Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (9939)

• ffmpeg : video to images with pts in filename

  12 février 2016, par ntg

  I am trying to extract images of exact times (say every second) from a mp4 video of an experiment. There are a lot of methods to do that using ffmpeg out there, but surprisingly enough the time accuracy is off.

  To measure accuracy, I have first time-stamped the video using pts, e.g. :

  -vf "[in] scale=640:-2 , drawtext=fontcolor=white:fontsize=22:fontfile='times.ttf':timecode='22\:10\:55\:00:text='03/12/15__':r=23.976023976:x=0:y=0 [out]"

  And as a result I got a millisecond precision time-stamp on the video. I checked the video and it seems the time-stamps are very accurate. I then tried all the methods I could find out there including :

  -Using -ss [timestamp] to go to an exact time and -vframes 1 to get the first frame at that time : this method is extremely slow since it involves calling ffmpeg once for each second of the video. Furthermore, seems to work fine for the first minutes, but then gets out of sync.

  -Using fps=1 and using out_%05d.jpg as the output. This was probably the most inaccurate, as it went off by whole seconds, plus it never got exactly the 0th millisecond.

  -Using a fast fps, and then selecting only the ones I need, e.g. -vf "fps=10, framestep=10, select=not(mod(n\,40))" was promising for the first minutes, but also became inaccurate after that.

  -I tried writing the pts/date as metadata, but (do not know how to /cannot) write to the metadata of a .jpg from ffmpeg...

  The problem is that after some time, if we are using out_%05d.jpg, the numbers get completely out of sinc, while the -ss gets inaccurate, and takes forever.

  Ideally there should be a way to write the %pts or the date as part of the filename... Does anyone know a method to extract images from an .mp4 file with millisecond precision, preferably using ffmpeg (or its library ? I am using python and getting desperate...)

  [Edit : as explained in the comment by Mulvya, the pts is calculated by using the fps of the video, ffmpeg can give it to you. In my case some of the videos have 30 and others 24*(100/1001) fps. Bellow is an example, which was produced by :

  args = ['ffmpeg',
  
   '-i',
  
   'c:\\Temp\\scr_cam.mp4',
  
   '-y',
  
   '-vf',
  
   "[in] drawtext=fontcolor=black:fontsize=22:fontfile='times.ttf':timecode='17\\:00\\:29\\:00':text='09/02/16__':r=30.0:x=0:y=0, drawtext=fontcolor=black:fontsize=22:fontfile='times.ttf':timecode='00\\:00\\:00\\:00':text='':r=30.0 :x=0:y=30, drawtext=fontcolor=black:fontsize=22:fontfile='times.ttf':text='n\\: %{n}   pts\\:%{pts}':r=30.0:x=0:y=60 [out]",
  
   '-c:a',
  
   'copy',
  
   '-metadata',
  
   'creation_time=2016-02-09T17:00:29',
  
   '-preset',
  
   'ultrafast',
  
   '-threads',
  
   '3',
  
   'c:\\Temp\\stamped_scr_cam.mp4']
  
  subprocess.call(args)

  In it we see that indeed pts = n/30 (n is the frame no). I have tried many combinations of the params of the commands I talk in the beginning, so listing all my efforts would take too much space. As we see, the drawtext seems to be very accurate, so it does not seem to be a problem of incorrect fps.

  

  To get the fps I am using :

  def get_frame_rate_and_duration(filename):
  
      if not os.path.exists(filename):
  
          sys.stderr.write("ERROR: filename %r was not found!" % (filename,))
  
          return -1
  
      args = ["ffprobe",filename,"-v","0","-select_streams","v","-print_format","flat"]
  
      args.extend(["-show_entries","stream=r_frame_rate"])
  
      args.extend(["-show_entries","format=duration"])
  
      out = subprocess.check_output(args).split("\n")
  
      rate = out[0].split('=')[1].strip()[1:-1].split('/')
  
      duration = pd.Timedelta("{0} sec".format(out[1].split('=')[1].strip()[1:-1]))
  
      if len(rate)==1:
  
          rate = float(rate[0])
  
      if len(rate)==2:
  
          rate =  float(rate[0])/float(rate[1])
  
      else:
  
          rate = -1
  
      return rate, duration

• avfilter/af_aiir : add cascaded biquads support

  8 janvier 2018, par Paul B Mahol

  avfilter/af_aiir : add cascaded biquads support
  Also add precision option.
  Signed-off-by : Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com>
  

  • [DH] libavfilter/af_aiir.c

• Anomalie #4075 (Fermé) : Mail du privé envoyés aux auteurs des messages proposés dans le public si...

  15 janvier 2018

  Bonjour,

  Avec SPIP 3.1.7 SVN 23838 je viens de tomber sur le cas suivant :

  • un article publié
  • avec une contribution au forum ayant le statut prop
  • passage de l’article en statut "En cours de rédaction"
  • dans l’admin, publication d’un commentaire en bas de l’article
  • le mail a été envoyé sur l’email de la contribution publique alors que seuls les auteurs de l’article auraient dû être notifiés

  Précision, plugin Notifications 3.5.13 installé avec ce réglage (en PJ).
  Je signale donc ça aussi sur le forum du plugin au cas où.