : LC
Codec ID : 40
Codec : AAC LC
Codec : AAC LC
Codec/Family : AAC
Codec/CC : 40
Duration : 52268
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 00:00:52.268
Duration : 00:00:52:15
Duration : 00:00:52.268 (00:00:52:15)
Source duration : 52338
Source duration : 52 s 338 ms
Source duration : 52 s 338 ms
Source duration : 52 s 338 ms
Source duration : 00:00:52.338
Bit rate mode : CBR
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 64000
Bit rate : 64.0 kb/s
Channel(s) : 1
Channel(s) : 1 channel
Channel positions : Front: C
Channel positions : 1/0/0
ChannelLayout : C
Samples per frame : 1024
Sampling rate : 44100
Sampling rate : 44.1 kHz
Samples count : 2305019
Frame rate : 43.066
Frame rate : 43.066 FPS (1024 spf)
Frame count : 2251
Source frame count : 2254
Compression mode : Lossy
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 410424
Stream size : 401 KiB (0%)
Stream size : 401 KiB
Stream size : 401 KiB
Stream size : 401 KiB
Stream size : 400.8 KiB
Stream size : 401 KiB (0%)
Proportion of this stream : 0.00360
Source stream size : 410894
Source stream size : 401 KiB (0%)
Source stream size : 401 KiB
Source stream size : 401 KiB
Source stream size : 401 KiB
Source stream size : 401.3 KiB
Source stream size : 401 KiB (0%)
Source_StreamSize_Proportion : 0.00360
Title : Core Media Audio
Encoded date : UTC 2016-10-08 22:51:19
Tagged date : UTC 2016-10-08 22:52:12
Other #1
Count : 112
Count of stream of this kind : 2
Kind of stream : Other
Kind of stream : Other
Stream identifier : 0
Stream identifier : 1
Type : meta
Duration : 52268
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 00:00:52.268
Duration : 00:00:52.268
Frame count : 6
Bit rate mode : VBR
Other #2
Count : 112
Count of stream of this kind : 2
Kind of stream : Other
Kind of stream : Other
Stream identifier : 1
Stream identifier : 2
Type : meta
Duration : 52268
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 52 s 268 ms
Duration : 00:00:52.268
Duration : 00:00:52.268
Frame count : 1
Bit rate mode : CBRand
ffprobe IMG_1438.MOV
outputs :ffprobe version 3.1.3 Copyright (c) 2007-2016 the FFmpeg developers
built with Apple LLVM version 7.3.0 (clang-703.0.31)
configuration: --prefix=/usr/local/Cellar/ffmpeg/3.1.3 --enable-shared --enable-pthreads --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --enable-hardcoded-tables --enable-avresample --cc=clang --host-cflags= --host-ldflags= --enable-opencl --enable-libx264 --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libxvid --disable-lzma --enable-vda
libavutil 55. 28.100 / 55. 28.100
libavcodec 57. 48.101 / 57. 48.101
libavformat 57. 41.100 / 57. 41.100
libavdevice 57. 0.101 / 57. 0.101
libavfilter 6. 47.100 / 6. 47.100
libavresample 3. 0. 0 / 3. 0. 0
libswscale 4. 1.100 / 4. 1.100
libswresample 2. 1.100 / 2. 1.100
libpostproc 54. 0.100 / 54. 0.100
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'IMG_1438.MOV':
Metadata:
major_brand : qt
minor_version : 0
compatible_brands: qt
creation_time : 2016-10-08 22:51:19
com.apple.quicktime.make: Apple
com.apple.quicktime.model: iPhone 5
com.apple.quicktime.software: 10.0.2
com.apple.quicktime.creationdate: 2016-10-08T17:51:19-0500
Duration: 00:00:52.27, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 17446 kb/s
Stream #0:0(und): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(tv, bt709), 1920x1080, 17375 kb/s, 25.04 fps, 120 tbr, 600 tbn, 1200 tbc (default)
Metadata:
rotate : 90
creation_time : 2016-10-08 22:51:19
handler_name : Core Media Data Handler
encoder : H.264
Side data:
displaymatrix: rotation of -90.00 degrees
Stream #0:1(und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 44100 Hz, mono, fltp, 62 kb/s (default)
Metadata:
creation_time : 2016-10-08 22:51:19
handler_name : Core Media Data Handler
Stream #0:2(und): Data: none (mebx / 0x7862656D), 0 kb/s (default)
Metadata:
creation_time : 2016-10-08 22:51:19
handler_name : Core Media Data Handler
Stream #0:3(und): Data: none (mebx / 0x7862656D), 0 kb/s (default)
Metadata:
creation_time : 2016-10-08 22:51:19
handler_name : Core Media Data Handler
Unsupported codec with id 0 for input stream 2
Unsupported codec with id 0 for input stream 3UPDATE
To clarify : my video above, the one with the high framerate (120 FPS) output after scaling, plays perfectly before and after scaling with FFmpeg (no sync issues, and 120 FPS is only about 14% larger in file size), I am simply trying to understand why this increase in framerate happens (just a little beyond Mulvya’s note that the framerate stored in the container is wrong).From a programming perspective, the initial issue I ran into was that I was using
frame=
from FFmpeg’s sterr console output to determine progress, which reports erroneous results when the frame count increases dramatically on output ("I’m 372% done encoding ?!") ; I have since read another stackoverflow answer and changed my code to usetime=
, which appears to be a more robust way for me to display FFmpeg progress. (Also, there is FFmpeg’s-progress
option, of course).Improving on the original command
My new command to scale, preserve a useful framerate, and optimize threads :
ffmpeg -i IMG_1438.MOV -vf scale=-2:600 -r 30 -vsync 0 IMG_1438_scaledTo600.MOV
Where
30
is the "Maximum frame rate" frommediainfo
.Thanks to help in the comments, I now know I do not fully understand FFmpeg’s use of three different time bases for timestamps :
tbn
,tbc
, andtbr
.
