Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/serveur

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (61)

  • Publier sur MédiaSpip

    13 juin 2013

    Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
    Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir

  • Contribute to documentation

    13 avril 2011

    Documentation is vital to the development of improved technical capabilities.
    MediaSPIP welcomes documentation by users as well as developers - including : critique of existing features and functions articles contributed by developers, administrators, content producers and editors screenshots to illustrate the above translations of existing documentation into other languages
    To contribute, register to the project users’ mailing (...)

  • Submit bugs and patches

    13 avril 2011

    Unfortunately a software is never perfect.
    If you think you have found a bug, report it using our ticket system. Please to help us to fix it by providing the following information : the browser you are using, including the exact version as precise an explanation as possible of the problem if possible, the steps taken resulting in the problem a link to the site / page in question
    If you think you have solved the bug, fill in a ticket and attach to it a corrective patch.
    You may also (...)

Sur d’autres sites (4361)

  • Six Best Amplitude Alternatives

    10 décembre 2024, par Daniel Crough

    Product analytics is big business. Gone are the days when we could only guess what customers were doing with our products or services. Now, we can track, visualise, and analyse how they interact with them and, with that, constantly improve and optimise. 

    The problem is that many product analytics tools are expensive and complicated — especially for smaller businesses. They’re also packed with functionality more attuned to the needs of massive companies. 

    Amplitude is such a tool. It’s brilliant and it has all the bells and whistles that you’ll probably never need. Fortunately, there are alternatives. In this guide, we’ll explore the best of those alternatives and, along the way, provide the insight you’ll need to select the best analytics tool for your organisation. 

    Amplitude : a brief overview

    To set the stage, it makes sense to understand exactly what Amplitude offers. It’s a real-time data analytics tool for tracking user actions and gaining insight into engagement, retention, and revenue drivers. It helps you analyse that data and find answers to questions about what happened, why it happened, and what to do next.

    However, as good as Amplitude is, it has some significant disadvantages. While it does offer data export functionality, that seems deliberately restricted. It allows data exports for specific events, but it’s not possible to export complete data sets to manipulate or format in another tool. Even pulling it into a CSV file has a 10,000-row limit. There is an API, but not many third-party integration options.

    Getting data in can also be a problem. Amplitude requires manual tags on events that must be tracked for analysis, which can leave holes in the data if every possible subsequent action isn’t tagged. That’s a time-consuming exercise, and it’s made worse because those tags will have to be updated every time the website or app is updated. 

    As good as it is, it can also be overwhelming because it’s stacked with features that can create confusion for novice or inexperienced analysts. It’s also expensive. There is a freemium plan that limits functionality and events. Still, when an organisation wants to upgrade for additional functionality or to analyse more events, the step up to the paid plan is massive.

    Lastly, Amplitude has made some strides towards being a web analytics option, but it lacks some basic functionality that may frustrate people who are trying to see the full picture from web to app.

    Snapshot of Amplitude alternatives

    So, in place of Amplitude, what product analytics tools are available that won’t break the bank and still provide the functionality needed to improve your product ? The good news is that there are literally hundreds of alternatives, and we’ve picked out six of the best.

    1. Matomo – Best privacy-focused web and mobile analytics
    2. Mixpanel – Best for product analytics
    3. Google Analytics – Best free option
    4. Adobe Analytics – Best for predictive analytics
    5. Umami – Best lightweight tool for product analytics
    6. Heap – Best for automatic user data capture

    A more detailed analysis of the Amplitude alternatives

    Now, let’s dive deeper into each of the six Amplitude alternatives. We’ll cover standout features, integrations, pricing, use cases and community critiques. By the end, you’ll know which analytics tool can help optimise website and app performance to grow your business.

    1. Matomo – Best privacy-friendly web and app analytics

    Privacy is a big concern these days, especially for organisations with a presence in the European Union (EU). Unlike other analytics tools, Matomo ensures you comply with privacy laws and regulations, like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California’s Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

    Matomo helps businesses get the insights they need without compromising user privacy. It’s also one of the few self-hosted tools, ensuring data never has to leave your site.

    Matomo is open-source, which is also rare in this class of tools. That means it’s available for anyone to adapt and customise as they wish. Everything you need to build custom APIs is there.

    Image showing the origin of website traffic.
    The Locations page in Matomo shows the countries, continents, regions, and cities where website traffic originates.

    Its most useful capabilities include visitor logs and session recordings to trace the entire customer journey, spot drop-off points, and fine-tune sales funnels. The platform also comes with heatmaps and A/B testing tools. Heatmaps provide a useful visual representation of your data, while A/B testing allows for more informed, data-driven decisions.

    Despite its range of features, many reviewers laud Matomo’s user interface for its simplicity and user-friendliness. 

