
Recherche avancée
Médias (91)
-
Chuck D with Fine Arts Militia - No Meaning No
15 septembre 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Paul Westerberg - Looking Up in Heaven
15 septembre 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Le Tigre - Fake French
15 septembre 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Thievery Corporation - DC 3000
15 septembre 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Dan the Automator - Relaxation Spa Treatment
15 septembre 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Gilberto Gil - Oslodum
15 septembre 2011, par kent1
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
Autres articles (106)
-
MediaSPIP version 0.1 Beta
16 avril 2011, par kent1MediaSPIP 0.1 beta est la première version de MediaSPIP décrétée comme "utilisable".
Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
Pour avoir une installation fonctionnelle, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...) -
Mise à jour de la version 0.1 vers 0.2
24 juin 2013, par kent1Explications des différents changements notables lors du passage de la version 0.1 de MediaSPIP à la version 0.3. Quelles sont les nouveautés
Au niveau des dépendances logicielles Utilisation des dernières versions de FFMpeg (>= v1.2.1) ; Installation des dépendances pour Smush ; Installation de MediaInfo et FFprobe pour la récupération des métadonnées ; On n’utilise plus ffmpeg2theora ; On n’installe plus flvtool2 au profit de flvtool++ ; On n’installe plus ffmpeg-php qui n’est plus maintenu au (...) -
Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond
5 septembre 2013, par kent1Certains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;
Sur d’autres sites (11260)
-
France rules Google Analytics non-compliant with GDPR
11 février 2022, par Erin — PrivacyBreaking news : The French Data Protection Agency, CNIL (Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés), has concluded that the use of Google Analytics is illegal under GDPR. The CNIL has begun issuing formal notices to website managers using Google Analytics.
This follows the January 2022 Austrian Data Protection Authority’s decision to declare Google Analytics illegal to use under GDPR.
Google Analytics GDPR breaches continue to spread through the EU
Since the invalidation of the Privacy Shield framework, an agreement between the EU and US that allowed the transfer of data to certified US companies, the CNIL and other EU data protection authorities have received numerous complaints regarding data transfers collected during visits to websites using Google Analytics.
"It’s interesting to see that the different European Data Protection Authorities all come to the same conclusion : the use of Google Analytics is illegal. There is a European task force and we assume that this action is coordinated and other authorities will decide similarly."
About the CNIL’s decision
In this model case, the CNIL has found that an unnamed website’s use of Google Analytics is non-compliant with GDPR because it had breached Article 44 which prohibits the transfer of personal data beyond the EU, unless the recipient country can prove adequate data protection.
Under the GDPR, personal data covers a range of identifiers including email address, race, gender, phone number to name a few, but the less obvious identifiers include IP addresses or cookie IDs, for instance.
The CNIL’s decision was based on the fact that the US does not meet GDPR sufficient levels of data protection as a result of US surveillance laws. Therefore, the unnamed website’s use of Google Analytics created risks for their website visitors when their personal data was exported to the US.
At the time of writing, it is unknown if the CNIL has issued a fine for the GDPR breach. However, the website manager of the unnamed website has been ordered by the CNIL to comply with the GDPR and, if necessary, stop using Google Analytics under the current conditions.
"One thing we’re certain of is that these decisions will continue to roll out throughout the EU and potentially beyond.
Other countries are imposing their own privacy regulations that closely mirror the GDPR like Brazil’s General Data Protection Law (LGPD), India’s Data Protection Bill, New Zealand’s Privacy Act and Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) to name a few.”
The CNIL offers an evaluation programme to help website managers determine whether web analytics solutions are exempt from collecting data prior to users’ agreement to opt-in through consent screens. Matomo, for instance, is a leading Google Analytics alternative that has been recommended by CNIL and is exempt from tracking consent.
five5stardesign via Twitter English translation : “This is why I anticipated this announcement, gradually moving the analytics of my sites to @matomo_org since several weeks !
“The @CNIL believes that the use of @googleanalytics is a violation of #GDPR”
Immediate action required for Google Analytics users
The CNIL and other EU-based data protection authorities have made their stance on Google Analytics clear and inaction will likely result in fines, which under the GDPR, can be up to €20 million or 4% of the organisation’s global turnover – whichever is higher.
