Recherche avancée

Médias (1)

Mot : - Tags -/biomaping

Autres articles (77)

  • Keeping control of your media in your hands

    13 avril 2011, par

    The vocabulary used on this site and around MediaSPIP in general, aims to avoid reference to Web 2.0 and the companies that profit from media-sharing.
    While using MediaSPIP, you are invited to avoid using words like "Brand", "Cloud" and "Market".
    MediaSPIP is designed to facilitate the sharing of creative media online, while allowing authors to retain complete control of their work.
    MediaSPIP aims to be accessible to as many people as possible and development is based on expanding the (...)

  • MediaSPIP v0.2

    21 juin 2013, par

    MediaSPIP 0.2 est la première version de MediaSPIP stable.
    Sa date de sortie officielle est le 21 juin 2013 et est annoncée ici.
    Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
    Comme pour la version précédente, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
    Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...)

  • Mise à disposition des fichiers

    14 avril 2011, par

    Par défaut, lors de son initialisation, MediaSPIP ne permet pas aux visiteurs de télécharger les fichiers qu’ils soient originaux ou le résultat de leur transformation ou encodage. Il permet uniquement de les visualiser.
    Cependant, il est possible et facile d’autoriser les visiteurs à avoir accès à ces documents et ce sous différentes formes.
    Tout cela se passe dans la page de configuration du squelette. Il vous faut aller dans l’espace d’administration du canal, et choisir dans la navigation (...)

Sur d’autres sites (6881)

  • AWS Lambda : "Unzipped size must be smaller than 106534017 bytes" after adding single file

    17 septembre 2023, par leon

    When trying to deploy my lambdas using AWS through the serverless framework I had no problems until I tried adding the ffmpeg binary.

    


    Now the ffmpeg binaries I have tried to add have ranged from 26 mb to 50 mb. Whichever I add, I get the following error :

    


    UPDATE_FAILED: WhatsappDocumentHandlerLambdaFunction (AWS::Lambda::Function)
Resource handler returned message: "Unzipped size must be smaller than 106534017 bytes (Service: Lambda, Status Code: 400, Request ID: ...)" (RequestToken: ..., HandlerErrorCode: InvalidRequest)


    


    The problem is that I did not add the file to this function. I added it to a completely different one.

    


    I have tried the following things :

    


    


    When trying every single one of these options I get the UPDATE_FAILED error in a different function that surely is not too big.

    


    I know I can deploy using a docker image but why complicate things with docker images when it should work ?

    


    I am very thankful for any ideas.

    


  • ffmpeg extract multiple frames from single input causing SIGSEGV in node.js child_process on lambda env

    11 octobre 2023, par Andrew Still

    I'm trying to dynamically extract multiple different frames from single video input. So the command I'm calling looking like this

    


    ffmpeg -loglevel debug -hide_banner -t 13.269541 -y -ss 0 -i "input-s3-url" -ss 13.269541 -i "same-input-s3-url" -map 0:v -vframes 1 /tmp/ca4cd7a3159743938c5362c171ea2cae.0.png -map 1:v -vframes 1 /tmp/ca4cd7a3159743938c5362c171ea2cae.13.269541.png


    


    It works and everything is good, until I deploy it to lambda. Even though I'm using 10gb of RAM it still failing with error. Locally it works like a charm but not on lambda. I'm not sure what the problem here but i'm regularly (not always) getting SIGSEGV

    


    at ChildProcess.exithandler (node:child_process:402:12)
at ChildProcess.emit (node:events:513:28) 
at ChildProcess.emit (node:domain:489:12)
at maybeClose (node:internal/child_process: 1100:16)
at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:304:5) 
{
code: null, 
killed: false, 
signal: 'SIGSEGV'
cmd: '/opt/bin/ffmpeg -loglevel error -hide_banner -t 131.805393 -y -ss 0 -i "https: //


    


    Double-checked memory usage and it's doesn't look like a reason, but I'm not sure how correct this number

    


    Memory size : 10240 MB Max Memory used : 140 MB

    


    I'm think maybe it's because it's making requests for each input, at least that's what I saw in debug mode, but still have no idea what's the problem here, would appreciate any suggestions/optimizations/help. Thanks

    


    ffmpeg added on lambda using this layer - https://serverlessrepo.aws.amazon.com/applications/us-east-1/145266761615/ffmpeg-lambda-layer

    


  • Carrierwave watermark a movie

    15 mai 2016, par Felix

    I’m uploading a movie with carrierwave to amazon S3. While uploading I want to watermark the movie.

    How can I do this ? How can I use stermio-ffmpeg while uploading ?

    I’m using a Rails application.