    Why Matomo : Matomo is an excellent alternative because it fills in the gaps where Amplitude comes up short, like with cookieless tracking. Also, while Amplitude focuses mainly on behavioural analytics, Matomo offers both behavioural and traditional analytics, which allows more profound insight into your data. Furthermore, Matomo fully complies with the strictest privacy regulations worldwide, including GDPR, LGPD, and HIPAA.

    Standout features include multi-touch attribution, visits log, content engagement, ecommerce, customer segments, event tracking, goal tracking, custom dimensions, custom reports, automated email reports, tag manager, sessions recordings, roll-up reporting that can pull data from multiple websites or mobile apps, Google Analytics importer, Matomo tag manager, comprehensive visitor tracking, heatmaps, and more.

    Integrations with 100+ technologies, including Cloudflare, WordPress, Magento, Google Ads, Drupal, WooCommerce, Vue, SharePoint and Wix.

    Pricing is free for Matomo On-Premise and $23 per month for Matomo Cloud, which comes with a 21-day free trial (no credit card required).

    Strengths

    • Privacy focused
    • Cookieless consent banners
    • 100% accurate, unsampled data
    • Open-source code 
    • Complete data ownership (no sharing with third parties)
    • Self-hosting and cloud-based options
    • Built-in GDPR Manager
    • Custom alerts, white labelling, dashboards and reports

    Community critiques 

    • Premium features are expensive and proprietary
    • Learning curve for non-technical users

    2. Mixpanel – Best for product analytics

    Mixpanel is a dedicated product analytics tool. It tracks and analyses customer interactions with a product across different platforms and helps optimise digital products to improve the user experience. It works with real-time data and can provide answers from customer and revenue data in seconds.

    It also presents data visualisations to show how customers interact with products.

    Screenshot reflecting useful customer trends

    Mixpanel allows you to play around filters and views to reveal and chart some useful customer trends. (Image source)

    Why Mixpanel : One of the strengths of this platform is the ability to test hypotheses. Need to test an ambitious idea ? Mixpanel data can do it with real user analytics. That allows you to make data-driven decisions to find the best path forward.

    Standout features include automatic funnel segment analysis, behavioural segmentation, cohort segmentation, collaboration support, customisable dashboards, data pipelines, filtered data views, SQL queries, warehouse connectors and a wide range of pre-built integrations.

    Integrations available include Appcues, AppsFlyer, AWS, Databox, Figma, Google Cloud, Hotjar, HubSpot, Intercom, Integromat, MailChimp, Microsoft Azure, Segment, Slack, Statsig, VWO, Userpilot, WebEngage, Zapier, ZOH) and dozens of others.

    Pricing starts with a freemium plan valid for up to 20 million events per month. The growth plan is affordable at $25 per month and adds features like no-code data transformations and data pipeline add-ons. The enterprise version runs at a monthly cost of $833 and provides the full suite of features and services and premium support.

    There’s a caveat. Those prices only allow up to 1,000 Monthly Tracked Users (MTUs), calculated based on the number of visitors that perform a qualifying event each month. Beyond that, MTU plans start at $20,000 per year.

    Strengths

    • User behaviour and interaction tracking
    • Unlimited cohort segmentation capabilities
    • Drop-off analysis showing where users get stuck
    • A/B testing capabilities

    Community critiques 

    • Expensive enterprise features
    • Extensive setup and configuration requirements

    3. Google Analytics 4 – Best free web analytics tool

    The first thing to know about Google Analytics 4 is that it’s a web analytics tool. In other words, it tracks sessions, not user behaviours in app environments. It can provide details on how people found your website and how they go there, but it doesn’t offer much detail on how people use your product. 

    There is also an enterprise version, Google Analytics 360, which is not free. We’ve broken down the differences between the two versions elsewhere.

    Image showing audience-related data provided by GA4

    GA4’s audience overview shows visitors, sessions, session lengths, bounce rates, and user engagement data. (Image source)

     

    Why Google Analytics : It’s great for gauging the effectiveness of marketing campaigns, tracking goal completions (purchases, cart additions, etc.) and spotting trends and patterns in user engagement.

    Standout features include built-in automation, customisable conversion goals, data drill-down functionality, detailed web acquisition metrics, media spend ROI calculations and out-of-the-box web analytics reporting.

    Integrations include all major CRM platforms, CallRail, DoubleClick DCM, Facebook, Hootsuite, Marketo, Shopify, VWO, WordPress, Zapier and Zendesk, among many others.

    Pricing is free for the basic version (Google Analytics 4) and scales based on features and data volume. The advanced features (in Google Analytics 360) are pitched at enterprises, and pricing is custom.