They were explained by Robert Swain in 2009 and his explanation was also used to answer a Stackoverflow question about tbn, tbc, tbr.It sounds to me, as I’m pulling together comments from Mulvya below and Michael Rampe at another forum, that
tbr
is guessed ; it is frequently but not always the best value to use when changing from a variable to a constant frame rate video.Which leaves these 2 questions...
(1)
tbr
is incorrect when "field rate and frame rate" differ ? Does this happen a lot ?
(2) Is-r 30
where30
is the maximum frame rate reported bymediainfo
the best way to do it for most codec/container combinations ? (Or should I only use this method when I am scaling a H.264/MPEG-4 AVC video ?) -
Processing Big Data Problems
8 janvier 2011, par Multimedia Mike — Big DataI’m becoming more interested in big data problems, i.e., extracting useful information out of absurdly sized sets of input data. I know it’s a growing field and there is a lot to read on the subject. But you know how I roll— just think of a problem to solve and dive right in.
Here’s how my adventure unfolded.
The Corpus
I need to run a command line program on a set of files I have collected. This corpus is on the order of 350,000 files. The files range from 7 bytes to 175 MB. Combined, they occupy around 164 GB of storage space.Oh, and said storage space resides on an external, USB 2.0-connected hard drive. Stop laughing.
A file is named according to the SHA-1 hash of its data. The files are organized in a directory hierarchy according to the first 6 hex digits of the SHA-1 hash (e.g., a file named a4d5832f... is stored in a4/d5/83/a4d5832f...). All of this file hash, path, and size information is stored in an SQLite database.
First Pass
I wrote a Python script that read all the filenames from the database, fed them into a pool of worker processes using Python’s multiprocessing module, and wrote some resulting data for each file back to the SQLite database. My Eee PC has a single-core, hyperthreaded Atom which presents 2 CPUs to the system. Thus, 2 worker threads crunched the corpus. It took awhile. It took somewhere on the order of 9 or 10 or maybe even 12 hours. It took long enough that I’m in no hurry to re-run the test and get more precise numbers.At least I extracted my initial set of data from the corpus. Or did I ?
Think About The Future
A few days later, I went back to revisit the data only to notice that the SQLite database was corrupted. To add insult to that bit of injury, the script I had written to process the data was also completely corrupted (overwritten with something unrelated to Python code). BTW, this is was on a RAID brick configured for redundancy. So that’s strike 3 in my personal dealings with RAID technology.I moved the corpus to a different external drive and also verified the files after writing (easy to do since I already had the SHA-1 hashes on record).
The corrupted script was pretty simple to rewrite, even a little better than before. Then I got to re-run it. However, this run was on a faster machine, a hyperthreaded, quad-core beast that exposes 8 CPUs to the system. The reason I wasn’t too concerned about the poor performance with my Eee PC is that I knew I was going to be able to run in on this monster later.
So I let the rewritten script rip. The script gave me little updates regarding its progress. As it did so, I ran some rough calculations and realized that it wasn’t predicted to finish much sooner than it would have if I were running it on the Eee PC.
Limiting Factors
It had been suggested to me that I/O bandwidth of the external USB drive might be a limiting factor. This is when I started to take that idea very seriously.The first idea I had was to move the SQLite database to a different drive. The script records data to the database for every file processed, though it only commits once every 100 UPDATEs, so at least it’s not constantly syncing the disc. I ran before and after tests with a small subset of the corpus and noticed a substantial speedup thanks to this policy chance.
Then I remembered hearing something about "atime" which is access time. Linux filesystems, per default, record the time that a file was last accessed. You can watch this in action by running
'stat <file> ; cat <file> > /dev/null ; stat <file>'
and observe that the "Access" field has been updated to NOW(). This also means that every single file that gets read from the external drive still causes an additional write. To avoid this, I started mounting the external drive with'-o noatime'
which instructs Linux not to record "last accessed" time for files.On the limited subset test, this more than doubled script performance. I then wondered about mounting the external drive as read-only. This had the same performance as noatime. I thought about using both options together but verified that access times are not updated for a read-only filesystem.