Based on the CNIL’s formal notice to the model case’s website manager, Google Analytics users should take immediate action to remove any chances of personal data being transferred to the US or find a Google Analytics alternative that is GDPR compliant.
Virginie Debuisson via Twitter English translation : “The CNIL considers that the use of Google Analytics is a violation of the GDPR. I use @matomo_org and I welcome it *winking face* It will squeal tires among growthackers who are slaughtering. Opportunity to look at alternative tools”
Ready to begin your journey to GDPR compliance with Matomo ? Start your 21-day free trial now (no credit card required) and take advantage of our Google Analytics importer so you don’t lose any of your historical data.
What does this mean for Matomo users ?
As the GDPR continues to evolve, our users can rest assured that Matomo will be at the forefront of these changes. With Matomo Cloud, all data is stored in the EU or in your country of choice when you self-host on your own servers with Matomo On-Premise.
Conclusion
Google is in the EU’s crosshairs and organisations that continue to use their tools will be the one’s left to clean up the mess – not Google. Now is the time to act. Search for a Google Analytics alternative and close your compliance gaps today.
Join over 1 million other websites using Matomo now. Give Matomo a try with a 21-day free trial – no credit card required.
Contact details for media :
For quotes or interviews, please email marketing@matomo.org
-
8 Best Tools to Analyse Website Traffic
12 septembre 2023, par Erin — Analytics Tips, MarketingDo you want to analyse your website traffic ?
Maybe you want to know how well you’re converting your traffic. Or maybe you’re looking to track the performance and ROI of your marketing campaigns. Regardless, you won’t get far without relying on a dependable web traffic analysis platform.
In this article, we’ve compiled a list of the top web analytics tools available (including the pricing for each one).
Let’s dive in.
What is website traffic analysis ?
Curious about what it means to analyse website traffic ?
Simply put, it involves collecting and examining data about your website visitors and the actions they take. Marketers, analysts and website owners can then take this data and use it to optimise their strategy to improve site traffic, conversion rates and ROI.
A website analytics tool is software that tracks and measures various visitor activities and behaviours on your website. Common metrics include pageviews, traffic source, bounce rate and average time on page. Using a web analytics solution can give you insights into what’s working (and what’s not working) so you can optimise your website, campaigns or marketing strategy.
Advantages of using a website traffic analysis tool
1. Performance measurement and optimisation
Tracking the success of your marketing efforts is a challenging task. The primary benefit of using a web analytics tool is implementing effective performance measurement. If you don’t know how to measure your efforts, you won’t know what’s working and what’s not with your campaigns and content.
A web analysis tool can give you the insights you need to understand whether your marketing initiatives have been successful or if they need to be improved.
For instance, your new web design facelift may seem beautiful, but if visitors aren’t staying on your site as long and it is resulting in lower conversions, then it’s time to go back to the drawing board.
2. Audience insights to improve the user experience
Web traffic analysis platforms don’t just show you what your visitors are doing. It shows you who your audience is. A powerful website analytics tool will give you in-depth audience data, including demographics like geographical location (e.g., city, state or country), to help you better understand your audience.
Additionally, you can learn more about your audience by seeing how they interact with different content on your site. You’ll start to see that certain content performs better than others, giving you a greater understanding of your audience’s needs and wants. This means you’ll be able to tailor your website content and marketing efforts to your audience to improve the overall user experience.
3. Improve SEO
In the first two advantages, we touched on how insights can help you craft better content for the visitors already coming to your site to improve the user experience and improve conversions. But did you know that using a website analytics tool can also help improve how much traffic you’re getting to your site ?
Since a web analytics tool can help you craft better content, one side effect is an increase in traffic from organic search through SEO. Additionally, your platform will likely show you other traffic sources that your visitors are coming from (i.e., another website is referring traffic to you) so you can tap into those high-performing sources and optimise your incoming traffic over time.
Top 8 Tools to Analyse Website Traffic
Here’s a breakdown of the top eight web analytics platforms to help you analyse each tool’s unique features, price, advantages and disadvantages so you can make the best decision.
