Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (100)

  • MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version

    25 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
    The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
    To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
    If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...)

  • Emballe médias : à quoi cela sert ?

    4 février 2011, par

    Ce plugin vise à gérer des sites de mise en ligne de documents de tous types.
    Il crée des "médias", à savoir : un "média" est un article au sens SPIP créé automatiquement lors du téléversement d’un document qu’il soit audio, vidéo, image ou textuel ; un seul document ne peut être lié à un article dit "média" ;

  • HTML5 audio and video support

    13 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
    The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
    For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
    MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...)

Sur d’autres sites (9102)

  • configure : remove Bitrig OS

    31 décembre 2023, par Brad Smith
    configure : remove Bitrig OS
    

    Bitrig has been defunct for 7 years.

    Signed-off-by : Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>
    Signed-off-by : Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao@tencent.com>

    • [DH] configure
  • What is last click attribution ? A beginner’s guide

    10 mars 2024, par Erin

    Imagine you just finished a successful marketing campaign. You reached new highs in campaign revenue. Your conversion was higher than ever. And you did it without dramatically increasing your marketing budget.

    So, you start planning your next campaign with a bigger budget.

    But what do you do ? Where do you invest the extra money ?

    You used several marketing tactics and channels in the last campaign. To solve this problem, you need to track marketing attribution — where you give conversion credit to a channel (or channels) that acted as a touchpoint along the buyer’s journey.

    One of the most popular attribution models is last click attribution.

    In this article, we’ll break down what last click attribution is, its advantages and disadvantages, and examples of how you can use it to gain insights into the marketing strategies driving your growth.

    What is last click attribution ?

    Last click, or last interaction, is a marketing attribution model that seeks to give all credit for a conversion to the final touchpoint in the buyer’s journey. It assumes the customer’s last interaction with your brand (before the sale) was the most influential marketing channel for the conversion decision.

    What is last click attribution?

    Example of last click attribution

    Let’s say a woman named Jill stumbles across a fitness equipment website through an Instagram ad. She explores the website, looking at a few fitness bands and equipment, but she doesn’t buy anything.

    A few days later, Jill was doing a workout but wished she had equipment to use.

    So, she Googles the name of the company she checked out earlier to take a look at the fitness bands it offers. She’s not sure which one to get, but she signs up for a 10% discount by entering her email.

    A few days later, she sees an ad on Facebook and visits the site but exits before purchasing. 

    The next day, Jill gets an email from the store stating that her discount code is expiring. She clicks on the link, plugs in the discount code, and buys a fitness band for $49.99.

    Under the last click attribution model, the fitness company would attribute full credit for the sale to their email campaign while ignoring all other touchpoints (the Instagram ad, Jill’s organic Google search, and the Facebook ad).

    3 advantages of last click attribution

    Last click attribution is one of the most popular methods to credit a conversion. Here are the primary advantages of using it to measure your marketing efforts :

    Advantages of Last Click Attribution

    1. Easiest attribution method for beginners

    If something’s too complicated, many people simply won’t touch it.

    So, when you start diving into attribution, you might want to keep it simple. Fortunately, last click attribution is a wonderful method for beginner marketers to try out. And when you first begin tracking your marketing efforts, it’s one of the easiest methods to grasp. 

    2. It can have more impact on revenue

    Attribution and conversions go hand in hand. But conversions aren’t just about making a sale or generating more revenue. We often need to track the conversions that take place before a sale.

    This could include gaining a new follower on Instagram or capturing an email subscriber with a new lead magnet.

    If you’re trying to attribute why someone converted into a follower or lead, you may want to ditch last click for something else.

    But when you’re looking strictly at revenue-generating conversions, last click can be one of the most impactful methods for giving credit to a conversion.

    3. It helps you understand bottom-of-funnel conversions

    If SEO is your focus, chances are pretty good that you aren’t looking for a direct sale right out of the gate. You likely want to build your authority, inform and educate your audience, and then maybe turn them into a lead.

