Recherche avancée

Médias (21)

Mot : - Tags -/Nine Inch Nails

Autres articles (103)

  • Creating farms of unique websites

    13 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
    This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)

  • Publier sur MédiaSpip

    13 juin 2013

    Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
    Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir

  • Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins

    27 avril 2010, par

    Mediaspip core
    autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs

Sur d’autres sites (13420)

  • avcodec/vaapi : mask unused bits in bitplane_present.value

    25 février 2018, par Jerome Borsboom
    avcodec/vaapi : mask unused bits in bitplane_present.value
    

    Due to the union construct, unused bits in bitplane_present.value might
    be uninitialized even when the used bits are all set to a value.
    Masking the unused bits prevents spurious true values when all used
    bits are unset, e.g. skipped pictures.

    Signed-off-by : Jerome Borsboom <jerome.borsboom@carpalis.nl>

    • [DH] libavcodec/vaapi_vc1.c
  • Revision 75d77e36db : Fix the all intra modes mask constant. The new constant expands to 0x3fc00808.

    28 mai 2014, par Alex Converse

    Changed Paths :
     Modify /vp9/encoder/vp9_rdopt.c



    Fix the all intra modes mask constant.

    The new constant expands to 0x3fc00808.

    Change-Id : Ib5109e4faf035fe0402b59f8a8d2e412628b9276

  • Using ffmpeg alphamerge to mask two images before calculating similarity index [closed]

    12 août 2024, par user2814357

    I'm working on a script that removes duplicate frames from images stored on disk. I need to ignore certain irrelevant parts of the images.

    &#xA;

    The following ffmpeg command line should work, but it returns the same SSIM statistics as without mask.

    &#xA;

    ffmpeg -i 1.webp -i 2.webp -i mask.png -filter_complex \&#xA;"[0][2]alphamerge[img1]; \&#xA; [1][2]alphamerge[img2]; \&#xA; [img1]format=yuva420p[masked1]; \&#xA; [img2]format=yuva420p[masked2]; \&#xA; [masked1][masked2]ssim=stats_file=-" -f null -&#xA;

    &#xA;

    Example output :

    &#xA;

    [Parsed_ssim_4 @ 0x7fb76b70ff00] SSIM Y:0.829392 (7.680003) U:0.987882 (19.165656) V:0.993201 (21.675403) All:0.883108 (9.322165)&#xA;[out#0/null @ 0x7fb76c604700] video:0KiB audio:0KiB subtitle:0KiB other streams:0KiB global headers:0KiB muxing overhead: unknown&#xA;frame=    1 fps=0.0 q=-0.0 Lsize=N/A time=00:00:00.04 bitrate=N/A speed=0.602x    &#xA;&#xA;

    &#xA;

    Result is the same with ffmpeg -i 1.webp -i 2.webp  -lavfi ssim=stats_file=- -f null -.

    &#xA;

    [Parsed_ssim_0 @ 0x7f9c0cf06d80] SSIM Y:0.829392 (7.680003) U:0.987882 (19.165656) V:0.993201 (21.675403) All:0.883108 (9.322165)&#xA;[out#0/null @ 0x7f9c0da08e80] video:0KiB audio:0KiB subtitle:0KiB other streams:0KiB global headers:0KiB muxing overhead: unknown&#xA;

    &#xA;

    This is weird because the masked output files look as expected if I output them with :

    &#xA;

    ffmpeg -i 1.webp -i 2.webp -i mask.png -filter_complex \&#xA;"[0][2]alphamerge[img1]; \&#xA; [1][2]alphamerge[img2]; \&#xA; [img1]format=yuva420p[masked1]; \&#xA; [img2]format=yuva420p[masked2]" \&#xA;-map "[masked1]" masked_1.webp \&#xA;-map "[masked2]" masked_2.webp&#xA;

    &#xA;

    Does anyone know what the right syntax would be for getting the SSIM values from a single command using a mask ?

    &#xA;

    Side note : If I use -map "[masked1]" masked_1.jpg it outputs the original picture, not the masked one. Could there be a problem in the ffmpeg pipeline ?

    &#xA;

    Thank you very much !

    &#xA;