
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
The pirate bay depuis la Belgique
1er avril 2013, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
Autres articles (84)
-
MediaSPIP version 0.1 Beta
16 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta est la première version de MediaSPIP décrétée comme "utilisable".
Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
Pour avoir une installation fonctionnelle, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...) -
MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version
25 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...) -
Amélioration de la version de base
13 septembre 2013Jolie sélection multiple
Le plugin Chosen permet d’améliorer l’ergonomie des champs de sélection multiple. Voir les deux images suivantes pour comparer.
Il suffit pour cela d’activer le plugin Chosen (Configuration générale du site > Gestion des plugins), puis de configurer le plugin (Les squelettes > Chosen) en activant l’utilisation de Chosen dans le site public et en spécifiant les éléments de formulaires à améliorer, par exemple select[multiple] pour les listes à sélection multiple (...)
Sur d’autres sites (12648)
-
ffmpeg concat drops audio frames
5 octobre 2017, par ShaunI have an mp4 file and I want to take two sequential sections of the video out and render them as individual files, later recombining them back into the original video. For instance, with my video
video.mp4
, I can runffmpeg -i video.mp4 -ss 56 -t 4 out1.mp4
ffmpeg -i video.mp4 -ss 60 -t 4 out2.mp4creating
out1.mp4
which contains 00:00:56 to 00:01:00 ofvideo.mp4
, andout2.mp4
which contains 00:01:00 to 00:01:04. However, later I want to be able to recombine them again quickly (i.e., without reencoding), so I use the concat demuxer,ffmpeg -f concat -safe 0 -i files.txt -c copy concat.mp4
where
files.txt
containsfile out1.mp4
file out2.mp4which theoretically should give me back 00:00:56 to 00:01:04 of
video.mp4
, however there are always dropped audio frames where the concatenation occurs, creating a very unpleasant sound artifact, an audio blip, if you will.I have tried using
async
and-af apad
on initially creating the two sections of the video but I am still faced with the same problem, and have not found the solution elsewhere. I have experienced this issue in multiple different use cases, so hopefully this simple example will shed some light on the real problem. -
displaying a baseline h264 frames stream in browsers
6 août 2021, par Thabet SabhaSo, I have a server that receives a live rtsp stream then generates baseline h264 frames using ffmpeg, which then are sent via an rtcDataChannel to browser, and while the frames arrive as intended, I can't figure out a way to display them on my html5 videoElement,
here is a simplified version of my current approach :


const remoteStream = new MediaSource();
myVideoElement.src = window.URL.createObjectURL(remoteStream);

// called when remoteStream.readyState === "open"
let sourceBuffer = remoteStream.addSourceBuffer('video/mp4; codecs="avc1.4d002a"');

// this gets called when ever a new frame is received from the webrtc data channel.
function onFrame(frame) {
 sourceBuffer.appendBuffer(new Uint8Array(frame));

 /*
 console.log(frame) ==> <buffer 00="00" 01="01" 41="41" 9b="9b" a0="a0" 22="22" 80="80" a5="a5" d7="d7" 42="42" ea="ea" 34="34" 14="14" 85="85" ba="ba" bc="bc" 1b="1b" f2="f2" 71="71" 0d="0d" 8b="8b" e1="e1" 3c="3c" 52="52" d5="d5" 8c="8c" ef="ef" c1="c1" 89="89" 10="10" c5="c5" 05="05" 78="78" ee="ee" 1d="1d" 03="03" 8d="8d" 2896="2896" more="more" bytes="bytes">
 */
}
</buffer>


ffmpeg options :


[
 "-rtsp_transport", "tcp",
 "-i", `${rtspCamURL}`, 
 "-framerate", "15",
 "-c:v", "libx264",
 "-vprofile", "baseline",
 "-b:v", "600k",
 "-bufsize", "600k",
 "-pix_fmt", "yuv420p",
 '-tune', 'zerolatency',
 "-preset", "ultrafast",
 "-f", "rawvideo",
 '-'
]; 



ffmpeg stream is then split using NAL delimiter (to generate individual frames) then each frame is sent via the data channel like so :

Buffer.concat([nalDelimiter, frame])
.

I am not sure if i'm missing something as i'm not getting any helpful errors due to the remoteSource closing as soon as the first frame arrives for some reason.


or does the media source just not support raw h264 frames, and if so is there a workaround to solve this issue ? (even if it has to do with changing the ffmpeg params.


-
Bash : sort find results using part of a filename
13 novembre 2015, par utt50I have 3 webcams set up in a building, uploading still images to a webserver. I’m using ffmpeg to encode the jpgs to mp4 video.
The directories are set up like this :
Cam1/201504
Cam1/201505
Cam2/201504
Cam2/201505
Cam3/201504
Cam3/201505I’m using the following bash loop/ffmpeg parameters to make one video per camera, per year. This works well so far (well... except that my SSD is rapidly degrading in performance - too many simultaneous read/write operations ?) :
find Cam2/2013* -name "*.jpg" -print0 | xargs -0 cat | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 30 -vcodec mjpeg -i - -vcodec libx264 -profile:v baseline -level 3.0 -movflags +faststart -crf 19 -pix_fmt yuv420p -r 30 "Cam2-2013-30fps-19crf.mp4"
The individual files are named like this (confusing ffmpeg’s built-in file sequencer) :
Cam1_2015052413543201.jpg
Cam1_2015052413544601.jpg
Cam2_2015052413032601.jpg
Cam2_2015052413544901.jpgI now need to create one video for an entire year across all 3 cameras, ordered by timestamp. To accomplish this, I need to sort the find results by the segment of the filename after the underscore.
What do I pipe the find output to to accomplish this ? For example, the files above would be ordered like this :
Cam2_2015052413032601.jpg
Cam1_2015052413543201.jpg
Cam1_2015052413544601.jpg
Cam2_2015052413544901.jpgAny help is very much appreciated !