    However, when your primary focus isn’t generating traffic or leads but turning your leads into customers, then you’re focused on the bottom of your sales funnel.

    Last click can be helpful to use in bottom-of-funnel (BoFu) conversions since it often means following a paid ad or sales email that allows you to convert your warm audience member.

    If you’re strictly after revenue, you may not need to pay as much attention to the person who reads your latest blog post. After they read the article, they may have seen a social media post. And then, maybe they saw your email with a discount to buy now — which converted them into a paying customer.

    3 challenges of last click attribution

    Last click attribution is a simple way to start analysing the channels that impact your conversions. But it’s not perfect.

    Here are a few challenges of last click attribution you should keep in mind :

    Challenges of last click attribution.

    1. It ignores all other touchpoints

    Last click attribution is a single-touch attribution model. This type of model declares that a single channel gets 100% of the credit for a sale.

    But this can overlook impactful contributions from other channels.

    Multi-touch attribution seeks to give credit to multiple channels for each conversion. This is a more holistic approach.

    2. It fragments the customer journey

    Most customers need a few touchpoints before they’ll make a purchase.

    Maybe it’s reading a blog post via Google, checking out a social media post on Instagram, and receiving a nurture email.

    If you look only at the last touchpoint before a sale, then you ignore the impact of the other channels. This leads to a fragmented customer journey. 

    Imagine this : You tell your marketing leaders that Facebook ads are responsible for your success because they were the last touch for 65% of conversions. So, you pour your entire budget into Facebook ads.

    What happens ?

    Your sales drop by 60% in one month. This happens because you ignored the traffic you were generating from SEO blog posts that led to that conversion — the nurturing that took place in email marketing.

    3. Say goodbye to brand awareness marketing

    Without a brand, you can’t have a sustainable business.

    Some marketing activities, like brand awareness campaigns, are meant to fuel brand awareness to build a business that lasts for years.

    But if you’re going to use last click attribution to measure the effectiveness of your marketing efforts, then you’re going to diminish the impact of brand awareness.

    Your brand, as a whole, has the ability to generate multiples of your current revenue by simply reaching more people and creating unique brand experiences with new audiences.

    Last click attribution can’t easily measure brand awareness activities, which means their importance is often ignored.

    Last click attribution vs. other attribution models

    Last click attribution is just one type of attribution model. Here are five other common marketing attribution models you might want to consider :

    Image of six different attribution models

    First interaction

    We’ve already touched on last click interaction as a marketing attribution model. But one of the most common models does the opposite.

    First interaction, or first touch, gives full credit to the first channel that brought a lead in. 

    First interaction is best used for top-of-funnel (ToFU) conversions, like user acquisition.

    Last non-direct interaction

    A similar model to last click attribution is one called last non-direct interaction. But one major difference is that it excludes all direct traffic from the calculation. Instead, it assigns full conversion credit to the channel that precedes it.

    For instance, let’s say you see someone comes to your website via a Facebook ad but doesn’t purchase. Then one week later, they go directly to your website through a bookmark they saved and they complete a purchase. Instead of giving attribution to the direct traffic touchpoint (entering your site through a saved bookmark), you attribute the conversion to the previous channel.

    In this case, the Facebook ad gets the credit.

    Last non-direct attribution is best used for BoFu conversions.

    Linear

    Another common attribution model is called linear attribution. Here, you split the credit for a conversion equally across every single touchpoint.

    This means if someone clicks on your blog post in Google, TikTok post, email, and a Facebook ad, then the credit for the conversion is equally split between each of these channels.

    This model is helpful for looking at both BoFu and ToFu activities.

    Time decay

    Time decay is an attribution model that more accurately credits conversions across different touchpoints. This means the closer a channel is to a conversion, the more weight is given to it.

    The time decay model assumes that the closer a channel is to a conversion, the greater that channel’s impact is on a sale.

    Position based

    Position-based, also called U-shaped attribution, is an interesting model that gives multiple channels credit for a conversion.

