
Recherche avancée
Médias (29)
-
#7 Ambience
16 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Juin 2015
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#6 Teaser Music
16 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#5 End Title
16 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#3 The Safest Place
16 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#4 Emo Creates
15 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#2 Typewriter Dance
15 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
Autres articles (65)
-
Supporting all media types
13 avril 2011, parUnlike most software and media-sharing platforms, MediaSPIP aims to manage as many different media types as possible. The following are just a few examples from an ever-expanding list of supported formats : images : png, gif, jpg, bmp and more audio : MP3, Ogg, Wav and more video : AVI, MP4, OGV, mpg, mov, wmv and more text, code and other data : OpenOffice, Microsoft Office (Word, PowerPoint, Excel), web (html, CSS), LaTeX, Google Earth and (...)
-
Participer à sa traduction
10 avril 2011Vous pouvez nous aider à améliorer les locutions utilisées dans le logiciel ou à traduire celui-ci dans n’importe qu’elle nouvelle langue permettant sa diffusion à de nouvelles communautés linguistiques.
Pour ce faire, on utilise l’interface de traduction de SPIP où l’ensemble des modules de langue de MediaSPIP sont à disposition. ll vous suffit de vous inscrire sur la liste de discussion des traducteurs pour demander plus d’informations.
Actuellement MediaSPIP n’est disponible qu’en français et (...) -
Des sites réalisés avec MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parCette page présente quelques-uns des sites fonctionnant sous MediaSPIP.
Vous pouvez bien entendu ajouter le votre grâce au formulaire en bas de page.
Sur d’autres sites (12853)
-
Streaming a webcam to a web server to be streamed on web
19 octobre 2012, par gazzwi86I intend on streaming a web cam from a Raspberry Pi to a server, which can then serve the stream up to users over the web. I would ideally like the stream to work across all browsers with minimal complication, so the current mjpeg format I presume would not be ideal.
Firstly, I would like to know if ffmpeg is the right tool for the job as its what I'm experimenting with at the moment ? I also looked at using ffmpeg and motion but didnt see the need for motion as I don't need motion detection. My config for ffmpeg is listed below :
I installed via apt-get :
apt-get install ffmpeg
I have create a config file /etc/ffserver.conf containing the following :
Port 80
BindAddress 0.0.0.0
MaxClients 10
MaxBandwidth 50000
NoDaemon
<feed>
file /tmp/webcam.ffm
FileMaxSize 10M
</feed>
<stream>
Feed webcam.ffm
Format mpjpeg
VideoSize 640x480
VideoFrameRate 15
VideoBitRate 2000
VideoQMin 1
VideoQMax 10
strict -1
</stream>I have created a file in the sbin called webcam.sh containing the following :
ffserver -f /etc/ffserver.conf & ffmpeg -v verbose -r 5 -s 640x480 -f video4linux2 -i /dev/video0 http://localhost/webcam.ffm
Running the above starts the stream but at the moment viewing http://webcam.mjpeg starts a file downloading which seems not to start in chrome and doing the same with and html file with the stream in a img tag doesnt work.
-
What is the most performant way to render unmanaged video frames in WPF ?
27 mai 2017, par superwareI’m using FFmpeg library to receive and decode H.264/MPEG-TS over UDP with minimal latency (something MediaElement can’t handle).
On a dedicated FFmpeg thread, I’m pulling PixelFormats.Bgr32 video frames for display. I’ve already tried InteropBitmap :
_section = CreateFileMapping(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, IntPtr.Zero, PAGE_READWRITE, 0, size, null);
_buffer = MapViewOfFile(_section, FILE_MAP_ALL_ACCESS, 0, 0, size);
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_interopBitmap = (InteropBitmap)Imaging.CreateBitmapSourceFromMemorySection(_section, width, height, PixelFormats.Bgr32, (int)size / height, 0);
this.Source = _interopBitmap;
});And then per frame update :
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_interopBitmap.Invalidate();
});But performance is quite bad (skipping frames, high CPU usage etc).
I’ve also tried WriteableBitmap : FFmpeg is placing frames in _writeableBitmap.BackBuffer and per frame update :
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_writeableBitmap.Lock();
});
try
{
ret = FFmpegInvoke.sws_scale(...);
}
finally
{
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_writeableBitmap.AddDirtyRect(_rect);
_writeableBitmap.Unlock();
});
}Experiencing almost the same performance issues (tested with various DispatcherPriority).
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
-
What is the most performant way to render unmanaged video frames in WPF ?
18 avril 2017, par superwareI’m using FFmpeg library to receive and decode H.264/MPEG-TS over UDP with minimal latency (something MediaElement can’t handle).
On a dedicated FFmpeg thread, I’m pulling PixelFormats.Bgr32 video frames for display. I’ve already tried InteropBitmap :
_section = CreateFileMapping(INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, IntPtr.Zero, PAGE_READWRITE, 0, size, null);
_buffer = MapViewOfFile(_section, FILE_MAP_ALL_ACCESS, 0, 0, size);
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_interopBitmap = (InteropBitmap)Imaging.CreateBitmapSourceFromMemorySection(_section, width, height, PixelFormats.Bgr32, (int)size / height, 0);
this.Source = _interopBitmap;
});And then per frame update :
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_interopBitmap.Invalidate();
});But performance is quite bad (skipping frames, high CPU usage etc).
I’ve also tried WriteableBitmap : FFmpeg is placing frames in _writeableBitmap.BackBuffer and per frame update :
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_writeableBitmap.Lock();
});
try
{
ret = FFmpegInvoke.sws_scale(...);
}
finally
{
Dispatcher.Invoke((Action)delegate()
{
_writeableBitmap.AddDirtyRect(_rect);
_writeableBitmap.Unlock();
});
}Experiencing almost the same performance issues (tested with various DispatcherPriority).
Any help will be greatly appreciated.