
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Somos millones 1
21 juillet 2014, par
Mis à jour : Juin 2015
Langue : français
Type : Video
Autres articles (15)
-
Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins
27 avril 2010, parMediaspip core
autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs -
MediaSPIP v0.2
21 juin 2013, parMediaSPIP 0.2 est la première version de MediaSPIP stable.
Sa date de sortie officielle est le 21 juin 2013 et est annoncée ici.
Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
Comme pour la version précédente, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...) -
MediaSPIP v0.2
21 juin 2013, parMediaSPIP 0.2 is the first MediaSPIP stable release.
Its official release date is June 21, 2013 and is announced here.
The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...)
Sur d’autres sites (4277)
-
How to choose gpu among multiple nvidia gpu in ffmpeg 3.2.0 ?
4 mai 2017, par jsBaeki’m currently using two nvidia p4 graphic cards.
In previous version of ffmpeg(before 3.2.0), i could choose specific gpu card by using options "-gpu 0 or 1 etc".
In current version, however, there’s no option for selecting gpu card.
Actually there’s "gpu" option specified in nvenc_h264.c or nvenc_hevc.c.
But in nvenc.c file, there’s no code that uses "gpu" option.
Is there any way that i can choose specific card ?
How load balancing between two cards is done ?
Is it done in driver level ?
Thank you.
-
avfilter/phase_template : Fix left-shift of negative numbers
6 novembre 2022, par Andreas Rheinhardt -
swresample/resample : speed up build_filter by 50%
4 novembre 2015, par Ganesh Ajjanagaddeswresample/resample : speed up build_filter by 50%
This speeds up build_filter by 50%. This gain should be pretty
consistent across all architectures and platforms.Essentially, this relies on a observation that the filters have some
even/odd symmetry that may be exploited during the construction of the
polyphase filter bank. In particular, phases (scaled to [0, 1]) in [0.5, 1] are
easily derived from [0, 0.5] and expensive reevaluation of function
points are unnecessary. This requires some rather annoying even/odd
bookkeeping as can be seen from the patch.I vaguely recall from signal processing theory more general symmetries allowing even greater
optimization of the construction. At a high level, "even functions"
correspond to 2, and one can imagine variations. Nevertheless, for the sake
of some generality and because of existing filters, this is all that is
being exploited.Currently, this patch relies on phase_count being even or (trivially) 1,
though this is not an inherent limitation to the approach. This
assumption is safe as phase_count is 1 << phase_bits, and is hence a
power of two. There is no way for user API to set it to a nontrivial odd
number. This assumption has been placed as an assert in the code.To repeat, this assumes even symmetry of the filters, which is the most common
way to get generalized linear phase anyway and is true of all currently
supported filters.As a side note, accuracy should be identical or perhaps slightly better
due to this "forcing" filter symmetries leading to a better phase
characteristic. As before, I can’t test this claim easily, though it may
be of interest.Patch tested with FATE.
Sample benchmark (x86-64, Haswell, GNU/Linux) :
test : swr-resample-dblp-44100-2626
new :
527376779 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000), 256 runs, 0 skips
524361765 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000), 512 runs, 0 skips
516552574 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000), 1024 runs, 0 skipsold :
974178658 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000), 256 runs, 0 skips
972794408 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000), 512 runs, 0 skips
954350046 decicycles in build_filter(loop 1000), 1024 runs, 0 skipsNote that lower level optimizations are entirely possible, I focussed on
getting the high level semantics correct. In any case, this should
provide a good foundation.Reviewed-by : Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
Signed-off-by : Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde@gmail.com>