Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (11378)

• How would I create a radially offset mosaic of rtsp streams that transitions to a logo

  18 juillet 2018, par Jack

  I’m new to stack overflow, but I’ve been researching how to do this for a couple weeks to no avail. I’m hoping perhaps one of you has some knowledge I haven’t seen online yet.

  Here is a crude illustration of what I hope to accomplish. I have a video wall of eight monitors - four each of two different sizes. The way it’s set up now, all eight monitors are treated together as one big monitor displaying an oddly shaped cutout of a desktop.

  Eventually I need each individual monitor to display a separate RTSP stream for about thirty seconds, then have the entire display - all eight monitors in conjunction - to fade out into a large logo.

  My problem right now is that I don’t know of a way to mask an rtsp stream so it looks like this rather than this, let alone how to arrange them into a weirdly spaced, oddly angled, multiple aspect-ratio mosaic like in the original illustration.

  Thank you all for your time. I’m just an intern here without insane technical knowhow, but I’ll try to clarify as much as I can.

  -J

• Revision af660715c0 : Make coefficient skip condition an explicit RD choice. This commit replaces zru

  28 juin 2013, par Ronald S. Bultje

  Changed Paths :
   Modify /vp9/common/vp9_rtcd_defs.sh

  
   Modify /vp9/encoder/vp9_block.h

  
   Modify /vp9/encoder/vp9_onyx_int.h

  
   Modify /vp9/encoder/vp9_quantize.c

  
   Modify /vp9/encoder/vp9_rdopt.c

  
   Modify /vp9/encoder/x86/vp9_error_sse2.asm

  
  
  Make coefficient skip condition an explicit RD choice.

  This commit replaces zrun_zbin_boost, a method of biasing non-zero
  coefficients following runs of zero-coefficients to be rounded towards
  zero, with an explicit skip-block choice in the RD loop.

  The logic is basically that if individual coefficients should be rounded
  towards zero (from a RD point of view), the trellis/optimize loop should
  take care of it. If whole blocks should be zero (from a RD point of
  view), a single RD check is much more efficient than a complete
  serialization of the quantization loop.

  Quality change : derf +0.5% psnr, +1.6% ssim ; yt +0.6% psnr, +1.1% ssim.
  SIMD for quantize will follow in a separate patch. Results for other
  test sets pending.

  Change-Id : Ife5fa641163ac5150ac428011e87188f1937c1f4

• Efficiently write a movie directly from np.array using pipes

  16 juin 2017, par Matt Billman

  I have a 4D numpy array of movie frames. I’m looking for a function to write them to a movie, at a given framerate. I have FFMPEG installed on my OS, and as I can see from these answers, the most efficient way to do so is via pipes.

  However, I have very little experience using pipes, and the explanations in the link above make little sense to me. Furthermore, very few of the answers seem actually implement pipes, and the one that does uses mencoder, not FFMPEG. I am relatively inexperienced with FFMPEG, so am not sure how to modify the command string from the mencoder answer to make it work in FFMPEG.

  WHAT I WOULD LIKE :

  A function of the following form :

  animate_np_array(4d_array, framerate) -> output.mp4 (or other video codec)

  Which implements pipes to send frames one after the other to FFMPEG, and which I can copy-paste into my existing code.

  Furthermore, it is absolutely necessary that this function never actually plots any of the frames, as calls to the matplotlib.imshow() function (as I have most typically seen used) slow things down considerably.