Recherche avancée

Médias (3)

Mot : - Tags -/Valkaama

Autres articles (52)

  • Submit bugs and patches

    13 avril 2011

    Unfortunately a software is never perfect.
    If you think you have found a bug, report it using our ticket system. Please to help us to fix it by providing the following information : the browser you are using, including the exact version as precise an explanation as possible of the problem if possible, the steps taken resulting in the problem a link to the site / page in question
    If you think you have solved the bug, fill in a ticket and attach to it a corrective patch.
    You may also (...)

  • Gestion générale des documents

    13 mai 2011, par

    MédiaSPIP ne modifie jamais le document original mis en ligne.
    Pour chaque document mis en ligne il effectue deux opérations successives : la création d’une version supplémentaire qui peut être facilement consultée en ligne tout en laissant l’original téléchargeable dans le cas où le document original ne peut être lu dans un navigateur Internet ; la récupération des métadonnées du document original pour illustrer textuellement le fichier ;
    Les tableaux ci-dessous expliquent ce que peut faire MédiaSPIP (...)

  • Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins

    27 avril 2010, par

    Mediaspip core
    autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs

Sur d’autres sites (5008)

  • How to write UI tests for your plugin – Introducing the Piwik Platform

    18 février 2015, par Thomas Steur — Development

    This is the next post of our blog series where we introduce the capabilities of the Piwik platform (our previous post was How to write unit tests for your plugin). This time you’ll learn how to write UI tests in Piwik. For this tutorial you will need to have basic knowledge of JavaScript and the Piwik platform.

    What is a UI test ?

    Some might know a UI test under the term ‘CSS test’ or ‘screenshot test’. When we speak of UI tests we mean automated tests that capture a screenshot of a URL and then compare the result with an expected image. If the images are not exactly the same the test will fail. For more information read our blog post about UI Testing.

    What is a UI test good for ?

    We use them to test our PHP Controllers, Twig templates, CSS, and indirectly test our JavaScript. We do usually not write Unit or Integration tests for our controllers. For example we use UI tests to ensure that the installation, the login and the update process works as expected. We also have tests for most pages, reports, settings, etc. This increases the quality of our product and saves us a lot of time as it is easy to write and maintain such tests. All UI tests are executed on Travis after each commit and compared with our expected screenshots.

    Getting started

    In this post, we assume that you have already installed Piwik 2.11.0 or later via git, set up your development environment and created a plugin. If not, visit the Piwik Developer Zone where you’ll find the tutorial Setting up Piwik and other Guides that help you to develop a plugin.

    Next you need to install the needed packages to execute UI tests.

    Let’s create a UI test

    We start by using the Piwik Console to create a new UI test :

    ./console generate:test --testtype ui

    The command will ask you to enter the name of the plugin the created test should belong to. I will use the plugin name “Widgetize”. Next it will ask you for the name of the test. Here you usually enter the name of the page or report you want to test. I will use the name “WidgetizePage” in this example. There should now be a file plugins/Widgetize/tests/UI/WidgetizePage_spec.js which contains already an example to get you started easily :

    describe("WidgetizePage", function () {
       var generalParams = 'idSite=1&period=day&date=2010-01-03';

       it('should load a simple page by its module and action', function (done) {
           var screenshotName = 'simplePage';
           // will save image in "processed-ui-screenshots/WidgetizePageTest_simplePage.png"

           expect.screenshot(screenshotName).to.be.capture(function (page) {
               var urlToTest = "?" + generalParams + "&module=Widgetize&action=index";
               page.load(urlToTest);
           }, done);
       });
    });

    What is happening here ?

    This example declares a new set of specs by calling the method describe(name, callback) and within that a new spec by calling the method it(description, func). Within the spec we load a URL and once loaded capture a screenshot of the whole page. The captured screenshot will be saved under the defined screenshotName. You might have noticed we write our UI tests in BDD style.

    Capturing only a part of the page

    It is good practice to not always capture the full page. For example many pages contain a menu and if you change that menu, all your screenshot tests would fail. To avoid this you would instead have a separate test for your menu. To capture only a part of the page simply specify a jQuery selector and call the method captureSelector instead of capture :

    var contentSelector = '#selector1, .selector2 .selector3';
    // Only the content of both selectors will be in visible in the captured screenshot
    expect.screenshot('page_partial').to.be.captureSelector(contentSelector, function (page) {
       page.load(urlToTest);
    }, done);

    Hiding content

    There is a known issue with sparklines that can fail tests randomly. Also version numbers or a date that changes from time to time can fail tests without actually having an error. To avoid this you can prevent elements from being visible in the captured screenshot via CSS as we add a CSS class called uiTest to the HTML element while tests are running.