1. Matomo
Matomo is an open-source website analytics tool that’s focused on protecting user privacy and data while offering robust insights into your web traffic. It’s one of the most powerful tools to track the entire customer journey on your site.
Why Matomo : As the leader in open-source, privacy-friendly and ethical web analytics, Matomo is trusted by more than 1 million websites, including NASA, the United Nations and the European Commission.
Matomo plays well with Google Analytics to track your websites by filling in the gaps where Google Analytics has limitations (i.e., cookie consent banner requirement). Matomo combines traditional and behavioural web analytics for deeper insights while ensuring compliance with the strictest privacy regulations like GDPR, LGPD and HIPAA.
Matomo Standout Features and Integrations :
Standout features include comprehensive visitor tracking, multi-attribution, goal tracking, event tracking, custom dimensions, custom reports, automated email reports, session recordings, tag manager, roll-up reporting to pull data from multiple sites, Google Analytics importer, heatmaps and more.
Integrations include WordPress, Google Ads, Wix, Drupal, Joomla, Cloudflare, Magento, Vue, SharePoint, WooCommerce and more.
Pricing starts free for Matomo On-Premise (but requires technical skills and servers to set up) and $23/month for Matomo Cloud, which includes a 21-day free trial (no credit card required).
Pros
- Best for respecting visitor privacy
- You own your data — ensuring that it’s not shared with third parties for purposes like advertising
- Compliant with the strictest privacy laws
- Greater flexibility with open-source advantages, as well as the option to either self-host or cloud host
- Can run cookieless — providing 100% accurate data and a better user experience without the need for an annoying cookie consent banner
- Exceptional customisability — from white labeling, alerts and custom dimensions to dashboards and reports, tailor your insights for faster decisions, deeper insights and superior outcomes
Cons
- On-Premise is free, but there are additional costs for advanced features
- On-Premise requires servers and technical expertise to manage
2. Google Analytics
Google Analytics is the most well-known and used web analytics platform in the world, with nearly 30 million active websites.
Why Google Analytics : It’s one of the leading web traffic analysis tools backed by the Alphabet group of companies. For anyone getting started, it’s a great free option to understand your web traffic and your audience.
Google Analytics Standout Features and Integrations :
Standout features include in-depth visitor tracking, event tracking with Google Analytics 4 (GA4), easy integration with Google marketing tools (i.e., Google Search Console and Google Ads), custom reports and easy data importing from third-party sources.
Integrations include Google Ads, Google Webmaster Tools, AdSense, WordPress, Wix, Shopify, Zendesk, Facebook, Marketo, WordPress, Hotjar, SEMrush, Salesforce, Hootsuite and more.
Pricing is free.
Pros
- Detailed audience insights
- Customisable reports
- Seamless integration with other Google products
- Easy to set up
Cons
- Not privacy-friendly — you don’t own your data (data is shared with third parties for advertising purposes)
- Complex interface
- Requires cookie consent banner for GDPR compliance, which negatively impacts data accuracy and user experience
3. Fathom Analytics
Founded in 2018, Fathom Analytics is a privacy-friendly and lightweight web analytics tool. The platform offers a simple, minimalistic dashboard.
Why Fathom Analytics : Fathom Analytics is a minimalistic tool to help website owners gain insights into customer behaviour without compromising on privacy. It’s an easy-to-use tool that offers a simplified breakdown of the most popular data points. For newcomers to web analytics seeking essential metrics like visitor counts and traffic sources, Fathom Analytics provides a straightforward, cost-effective solution.
Fathom Analytics Standout Features and Integrations :
Standout features include easy, automated GA4 importing with lifetime data retention, a single-page dashboard for a quick overview of metrics, traffic summaries for chosen timeframes, visually striking graphs for better data digestion and privacy protection covering major compliance regulations.
Integrations include Google Analytics, Squarespace, Drupal, WordPress, Discourse, Bloggi, ConvertKit, Webflow, Transistor, Remix, Gatsby and Carrd.
