
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (105)
-
MediaSPIP v0.2
21 juin 2013, parMediaSPIP 0.2 est la première version de MediaSPIP stable.
Sa date de sortie officielle est le 21 juin 2013 et est annoncée ici.
Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
Comme pour la version précédente, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...) -
Le profil des utilisateurs
12 avril 2011, parChaque utilisateur dispose d’une page de profil lui permettant de modifier ses informations personnelle. Dans le menu de haut de page par défaut, un élément de menu est automatiquement créé à l’initialisation de MediaSPIP, visible uniquement si le visiteur est identifié sur le site.
L’utilisateur a accès à la modification de profil depuis sa page auteur, un lien dans la navigation "Modifier votre profil" est (...) -
MediaSPIP version 0.1 Beta
16 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta est la première version de MediaSPIP décrétée comme "utilisable".
Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
Pour avoir une installation fonctionnelle, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...)
Sur d’autres sites (17115)
-
understanding HEVC NAL SEI termination and byte alignment parsing with ffmpeg
3 mars, par rodeomaconThe NAL SEI timecode message I am currently writing to file is
00 00 01 4E 01 88 06 XX XX XX XX XX 10 80
(The termination portion being10 80
, payloadSize set to 0x06 and the XX bytes being an encoding of the frames/seconds/minutes/hours).

My goal is to read the timecode with
ffmpeg -i video.h265 -c:v copy -bsf:v trace_headers -f null -
andffprobe -show_frames video.mov
with no errors.

The 3 left most 0 bits of the final 0x10 byte are the conclusion of the time_offset_length (Equal to 0) data. Following this, I am intending to have a rbsp_stop_one_bit followed by four rbsp_alignment_zero_bits to result in byte alignment.


With this termination configuration (No trailing 0x80 byte and the payloadSize set to 0x05 like
00 00 01 4E 01 88 05 XX XX XX XX XX 10
), ffmpeg reportsInvalid value at time_offset_length[i]: bitstream ended
.

With the addition of the trailing 0x80 byte and changing the payloadSize to 0x06 to match, ffmpeg does not throw a warning but instead indicates there are extra, unused bits :


[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] Prefix Supplemental Enhancement Information
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 0 forbidden_zero_bit 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 1 nal_unit_type 100111 = 39
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 7 nuh_layer_id 000000 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 13 nuh_temporal_id_plus1 001 = 1
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 16 last_payload_type_byte 10001000 = 136
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 24 last_payload_size_byte 00000110 = 6
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] Time Code
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 32 num_clock_ts 01 = 1
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 34 clock_timestamp_flag[0] 1 = 1
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 35 units_field_based_flag[0] 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 36 counting_type[0] 00000 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 41 full_timestamp_flag[0] 1 = 1
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 42 discontinuity_flag[0] 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 43 cnt_dropped_flag[0] 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 44 n_frames[0] 000110101 = 53
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 53 seconds_value[0] 010010 = 18
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 59 minutes_value[0] 010100 = 20
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 65 hours_value[0] 01010 = 10
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 70 time_offset_length[0] 00000 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 75 bit_equal_to_one 1 = 1
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 76 bit_equal_to_zero 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 77 bit_equal_to_zero 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 78 bit_equal_to_zero 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 79 bit_equal_to_zero 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 80 rbsp_stop_one_bit 1 = 1
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 81 rbsp_alignment_zero_bit 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 82 rbsp_alignment_zero_bit 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 83 rbsp_alignment_zero_bit 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 84 rbsp_alignment_zero_bit 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 85 rbsp_alignment_zero_bit 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 86 rbsp_alignment_zero_bit 0 = 0
[trace_headers @ 0000015aff793a80] 87 rbsp_alignment_zero_bit 0 = 0



Without the
bit_equal_to_one
, ffmpeg gives a generic errorFailed to read unit 0 (type 39)
after reading the time_offset_length correctly.

What is the meaning of
bit_equal_to_one
andbit_equal_to_zero
in this context and is this the intended SEI termination method ? Why are those bits not parsed as the alignment bits ?

