
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (80)
-
Le profil des utilisateurs
12 avril 2011, parChaque utilisateur dispose d’une page de profil lui permettant de modifier ses informations personnelle. Dans le menu de haut de page par défaut, un élément de menu est automatiquement créé à l’initialisation de MediaSPIP, visible uniquement si le visiteur est identifié sur le site.
L’utilisateur a accès à la modification de profil depuis sa page auteur, un lien dans la navigation "Modifier votre profil" est (...) -
Other interesting software
13 avril 2011, parWe don’t claim to be the only ones doing what we do ... and especially not to assert claims to be the best either ... What we do, we just try to do it well and getting better ...
The following list represents softwares that tend to be more or less as MediaSPIP or that MediaSPIP tries more or less to do the same, whatever ...
We don’t know them, we didn’t try them, but you can take a peek.
Videopress
Website : http://videopress.com/
License : GNU/GPL v2
Source code : (...) -
MediaSPIP version 0.1 Beta
16 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta est la première version de MediaSPIP décrétée comme "utilisable".
Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
Pour avoir une installation fonctionnelle, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...)
Sur d’autres sites (5357)
-
Compressing videos from a smartphone
21 septembre 2019, par fejesjocoI have a Nexus 6p with the stock camera. It’s set to record at 1080p, 30fps. Here’s a 5 second sample (11 MB).
Videos from this phone come out at about 17 Mbps on average. I tried to compress it with ffmpeg with
-c:v libx264 -crf 23 -preset veryslow
, the result comes out at about 5.5 MB, which is about 9 Mbps.I think this bitrate is a bit too much. When I look at torrent file listings, I can see high quality videos at 3 GB in size on average, and if such a movie is 90 minutes long on average, that is about 4-5 Mbps which sounds okay.
I’m wondering, why the big difference ? I can notice that my video is noisy/grainy (which is expected from a phone), and that might reduce compressibility. I tried a few ffmpeg filters, like hqdn3d and atadenoise, but the noise mostly remained (maybe I didn’t play with it enough). Then I figured, the video is also shaky (which is also expected), and that might reduce compressibility too (and even makes temporal noise filtering less effective). I tried to stabilize it with the deshake filter, but that didn’t help either.
I know I could just limit the bandwidth to whatever I like, but there must be a reason why ffmpeg thinks it needs a high bandwidth to maintain a certain quality, and a lower bandwidth would just decrease the quality.
Why do these videos have such a high bitrate ? What’s the best way to compress them more while keeping or even increasing their quality ?
-
Anomalie #2025 : Surlignage intempestif
12 mai 2011, par cedric -Une option de configuration quelque part ?
-
Your 6-step guide to increasing acquisition
2 juillet 2019, par Matomo Core Team — Analytics Tips