Pricing starts at $14/month for up to 100k pageviews (with a 30-day free trial).
Pros
- Doesn’t use cookies
- Out-of-the-box GDPR, ePrivacy, PECR and CCPA compliance
- Great for visual data insights
- Lightweight tracking script for fast loading
Cons
- Can’t easily see traffic trends on specific pages
- Metrics may be too simple for those wanting advanced analytics
4. Mixpanel
Mixpanel is a web analytics platform that helps you track visitors as well as improve customer retention. The software has 8,000 customers worldwide, including Netflix, Yelp, BuzzFeed and CNN.
Why Mixpanel : Mixpanel is great for websites with e-commerce functionality. The tool helps you understand both your site visitors and your customers so you can optimise your customer experience and improve conversions.
Mixpanel Standout Features and Integrations :
Standout features include deep insights into how your products are being used, including your most popular features, user cohorts that let you segment users based on specific actions, and visual analysis showing where users drop off.
Integrations include Google Cloud, Figma, Mailchimp, Zoho CRM, Databox, Marketo, Hotjar, Slack, Zapier, Amazon Web Services, Google Ads and HubSpot.
Pricing starts free for up to 20 million events per month and $20/month for Growth.
Pros
- Interface is easy for beginners
- Exhaustive reporting options
- Custom event tracking options
- Predict user actions based on data science models
- Send targeted messages to specific users to encourage action
Cons
- User-based pricing isn’t the most ideal for everyone
- Alert management can be confusing
5. Kissmetrics
Kissmetrics is a marketing and product analytics tool that helps e-commerce and SaaS companies grow through qualitative data insights. The web analytics tool is trusted by 10,000 users, including Microsoft, Unbounce, AWeber, Dropbox DocSend and SendGrid.
Why Kissmetrics : As an e-commerce-driven analytics platform, the platform is best suited for Enterprise businesses, but it also offers flexible pricing plans that make it easy for someone to get their feet wet with website analytics.
Kissmetrics Standout Features and Integrations :
Standout features include a customisable dashboard to see key metrics at a glance, comprehensive visitor tracking, cohort analysis including power user tracking to understand your most active visitors and customers and insights into customer lifetime value and churn rate.
Integrations include Chargify, HubSpot, Slack, Live Chat, Marketo, Optimizely, Mailchimp, Recurly, Wufoo Forms, Facebook Ads, WordPress, Shopify and WooCommerce.
Pricing starts at $0.0025/event for the Pay As You Go Plan, $25.99/month for Build Your Plan and $199/month for Small Teams, which includes a 7-day free trial.
Pros
- Flexible pricing options
- Easy to install
- Several analytics viewing options
- Visual checkout funnel insights
- Track sessions by desktop or mobile
Cons
- Despite more pricing options, it’s still quite expensive overall
- Difficult to use for beginners
6. Adobe Analytics
Adobe Analytics is a web and marketing analytics platform within the Adobe Experience Platform. Used by over 170,000 businesses, it’s one of the most popular analytics solutions available.
Why Adobe Analytics : Adobe Analytics was created for large organisations. It’s essentially the enterprise version of Google Analytics. The tool does a great job of offering a customised analytics solution that’s capable of delivering personalised user experiences at scale.
Adobe Analytics Standout Features and Integrations :
Standout features include attribution, AI-driven predictive analytics, robust customer segmentation and automation based on customer behaviour.
Integrations include all Adobe products, Salesforce, Hootsuite, Contentsquare, Sisense, Mouseflow, Google Ads, Google Search Console, HubSpot and Microsoft Teams.
Pricing is custom and available upon request, but users can expect to pay at least $2,000 per month, and there is no free trial.
Pros
- Built for enterprise businesses
- Seamless workflow integration for Adobe Experience Cloud users
- Incredible customisation options
- Integration process is flexible
- Capable of accurately tracking large volumes of traffic
Cons
- Very expensive
- Not suitable for small businesses
- The setup is challenging for beginners
7. SimilarWeb
SimilarWeb is a robust analytics platform used to track your website data and compare it to other websites. Backed by a team of experienced data scientists and mathematicians for in-depth website traffic and search engine analysis. Founded in 2007, the platform is trusted by major brands like Adidas, DHL, PepsiCo and Walmart.