    But it doesn’t give equal credit to channels or weighted credit to the channels closest to the conversion.

    Instead, it gives the most credit to the first and last interactions.

    In other words, it emphasises the conversion of someone to a lead and, eventually, a customer.

    It gives the first and last interaction 40% of the credit for a conversion and then splits the remaining 20% across the other touchpoints in the customer journey.

    If you’re ever unsure about which attribution model to use, with Matomo, you can compare them to determine the one that best aligns with your goals and accurately reflects conversion paths. 

    Matomo comparing linear, first click, and last click attribution models in the marketing attribution dashboard

    In the above screenshot from Matomo, you can see how last-click compares to first-click and linear models to understand their respective impacts on conversions.

    Try Matomo for Free

    Get the web insights you need, without compromising data accuracy.

    No credit card required

    Use Matomo to track last click attribution

    If you want to improve your marketing, you need to start tracking your efforts. Without marketing attribution, you will never be certain which marketing activities are pushing your business forward.

    Last click attribution is one of the most popular ways to get started with attribution since it, very simply, gives full credit to the last interaction for a conversion.

    If you want to start tracking last click attribution (or any other previously mentioned attribution model), sign up for Matomo’s 21-day free trial today. No credit card required.

  • Solving The XVD Puzzle

    15 avril 2012, par Multimedia Mike — General, multimedi archaeology, silicon valley, vg2, xvd, zygo

    I downloaded a multimedia file a long time ago (at least, I strongly suspected it was a multimedia file which is why I downloaded it). It went by the name of ‘lamborghini_850kbps.vg2′. I have had it in my collection for at least 7 years. I couldn’t remember where I found it. I downloaded it before it occurred to me to take notes about this sort of stuff.

    I found myself staring at the file again today and Googled the filename. This led me to a few Japanese sites which also contained working URLs for a few more .vg2 samples. Some other clues led me to a Russian language forum where someone had linked to a site that had Win32 codec modules that could process the files. The site was defunct but the Internet Archive Wayback Machine kept a copy for me, as well as copies of several more .vg2 samples from a defunct Japanese site previously involved with this codec.

    Sometimes this internet technology works really well. But I digress.

    Anyway, through all this, I finally found a clue : XVD. and wouldn’t you know, there is already a basic page on the MultimediaWiki describing the technology. In fact, while VG2 is a custom container, the MultimediaWiki states that the video component has a FourCC of VGMV, and there is already a file named VGMV.avi in the root V-codecs/ samples directory, something I vow to correct (that’s a big pet peeve of mine– putting samples in the root V-codecs/ or A-codecs/ directories).

    XVD… XVD… XVD… why does that sound so familiar ? Oh, of course ; there is a company named XVD and they have an office in the Bay Area which I have passed on numerous occasions, like this morning :


    <

    Someone originally connected with the multimedia technology in question operates a website which contains an unofficial history of the XVD tech. At first, I was wondering if the technology was completely defunct (and should therefore be open sourced). But if XVD’s solutions page (dated 2010) is to be believed, the technology is still in service, and purported to be better than H.264 and VC-1 : “The current generation of XVD video compression technology provides better video quality at any given data rate than standards-based codecs (H.264 or VC-1) with four times lower encoding complexity (when compared with H.264 Main Profile).”

    If they say so. For my part, I’m just happy that I have finally figured out what this lamborghini_850kbps.vg2 is so that I can properly catalog it on the samples site, which I have now done, along with other samples and various codecs modules.

    This episode reminds me that there’s a branch office of Zygo Corporation close to my home (though the headquarters are far, far away). The companies you see in Silicon Valley. Anyway, long-time open source multimedia hackers will no doubt recognize Zygo from the ZyGo FourCC & video codec transported in QuickTime files that was almost decode-able using an H.263 decoder.



    I may never learn what Zygo’s core competency actually is, but I will always remember their multimedia tech every time I run past their office.