
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Rennes Emotion Map 2010-11
19 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Juillet 2013
Langue : français
Type : Texte
Autres articles (64)
-
Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins
27 avril 2010, parMediaspip core
autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs -
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir -
HTML5 audio and video support
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...)
Sur d’autres sites (9578)
-
ffpmeg vs ffprobe performance
5 octobre 2023, par ThomasI wanted to try extracting frames at scene changes with ffmpeg, vs. getting the frame numbers with ffprobe and extracting them later.



But I had a surprise : ffprobe seems to be much slower than ffmpeg, while ffmpeg is taking the frames, resizing and saving them as well.



ffmpeg command line :



ffmpeg -hide_banner -y -i d:/test/m/long.mkv -vf "select=gt(scene\,0.4), showinfo, scale=320:-1, tile=12x200" -vsync 0 thumbnails%03d.png




this takes : 488 seconds



ffprobe command line :



ffprobe -show_frames -of compact=p=0 -f lavfi "movie=/test/m/long.mkv,select=gt(scene\,.4)"




this takes : 899 seconds



I am missing something ?


-
ffpmeg vs ffprobe performance
13 décembre 2016, par ThomasI wanted to try extracting frames at scene changes with ffmpeg, vs. getting the frame numbers with ffprobe and extracting them later.
But I had a surprise : ffprobe seems to be much slower than ffmpeg, while ffmpeg is taking the frames, resizing and saving them as well.
ffmpeg command line :
ffmpeg -hide_banner -y -i d:/test/m/long.mkv -vf "select=gt(scene\,0.4), showinfo, scale=320:-1, tile=12x200" -vsync 0 thumbnails%03d.png
this takes : 488 seconds
ffprobe command line :
ffprobe -show_frames -of compact=p=0 -f lavfi "movie=/test/m/long.mkv,select=gt(scene\,.4)"
this takes : 899 seconds
I am missing something ?
-
FFMPEG, How to concat mp4 files with different fps to create final video with different fps
9 octobre 2019, par Newbie EngineerI am using following commands
images to video
ffmpeg.exe -r 5 -f image2 -s 960x720 -i D :/images%2d.PNG -vcodec libx264 -crf 25 -pix_fmt yuv420p D :/tester.mp4
I created several mp4 with different fps(5, 10, 15, 20...), and created a list of mp4 files name with different FPS, then tried to concat using
ffmpeg -f concat -i D :/mylist.txt -c copy final.mp4
But this is not concatenating properly, last couple of mp4 files are not being joined properly and there is always two or three seconds gap between each joined mp4 files. Wondering if any one has dealt with this issue. I want to keep the FPS of each single mp4 files as it is, trying to get smooth final video with progressing fps like 5, 10, 15, 20.. FPS).
FFMPEG version 4.2.1, (no audio involved)