Why SimilarWeb : The tool relies on multiple scientific methodologies and approaches to data analysis to help provide a better understanding of visitors and customers. The platform is great for crafting prediction models for customer acquisitions by using machine learning to offer SEO insights and competitive analysis.
SimilarWeb Standout Features and Integrations :
Standout features include competition traffic and engagement analysis, in-depth visitor tracking, keyword analysis to optimise your SEO and search ads, affiliate traffic analysis, search traffic analysis and funnel insights.
Integrations include Salesforce, HubSpot, Google Analytics, Google Search Console, Shift, AT Internet, Adverity, SimilarTech, Biscience and more.
Pricing starts at $125/month for the Starter plan, which includes a 7-day free trial.
Pros
- Has a user-friendly dashboard for simple insights
- Highly customisable platform to meet your specific needs
- Easy competition analysis
- Funnel insights to improve your conversion rates
- Great customer support
Cons
- Expensive pricing
- Doesn’t include a code snippet to pull data directly from websites
- Doesn’t show sub-domains of your site
8. Hotjar
Hotjar is a behavioural website analytics tool with a focus on providing insights into individual user sessions with features like heatmaps and session recordings. Founded in 2014, Hotjar is used by 900,000 sites around the world.
Why Hotjar : Unlike traditional web analytics tools like Google Analytics, Hotjar is a behavioural analytics tool that provides in-depth behaviour insights session by session. The tool offers a variety of features that give you a sneak peek into your users’ behaviours by watching how they interact with your site action by action.
Hotjar Standout Features and Integrations :
Standout features include comprehensive heat mapping, visitor session recordings to see what visitors did moment by moment, feedback polls to gain insights from site visitors and conversion funnels to help you analyse leaks in your funnel at each conversion stage.
Integrations include HubSpot, Slack, Jira, WordPress, Shopify, Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Microsoft Teams, Zapier and ClickFunnels.
Pricing starts at free for the Basic plan and $80/month for Business, which includes a 15-day free trial.
Pros
- You can see exactly where visitors click, move and scroll
- Watch session replays to see what visitors did step-by-step
- See what percentage of visitors take certain actions
- Data segmentation features to help you understand KPIs in-depth
- There are no user limits with the platform, making it easy to scale
Cons
- While it offers behavioural analytics, Hotjar doesn’t provide insights into traditional web analytics like Matomo does, including traffic sources and bounce rate
- History data monitoring is complex
Elevate your website performance today
Understanding your visitors’ behaviour and needs is essential when you’re looking to improve your website performance.
By leveraging a website analytics platform, you’ll be able to gain new insights into your visitors and use insights from your content and campaign performance to improve your user experience.
If you’re looking to start using a web traffic analysis tool today, then Matomo is an excellent choice.
Matomo is a powerful, privacy-friendly and compliant tool that gives in-depth insights into your audience, your content and your marketing efforts to help you improve your site’s performance.
The platform also includes a variety of robust behavioural analytics features like heatmaps, session recording and more, which are included in your Cloud subscription.
Start your 21-day free trial of Matomo today (no credit card required).
-
Google Optimize vs Matomo A/B Testing : Everything You Need to Know
17 mars 2023, par Erin — Analytics TipsGoogle Optimize is a popular A/B testing tool marketers use to validate the performance of different marketing assets, website design elements and promotional offers.
But by September 2023, Google will sunset both free and paid versions of the Optimize product.
If you’re searching for an equally robust, but GDPR compliant, privacy-friendly alternative to Google Optimize, have a look at Matomo A/B Testing.
Integrated with our analytics platform and conversion rate optimisation (CRO) tools, Matomo allows you to run A/B and A/B/n tests without any usage caps or compromises in user privacy.
Disclaimer : Please note that the information provided in this blog post is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal advice. Every situation is unique and requires a specific legal analysis. If you have any questions regarding the legal implications of any matter, please consult with your legal team or seek advice from a qualified legal professional.