-
NDK r8c warning for asm objects regarding "Cortex-A8 erratum" - should I be worried ?
7 décembre 2012, par Alex CohnQuestion : What is the meaning of this warning ? If there are no real-life consequences, I can live with it for a while... But I am concerned with what will happen if our program gets loaded on one of the faulty chips.
Background : With NDK r8c, linking of X264 encoder issues warnings :
cannot scan executable section 1 of libx264.a(dct-a.o) for Cortex-A8 erratum because it has no mapping symbols
... same warning for all assembly files in libx264.
libx264.a itself was cross-compiled on the same machine with the same 4.6 toolchain taken from NDK.
Here are the instructions to easily reproduce the problem (Ubuntu or MacOS) :
-
Download x264-snapshot-20121203-2245 from ftp://ftp.videolan.org/pub/x264/snapshots/last_x264.tar.bz2
-
Run
./configure --enable-pic --enable-strip --enable-static --cross-prefix=~/android-ndk-r8c/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.6/prebuilt/linux-x86/bin/arm-linux-androideabi- --sysroot=~/android-ndk-r8c/platforms/android-14/arch-arm --host=arm-linux
-
Run
~/android-ndk-r8c/prebuilt/linux-x86/bin/make
It will build the static library, and after that display the Cortex-A8 warning while linking the x265 executable. I am not worried about the compiler warnings, because building libx264.a is done offline, it is not part of our official daily build.
I have reported this as http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=40794.
I tried to add the mapping symbols manually to
dct-a.S
following the ARM.com instructions, but this had no effect. -
-
Different code(.java file) for different platform ?
2 mars 2016, par AR792I have a code where image data is passed from bitmap to FFmpeg frame recorder and converted to a video. But i need to make small changes while running it on LG G3(armv7) from Asus zenfone 5(x86).
Following are the class variables that create the issue :(declared under, class Main Activity)
inputWidth = 1024 ;
inputHeight = 650 ;
Following is the method where the issue occurs :
byte [] getNV21(int inputWidth, int inputHeight, Bitmap bitmap) {
int [] argb = new int[inputWidth * inputHeight];
bitmap.getPixels(argb, 0, inputWidth, 0, 0, inputWidth, inputHeight);
byte [] yuv = new byte[inputWidth*inputHeight*3/2];
encodeYUV420SP(yuv, argb, inputWidth, inputHeight);
return yuv;
}
void encodeYUV420SP(byte[] yuv420sp, int[] argb, int width, int height) {
final int frameSize = width * height;
int yIndex = 0;
int uvIndex = frameSize;
int a, R, G, B, Y, U, V;
int index = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < height; j++) {
for (int i = 0; i < width; i++) {
a = (argb[index] & 0xff000000) >> 24; // a is not used obviously
R = (argb[index] & 0xff0000) >> 16;
G = (argb[index] & 0xff00) >> 8;
B = (argb[index] & 0xff) >> 0;
// well known RGB to YUV algorithm
Y = ( ( 66 * R + 129 * G + 25 * B + 128) >> 8) + 16;
U = ( ( -38 * R - 74 * G + 112 * B + 128) >> 8) + 128;
V = ( ( 112 * R - 94 * G - 18 * B + 128) >> 8) + 128;
// NV21 has a plane of Y and interleaved planes of VU each sampled by a factor of 2
// meaning for every 4 Y pixels there are 1 V and 1 U. Note the sampling is every other
// pixel AND every other scanline.
yuv420sp[yIndex++] = (byte) ((Y < 0) ? 0 : ((Y > 255) ? 255 : Y));
if (j % 2 == 0 && index % 2 == 0) {
yuv420sp[uvIndex++] = (byte)((V<0) ? 0 : ((V > 255) ? 255 : V));
yuv420sp[uvIndex++] = (byte)((U<0) ? 0 : ((U > 255) ? 255 : U));
}
index ++;
}
}
}Working CODE :
LG G3 :I can use the above variables at any place in the code to get the required output.
Bitmap size returned = 2734200Asus Zenfone 5 : Except at creating the bitmap, I have to use everywhere else bitmap.getHeight() and bitmap.getWidth(), to get the required output.
Surprisingly here Bitmap size returned = 725760 (So its not setting according to set bitmap parameters ?)
INCORRECT CODE :
LG G3 : IF i use bitmap.getHeight() and bitmap.getWidth(), i get java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException : length = 102354 , index = 102354. @getNV21 method
Asus Zenfone 5 : If i use inputWidth , inputHeight i get
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException : x + width must be <= bitmap.width() @getNV21 methodHow can i generalize the above code for both phones ?