Recherche avancée

Médias (29)

Mot : - Tags -/Musique

Autres articles (65)

  • Supporting all media types

    13 avril 2011, par

    Unlike most software and media-sharing platforms, MediaSPIP aims to manage as many different media types as possible. The following are just a few examples from an ever-expanding list of supported formats : images : png, gif, jpg, bmp and more audio : MP3, Ogg, Wav and more video : AVI, MP4, OGV, mpg, mov, wmv and more text, code and other data : OpenOffice, Microsoft Office (Word, PowerPoint, Excel), web (html, CSS), LaTeX, Google Earth and (...)

  • Participer à sa traduction

    10 avril 2011

    Vous pouvez nous aider à améliorer les locutions utilisées dans le logiciel ou à traduire celui-ci dans n’importe qu’elle nouvelle langue permettant sa diffusion à de nouvelles communautés linguistiques.
    Pour ce faire, on utilise l’interface de traduction de SPIP où l’ensemble des modules de langue de MediaSPIP sont à disposition. ll vous suffit de vous inscrire sur la liste de discussion des traducteurs pour demander plus d’informations.
    Actuellement MediaSPIP n’est disponible qu’en français et (...)

  • Des sites réalisés avec MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    Cette page présente quelques-uns des sites fonctionnant sous MediaSPIP.
    Vous pouvez bien entendu ajouter le votre grâce au formulaire en bas de page.

Sur d’autres sites (12853)

  • Streaming a webcam to a web server to be streamed on web

    19 octobre 2012, par gazzwi86

    I intend on streaming a web cam from a Raspberry Pi to a server, which can then serve the stream up to users over the web. I would ideally like the stream to work across all browsers with minimal complication, so the current mjpeg format I presume would not be ideal.

    Firstly, I would like to know if ffmpeg is the right tool for the job as its what I'm experimenting with at the moment ? I also looked at using ffmpeg and motion but didnt see the need for motion as I don't need motion detection. My config for ffmpeg is listed below :

    I installed via apt-get :

    apt-get install ffmpeg

    I have create a config file /etc/ffserver.conf containing the following :

    Port 80
    BindAddress 0.0.0.0
    MaxClients 10
    MaxBandwidth 50000
    NoDaemon

    <feed>
       file /tmp/webcam.ffm
       FileMaxSize 10M
    </feed>

    <stream>
       Feed webcam.ffm
       Format mpjpeg
       VideoSize 640x480
       VideoFrameRate 15
       VideoBitRate 2000
       VideoQMin 1
       VideoQMax 10
       strict -1
    </stream>

    I have created a file in the sbin called webcam.sh containing the following :

    ffserver -f /etc/ffserver.conf &amp; ffmpeg -v verbose -r 5 -s 640x480 -f video4linux2 -i /dev/video0 http://localhost/webcam.ffm

    Running the above starts the stream but at the moment viewing http://webcam.mjpeg starts a file downloading which seems not to start in chrome and doing the same with and html file with the stream in a img tag doesnt work.

  • What is the most performant way to render unmanaged video frames in WPF ?

    27 mai 2017, par superware

    I’m using FFmpeg library to receive and decode H.264/MPEG-TS over UDP with minimal latency (something MediaElement can’t handle).

    On a dedicated FFmpeg thread, I’m pulling PixelFormats.Bgr32 video frames for display. I’ve already tried InteropBitmap :

    _section = CreateFileMapping(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, IntPtr.Zero, PAGE_READWRITE, 0, size, null);
    _buffer = MapViewOfFile(_section, FILE_MAP_ALL_ACCESS, 0, 0, size);
    Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
    {
       _interopBitmap = (InteropBitmap)Imaging.CreateBitmapSourceFromMemorySection(_section, width, height, PixelFormats.Bgr32, (int)size / height, 0);
       this.Source = _interopBitmap;
    });

    And then per frame update :

    Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
    {
       _interopBitmap.Invalidate();
    });

    But performance is quite bad (skipping frames, high CPU usage etc).

    I’ve also tried WriteableBitmap : FFmpeg is placing frames in _writeableBitmap.BackBuffer and per frame update :

    Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
    {
       _writeableBitmap.Lock();
    });
    try
    {
       ret = FFmpegInvoke.sws_scale(...);
    }
    finally
    {
       Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
       {
           _writeableBitmap.AddDirtyRect(_rect);
           _writeableBitmap.Unlock();
       });
    }

    Experiencing almost the same performance issues (tested with various DispatcherPriority).

    Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  • What is the most performant way to render unmanaged video frames in WPF ?

    18 avril 2017, par superware

    I’m using FFmpeg library to receive and decode H.264/MPEG-TS over UDP with minimal latency (something MediaElement can’t handle).

    On a dedicated FFmpeg thread, I’m pulling PixelFormats.Bgr32 video frames for display. I’ve already tried InteropBitmap :

    _section = CreateFileMapping(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, IntPtr.Zero, PAGE_READWRITE, 0, size, null);
    _buffer = MapViewOfFile(_section, FILE_MAP_ALL_ACCESS, 0, 0, size);
    Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
    {
       _interopBitmap = (InteropBitmap)Imaging.CreateBitmapSourceFromMemorySection(_section, width, height, PixelFormats.Bgr32, (int)size / height, 0);
       this.Source = _interopBitmap;
    });

    And then per frame update :

    Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
    {
       _interopBitmap.Invalidate();
    });

    But performance is quite bad (skipping frames, high CPU usage etc).

    I’ve also tried WriteableBitmap : FFmpeg is placing frames in _writeableBitmap.BackBuffer and per frame update :

    Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
    {
       _writeableBitmap.Lock();
    });
    try
    {
       ret = FFmpegInvoke.sws_scale(...);
    }
    finally
    {
       Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
       {
           _writeableBitmap.AddDirtyRect(_rect);
           _writeableBitmap.Unlock();
       });
    }

    Experiencing almost the same performance issues (tested with various DispatcherPriority).

    Any help will be greatly appreciated.