Google Optimize vs Matomo : Key Capabilities Compared
This guide shows how Matomo A/B testing stacks against Google Optimize in terms of features, reporting, integrations and pricing.
Supported Platforms
Google Optimize supports experiments for dynamic websites and single-page mobile apps only.
If you want to run split tests in mobile apps, you’ll have to do so via Firebase — Google’s app development platform. It also has a free tier but paid usage-based subscription kicks in after your product(s) reaches a certain usage threshold.
Google Optimize also doesn’t support CRO experiments for web or desktop applications, email campaigns or paid ad campaigns.Matomo A/B Testing, in contrast, allows you to run experiments in virtually every channel. We have three installation options — using JavaScript, server-side technology, or our mobile tracking SDK. These allow you to run split tests in any type of web or mobile app (including games), a desktop product, or on your website. Also, you can do different email marketing tests (e.g., compare subject line variants).
A/B Testing
A/B testing (split testing) is the core feature of both products. Marketers use A/B testing to determine which creative elements such as website microcopy, button placements and banner versions, resonate better with target audiences.
You can benchmark different versions against one another to determine which variation resonates more with users. Or you can test an A version against B, C, D and beyond. This is called A/B/n testing.
Both Matomo A/B testing and Google Optimize let you test either separate page elements or two completely different landing page designs, using redirect tests. You can show different variants to different user groups (aka apply targeting criteria). For example, activate tests only for certain device types, locations or types of on-site behaviour.
The advantage of Matomo is that we don’t limit the number of concurrent experiments you can run. With Google Optimize, you’re limited to 5 simultaneous experiments. Likewise,
Matomo lets you select an unlimited number of experiment objectives, whereas Google caps the maximum choice to 3 predefined options per experiment.
Objectives are criteria the underlying statistical model will use to determine the best-performing version. Typically, marketers use metrics such as page views, session duration, bounce rate or generated revenue as conversion goals.
Multivariate testing (MVT)
Multivariate testing (MVT) allows you to “pack” several A/B tests into one active experiment. In other words : You create a stack of variants to determine which combination drives the best marketing outcomes.
For example, an MVT experiment can include five versions of a web page, where each has a different slogan, product image, call-to-action, etc. Visitors are then served with a different variation. The tracking code collects data on their behaviours and desired outcomes (objectives) and reports the results.
MVT saves marketers time as it’s a great alternative to doing separate A/B tests for each variable. Both Matomo and Google Optimize support this feature. However, Google Optimize caps the number of possible combinations at 16, whereas Matomo has no limits.
Redirect Tests
Redirect tests, also known as split URL tests, allow you to serve two entirely different web page versions to users and compare their performance. This option comes in handy when you’re redesigning your website or want to test a localised page version in a new market.
Also, redirect tests are a great way to validate the performance of bottom-of-the-funnel (BoFU) pages as a checkout page (for eCommerce websites), a pricing page (for SaaS apps) or a contact/booking form (for a B2B service businesses).
You can do split URL tests with Google Optimize and Matomo A/B Testing.
Experiment Design
Google Optimize provides a visual editor for making simple page changes to your website (e.g., changing button colour or adding several headline variations). You can then preview the changes before publishing an experiment. For more complex experiments (e.g., testing different page block sequences), you’ll have to codify experiments using custom JavaScript, HTML and CSS.
In Matomo, all A/B tests are configured on the server-side (i.e., by editing your website’s raw HTML) or client-side via JavaScript. Afterwards, you use the Matomo interface to start or schedule an experiment, set objectives and view reports.
Experiment Configuration
Marketers know how complex customer journeys can be. Multiple factors — from location and device to time of the day and discount size — can impact your conversion rates. That’s why a great CRO app allows you to configure multiple tracking conditions.
Matomo A/B testing comes with granular controls. First of all, you can decide which percentage of total web visitors participate in any given experiment. By default, the number is set to 100%, but you can change it to any other option.
Likewise, you can change which percentage of traffic each variant gets in an experiment. For example, your original version can get 30% of traffic, while options A and B receive 40% each. We also allow users to specify custom parameters for experiment participation. You can only show your variants to people in specific geo-location or returning visitors only.
