
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (99)
-
MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version
25 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...) -
ANNEXE : Les plugins utilisés spécifiquement pour la ferme
5 mars 2010, parLe site central/maître de la ferme a besoin d’utiliser plusieurs plugins supplémentaires vis à vis des canaux pour son bon fonctionnement. le plugin Gestion de la mutualisation ; le plugin inscription3 pour gérer les inscriptions et les demandes de création d’instance de mutualisation dès l’inscription des utilisateurs ; le plugin verifier qui fournit une API de vérification des champs (utilisé par inscription3) ; le plugin champs extras v2 nécessité par inscription3 (...)
-
Problèmes fréquents
10 mars 2010, parPHP et safe_mode activé
Une des principales sources de problèmes relève de la configuration de PHP et notamment de l’activation du safe_mode
La solution consiterait à soit désactiver le safe_mode soit placer le script dans un répertoire accessible par apache pour le site
Sur d’autres sites (10545)
-
Video Conferencing in HTML5 : WebRTC via Web Sockets
14 juin 2012, par silviaA bit over a week ago I gave a presentation at Web Directions Code 2012 in Melbourne. Maxine and John asked me to speak about something related to HTML5 video, so I went for the new shiny : WebRTC – real-time communication in the browser.
I only had 20 min, so I had to make it tight. I wanted to show off video conferencing without special plugins in Google Chrome in just a few lines of code, as is the promise of WebRTC. To a large extent, I achieved this. But I made some interesting discoveries along the way. Demos are in the slide deck.
UPDATE : Opera 12 has been released with WebRTC support.
Housekeeping : if you want to replicate what I have done, you need to install a Google Chrome Web Browser 19+. Then make sure you go to chrome ://flags and activate the MediaStream and PeerConnection experiment(s). Restart your browser and now you can experiment with this feature. Big warning up-front : it’s not production-ready, since there are still changes happening to the spec and there is no compatible implementation by another browser yet.
Here is a brief summary of the steps involved to set up video conferencing in your browser :
- Set up a video element each for the local and the remote video stream.
- Grab the local camera and stream it to the first video element.
- (*) Establish a connection to another person running the same Web page.
- Send the local camera stream on that peer connection.
- Accept the remote camera stream into the second video element.
Now, the most difficult part of all of this – believe it or not – is the signalling part that is required to build the peer connection (marked with (*)). Initially I wanted to run completely without a server and just enter the remote’s IP address to establish the connection. This is, however, not a functionality that the PeerConnection object provides [might this be something to add to the spec ?].
So, you need a server known to both parties that can provide for the handshake to set up the connection. All the examples that I have seen, such as https://apprtc.appspot.com/, use a channel management server on Google’s appengine. I wanted it all working with HTML5 technology, so I decided to use a Web Socket server instead.
I implemented my Web Socket server using node.js (code of websocket server). The video conferencing demo is in the slide deck in an iframe – you can also use the stand-alone html page. Works like a treat.
While it is still using Google’s STUN server to get through NAT, the messaging for setting up the connection is running completely through the Web Socket server. The messages that get exchanged are plain SDP message packets with a session ID. There are OFFER, ANSWER, and OK packets exchanged for each streaming direction. You can see some of it in the below image :
I’m not running a public WebSocket server, so you won’t be able to see this part of the presentation working. But the local loopback video should work.
At the conference, it all went without a hitch (while the wireless played along). I believe you have to host the WebSocket server on the same machine as the Web page, otherwise it won’t work for security reasons.
A whole new world of opportunities lies out there when we get the ability to set up video conferencing on every Web page – scary and exciting at the same time !
-
Processing .Raw images using ffmpeg or OpenCV
23 février 2013, par Ahmed KatoAfter reading Wikipedia page of Raw image format which is the digital negative of any image.
To be viewed or printed, the output from a camera's image sensor has
to be processed, that is, converted to a photographic rendering of the
scene, and then stored in a standard raster graphics format such as
JPEG. This processing, whether done in-camera or later in a raw-file
converter, involves a number of operations, typically includingI have some .raw files grabbed from my Logitech c920 using v4l2 example but when I display the image it looks like this :
a raw image where in other frames I can see my shadow
Does anyone knows how to process such files to see the complete frame ?
-
how to get the frame from HTTP [on hold]
11 avril 2016, par Jingheng LuoHere, we have a camera, but for the security, we can not just get the video stream from the camera, then we use HTTP to protect it, that we can only access to the camera through the HTTP while can not get the frame directly from the camera, how can I get the frame from the http?? I heard that we can use FFMPEG, but I still don’t figure out how to use it.