A Note On Profiling
Once you start accessing files in Linux, those files start getting cached in RAM. Thus, if you profile, say, reading a gigabyte file from a disk and get 31 MB/sec, and then repeat the same test, you’re likely to see the test complete instantaneously. That’s because the file is already sitting in memory, cached. This is useful in general application use, but not if you’re trying to profile disk performance.Thus, in between runs, do (as root)
'sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'
in order to wipe caches (explained here).Even Better ?
I re-ran the test using these little improvements. Now it takes somewhere around 5 or 6 hours to run.I contrived an artificially large file on the external drive and did some
'dd'
tests to measure what the drive could really do. The drive consistently measured a bit over 31 MB/sec. If I could read and process the data at 30 MB/sec, the script would be done in about 95 minutes.But it’s probably rather unreasonable to expect that kind of transfer rate for lots of smaller files scattered around a filesystem. However, it can’t be that helpful to have 8 different processes constantly asking the HD for 8 different files at any one time.
So I wrote a script called stream-corpus.py which simply fetched all the filenames from the database and loaded the contents of each in turn, leaving the data to be garbage-collected at Python’s leisure. This test completed in 174 minutes, just shy of 3 hours. I computed an average read speed of around 17 MB/sec.
Single-Reader Script
I began to theorize that if I only have one thread reading, performance should improve greatly. To test this hypothesis without having to do a lot of extra work, I cleared the caches and ran stream-corpus.py until'top'
reported that about half of the real memory had been filled with data. Then I let the main processing script loose on the data. As both scripts were using sorted lists of files, they iterated over the filenames in the same order.Result : The processing script tore through the files that had obviously been cached thanks to stream-corpus.py, degrading drastically once it had caught up to the streaming script.
Thus, I was incented to reorganize the processing script just slightly. Now, there is a reader thread which reads each file and stuffs the name of the file into an IPC queue that one of the worker threads can pick up and process. Note that no file data is exchanged between threads. No need— the operating system is already implicitly holding onto the file data, waiting in case someone asks for it again before something needs that bit of RAM. Technically, this approach accesses each file multiple times. But it makes little practical difference thanks to caching.
Result : About 183 minutes to process the complete corpus (which works out to a little over 16 MB/sec).
Why Multiprocess
Is it even worthwhile to bother multithreading this operation ? Monitoring the whole operation via'top'
, most instances of the processing script are barely using any CPU time. Indeed, it’s likely that only one of the worker threads is doing any work most of the time, pulling a file out of the IPC queue as soon the reader thread triggers its load into cache. Right now, the processing is usually pretty quick. There are cases where the processing (external program) might hang (one of the reasons I’m running this project is to find those cases) ; the multiprocessing architecture at least allows other processes to take over until a hanging process is timed out and killed by its monitoring process.Further, the processing is pretty simple now but is likely to get more intensive in future iterations. Plus, there’s the possibility that I might move everything onto a more appropriately-connected storage medium which should help alleviate the bottleneck bravely battled in this post.
There’s also the theoretical possibility that the reader thread could read too far ahead of the processing threads. Obviously, that’s not too much of an issue in the current setup. But to guard against it, the processes could share a variable that tracks the total number of bytes that have been processed. The reader thread adds filesizes to the count while the processing threads subtract file sizes. The reader thread would delay reading more if the number got above a certain threshold.
Leftovers
I wondered if the order of accessing the files mattered. I didn’t write them to the drive in any special order. The drive is formatted with Linux ext3. I ran stream-corpus.py on all the filenames sorted by filename (remember the SHA-1 naming convention described above) and also by sorting them randomly.Result : It helps immensely for the filenames to be sorted. The sorted variant was a little more than twice as fast as the random variant. Maybe it has to do with accessing all the files in a single directory before moving onto another directory.
Further, I have long been under the impression that the best read speed you can expect from USB 2.0 was 27 Mbytes/sec (even though 480 Mbit/sec is bandied about in relation to the spec). This comes from profiling I performed with an external enclosure that supports both USB 2.0 and FireWire-400 (and eSata). FW-400 was able to read the same file at nearly 40 Mbytes/sec that USB 2.0 could only read at 27 Mbytes/sec. Other sources I have read corroborate this number. But this test (using different hardware), achieved over 31 Mbytes/sec.
-
Révision 20021 : retour sur r20020 : il faut tout de meme verifier l’existence d’un champ statut ...
22 novembre 2012, par cedric -+ ajout d’un argument $set dans objet_inserer qui permet d’initialiser certains champs a la creation (exemple d’une cle unique : on ne veut pas passer par une valeur vide car en cas d’insertions concourantes on risque l’echec, ce qui n’est pas le cas si on fournit directement la valeur lors de (...)