Finally, you can select any type of meaningful objective to evaluate each variant’s performance. With Matomo, you can either use standard website analytics metrics (e.g., total page views, bounce rate, CTR, visit direction, etc) or custom goals (e.g., form click, asset download, eCommerce order, etc).
In other words : You’re in charge of deciding on your campaign targeting criteria, duration and evaluation objectives.
A free Google Optimize account comes with three main types of user targeting options :
- Geo-targeting at city, region, metro and country levels.
- Technology targeting by browser, OS or device type, first-party cookie, etc.
- Behavioural targeting based on metrics like “time since first arrival” and “page referrer” (referral traffic source).
Users can also configure other types of tracking scenarios (for example to only serve tests to signed-in users), using condition-based rules.
Reporting
Both Matomo and Google Optimize use different statistical models to evaluate which variation performs best.
Matomo relies on statistical hypothesis testing, which we use to count unique visitors and report on conversion rates. We analyse all user data (with no data sampling applied), meaning you get accurate reporting, based on first-hand data, rather than deductions. For that reason, we ask users to avoid drawing conclusions before their experiment participation numbers reach a statistically significant result. Typically, we recommend running an experiment for at least several business cycles to get a comprehensive report.
Google Optimize, in turn, uses Bayesian inference — a statistical method, which relies on a random sample of users to compare the performance rates of each creative against one another. While a Bayesian model generates CRO reports faster and at a bigger scale, it’s based on inferences.
Model developers need to have the necessary skills to translate subjective prior beliefs about the probability of a certain event into a mathematical formula. Since Google Optimize is a proprietary tool, you cannot audit the underlying model design and verify its accuracy. In other words, you trust that it was created with the right judgement.
In comparison, Matomo started as an open-source project, and our source code can be audited independently by anyone at any time.
Another reporting difference to mind is the reporting delays. Matomo Cloud generates A/B reports within 6 hours and in only 1 hour for Matomo On-Premise. Google Optimize, in turn, requires 12 hours from the first experiment setup to start reporting on results.
When you configure a test experiment and want to quickly verify that everything is set up correctly, this can be an inconvenience.
User Privacy & GDPR Compliance
Google Optimize works in conjunction with Google Analytics, which isn’t GDPR compliant.
For all website traffic from the EU, you’re therefore obliged to show a cookie consent banner. The kicker, however, is that you can only show an Optimize experiment after the user gives consent to tracking. If the user doesn’t, they will only see an original page version. Considering that almost 40% of global consumers reject cookie consent banners, this can significantly affect your results.
This renders Google Optimize mostly useless in the EU since it would only allow you to run tests with a fraction ( 60%) of EU traffic — and even less if you apply any extra targeting criteria.
In comparison, Matomo is fully GDPR compliant. Therefore, our users are legally exempt from displaying cookie-consent banners in most EU markets (with Germany and the UK being an exception). Since Matomo A/B testing is part of Matomo web analytics, you don’t have to worry about GDPR compliance or breaches in user privacy.
Digital Experience Intelligence
You can get comprehensive statistical data on variants’ performance with Google Optimize. But you don’t get further insights on why some tests are more successful than others.
Matomo enables you to collect more insights with two extra features :
- User session recordings : Monitor how users behave on different page versions. Observe clicks, mouse movements, scrolls, page changes, and form interactions to better understand the users’ cumulative digital experience.
- Heatmaps : Determine which elements attract the most users’ attention to fine-tune your split tests. With a standard CRO tool, you only assume that a certain page element does matter for most users. A heatmap can help you determine for sure.
Both of these features are bundled into your Matomo Cloud subscription.
Integrations
Both Matomo and Google Optimize integrate with multiple other tools.
Google Optimize has native integrations with other products in the marketing family — GA, Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Google BigQuery, Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP), and Firebase. Separately, other popular marketing apps have created custom connectors for integrating Google Optimize data.
Matomo A/B Testing, in turn, can be combined with other web analytics and CRO features such as Funnels, Multi-Channel Attribution, Tag Manager, Form Analytics, Heatmaps, Session Recording, and more !