    .uiTest .version { visibility:hidden }

    Running a test

    To run the previously generated tests we will use the command tests:run-ui :

    ./console tests:run-ui WidgetizePage

    After running the tests for the first time you will notice a new folder plugins/PLUGINNAME/tests/UI/processed-ui-screenshots in your plugin. If everything worked, there will be an image for every captured screenshot. If you’re happy with the result it is time to copy the file over to the expected-ui-screenshots folder, otherwise you have to adjust your test until you get the result you want. From now on, the newly captured screenshots will be compared with the expected images whenever you execute the tests.

    Fixing a test

    At some point your UI test will fail, for example due to expected CSS changes. To fix a test all you have to do is to copy the captured screenshot from the folder processed-ui-screenshots to the folder expected-ui-screenshots.

    Executing the UI tests on Travis

    In case you have not generated a .travis.yml file for your plugin yet you can do this by executing the following command :

    ./console generate:travis-yml --plugin PLUGINNAME

    Next you have to activate Travis for your repository.

    Advanced features

    Isn’t it easy to create a UI test ? We never even created a file ! Of course you can accomplish even more if you want. For example you can specify a fixture to be inserted before running the tests which is useful when your plugin requires custom data. You can also control the browser as it was a human by clicking, moving the mouse, typing text, etc. If you want to discover more features have a look at our existing test cases.

    If you have any feedback regarding our APIs or our guides in the Developer Zone feel free to send it to us.

  • ffmpeg converted mp4 files won't play on videojs

    11 février 2018, par Ricky

    I am trying to convert an hls source to mp4 but the ouputted file won’t play on any internet video players. Currently I am using videojs

    here is how I am converting it.

    ffmpeg -re -i "https://mnmedias.api.telequebec.tv/m3u8/29880.m3u8" -c:v libx264 -c:a copy -movflags +faststart ./public/videos/cut-videos/knife/parlet.mp4

    the video player is outputting this :

    video.js:498 VIDEOJS : ERROR : (CODE:4 MEDIA_ERR_SRC_NOT_SUPPORTED) The media could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.

  • Detect if an interlaced video frame is the Top or Bottom field ?

    21 décembre 2024, par Danny

    I'm decoding video PES packets (packetized elementary stream) containing H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC using libavcodec like this :

    


    while (remainingESBytes > 0)
{
    int bytesUsed = av_parser_parse2(
            mpParser, mpDecContext,
            &mpEncPacket->data, &mpEncPacket->size,
            pIn, remainingESBytes,
            AV_NOPTS_VALUE, AV_NOPTS_VALUE, 0);

    // send encoded packet for decoding
    int ret = avcodec_send_packet(mpDecContext, mpEncPacket);
    if (ret < 0)
    {
        // failed
        continue;
    }

    while (ret >= 0)
    {
        ret = avcodec_receive_frame(mpDecContext, mpDecFrame);
        /// Do stuff with frame ///
    }

    remainingESBytes = getMoreBytes()
}


    


    Sometimes the input video is interlaced, in which case it seems avcodec_receive_frame is returning individual fields and not a merged frame of the top and bottom fields together.

    


    I couldn't find any way for avcodec_receive_frame to emit a full, non-interlaced frame.

    


    I can merge a top and bottom field together but I haven't found any way to identify if a given AVFrame is top or bottom.

    


    How can I do that ?

    


    EDIT I

    


    Looking at the log output from the decoder, it appears the decoder knows if the field is top or bottom (carried by SEI ?) but still can't figure out how to access that information via the libavcodec API...

    


    [hevc @ 0x1afcfc0] ENTER DECODE NAL TYPE 39. sei.ni_custom.type = -1
[hevc @ 0x1afcfc0] Set sei.ni_custom.type to -1.
[hevc @ 0x1afcfc0] ff_hevc_decode_nal_sei - s->ni_custom.type = -1
[hevc @ 0x1afcfc0] Decoding SEI [NAL Type 39]. ni_custom.type=-1
[hevc @ 0x1afcfc0] TOP Field
[hevc @ 0x1afcfc0] EXIT DECODE NAL TYPE 39. sei.ni_custom.type = -1