You can also conveniently export your website analytics or CRO data using Matomo Analytics API to analyse it in another app.
Pricing
Google Optimize is a free tool but has usage caps. If you want to schedule more than 5 concurrent experiments or test more than 16 variants at once, you’ll have to upgrade to Optimize 360. Optimize 360 prices aren’t listed publicly but are said to be closer to six figures per year.
Matomo A/B Testing is available with every Cloud subscription (starting from €19) and Matomo On-Premise users can also get A/B Testing as a plugin (starting from €199/year). In each case, there are no caps or data limits.
Google Optimize vs Matomo A/B Testing : Comparison Table
Features/capabilities Google Optimize Matomo A/B test Supported channels Web Web, mobile, email, digital campaigns A/B testing Multivariate testing (MVT) Split URL tests Web analytics integration Native with UA/GA4 Native with Matomo
You can also migrate historical UA (GA3) data to MatomoAudience segmentation Basic Advanced Geo-targeting Technology targeting Behavioural targeting Basic Advanced Reporting model Bayesian analysis Statistical hypothesis testing Report availability Within 12 hours after setup 6 hours for Matomo Cloud
1 hour for Matomo On-PremiseHeatmaps
Included with Matomo CloudSession recordings
Included with Matomo CloudGDPR compliance Support Self-help desk on a free tier Self-help guides, user forum, email Price Free limited tier From €19 for Cloud subscription
From €199/year as plugin for On-PremiseFinal Thoughts : Who Benefits the Most From an A/B Testing Tool ?
Split testing is an excellent method for validating various assumptions about your target customers.
With A/B testing tools you get a data-backed answer to research hypotheses such as “How different pricing affects purchases ?”, “What contact button placement generates more clicks ?”, “Which registration form performs best with new app subscribers ?” and more.
Such insights can be game-changing when you’re trying to improve your demand-generation efforts or conversion rates at the BoFu stage. But to get meaningful results from CRO tests, you need to select measurable, representative objectives.
For example, split testing different pricing strategies for low-priced, frequently purchased products makes sense as you can run an experiment for a couple of weeks to get a statistically relevant sample.
But if you’re in a B2B SaaS product, where the average sales cycle takes weeks (or months) to finalise and things like “time-sensitive discounts” or “one-time promos” don’t really work, getting adequate CRO data will be harder.
To see tangible results from CRO, you’ll need to spend more time on test ideation than implementation. Your team needs to figure out : which elements to test, in what order, and why.
Effective CRO tests are designed for a specific part of the funnel and assume that you’re capable of effectively identifying and tracking conversions (goals) at the selected stage. This alone can be a complex task since not all customer journeys are alike. For SaaS websites, using a goal like “free trial account registration” can be a good starting point.
A good test also produces a meaningful difference between the proposed variant and the original version. As Nima Yassini, Partner at Deloitte Digital, rightfully argues :
“I see people experimenting with the goal of creating an uplift. There’s nothing wrong with that, but if you’re only looking to get wins you will be crushed when the first few tests fail. The industry average says that only one in five to seven tests win, so you need to be prepared to lose most of the time”.
In many cases, CRO tests don’t provide the data you expected (e.g., people equally click the blue and green buttons). In this case, you need to start building your hypothesis from scratch.
At the same time, it’s easy to get caught up in optimising for “vanity metrics” — such that look good in the report, but don’t quite match your marketing objectives. For example, better email headline variations can improve your email open rates. But if users don’t proceed to engage with the email content (e.g. click-through to your website or use a provided discount code), your efforts are still falling short.
That’s why developing a baseline strategy is important before committing to an A/B testing tool. Google Optimize appealed to many users because it’s free and allows you to test your split test strategy cost-effectively.
With its upcoming depreciation, many marketers are very committed to a more expensive A/B tool (especially when they’re not fully sure about their CRO strategy and its results).
Matomo A/B testing is a cost-effective, GDPR-compliant alternative to Google Optimize with a low learning curve and extra competitive features.
Discover if Matomo A/B Testing is the ideal Google Optimize alternative for your organization with our free 21-day trial. No credit card required.