    Strengths

    • Free to start
    • Multiple website management
    • Traffic source details
    • Up-to-date traffic data

    Community critiques 

    • Steep learning curve 
    • Data sampling

    4. Adobe Analytics – Best for predictive analytics

    A fully configured Adobe Analytics implementation is the Swiss army knife of analytics tools. It begins with web analytics, adds product analytics, and then wraps it up nicely with predictive analytics.

    Unlike all the Amplitude alternatives here, there’s no free version. Adobe Analytics has a complicated pricing matrix with options like website analytics, marketing analytics, attribution, and predictive analytics. It also has a wide range of customisation options that will appeal to large businesses. But for smaller organisations, it may all be a bit too much.

    Mixpanel allows you to play around filters and views to reveal and chart some useful customer trends. (Image source)

    Screenshot categorising online orders by marketing channel

    Adobe Analytics’ cross-channel attribution ties actions from different channels into a single customer journey. (Image source)

     

    Why Adobe Analytics : For current Adobe customers, this is a logical next step. Either way, Adobe Analytics can combine, evaluate, and analyse data from any part of the customer journey. It analyses that data with predictive intelligence to provide insights to enhance customer experiences.

     

    Standout features include AI-powered prediction analysis, attribution analysis, multi-channel data collection, segmentation and detailed customer journey analytics, product analytics and web analytics.

     

    Integrations are available through the Adobe Experience Cloud Exchange. Adobe Analytics also supports data exchange with brands such as BrightEdge, Branch.io, Google Ads, Hootsuite, Invoca, Salesforce and over 200 other integrations.

     

    Pricing starts at $500 monthly, but prospective customers are encouraged to contact the company for a needs-based quotation.

     

    Strengths

    • Drag-and-drop interface
    • Flexible segmentation 
    • Easy-to-create conversion funnels
    • Threshold-based alerts and notifications

    Community critiques 

    • No free version
    • Lack of technical support
    • Steep learning curve

    5. Umami – Best lightweight tool for web analytics

    The second of our open-source analytics solutions is Umami, a favourite in the software development community. Like Matomo, it’s a powerful and privacy-focused alternative that offers complete data control and respects user privacy. It’s also available as a cloud-based freemium plan or as a self-hosted solution.

     

    Image showing current user traffic and hourly traffic going back 24 hours

    Umami’s dashboard reveals the busiest times of day and which pages are visited when.(Image source)

     

    Why Umami : Unami has a clear and simple user interface (UI) that lets you measure important metrics such as page visits, referrers, and user agents. It also features event tracking, although some reviewers complain that it’s quite limited.

    Standout features can be summed up in five words : privacy, simplicity, lightweight, real-time, and open-source. Unami’s UI is clean, intuitive and modern, and it doesn’t slow down your website. 

    Integrations include plugins for VuePress, Gatsby, Craft CMS, Docusaurus, WordPress and Publii, and a module for Nuxt. Unami’s API communicates with Javascript, PHP Laravel and Python.

    Pricing is free for up to 100k monthly events and three websites, but with limited support and data retention restrictions. The Pro plan costs $20 a month and gives you unlimited websites and team members, a million events (plus $0.00002 for each event over that), five years of data and email support. Their Enterprise plan is priced custom.

    Strengths

    • Freemium plan
    • Open-source
    • Lightweight 

    Community critiques 

    • Limited support options
    • Data retention restrictions
    • No funnel functionality

    6. Heap – Best for automatic data capture

    Product analytics with a twist is a good description of Heap. It features event auto-capture to track user interactions across all touchpoints in the user journey. This lets you fully understand how and why customers engage with your product and website. 

    Using a single Javascript snippet, Heap automatically collects data on everything users do, including how they got to your website. It also helps identify how different cohorts engage with your product, providing the critical insights teams need to boost conversion rates.

    Image showing funnel and path analysis data and insights

    Heap’s journeys feature combines funnel and path analysis. (Image source)

     

    Why Heap : The auto-capture functionality solves a major shortcoming of many product analytics tools — manual tracking. Instead of having to set up manual tags on events, Heap automatically captures all data on user activity from the start. 

    Standout features include event auto-capture, session replay, heatmaps, segments (or cohorts) and journeys, the last of which combines the functions of funnel and path analysis tools into a single feature.

    Integrations include AWS, Google, Microsoft Azure, major CRM platforms, Snowflake and many other data manipulation platforms.

    Pricing is quote-based across all payment tiers. There is also a free plan and a 14-day free trial.

    Strengths

    • Session replay
    • Heatmaps 
    • User segmentation
    • Simple setup 
    • Event auto-capture 

    Community critiques 

    • No A/B testing functionality
    • No GDPR compliance support

    Choosing the best solution for your team

    When selecting a tool, it’s crucial to understand how product analytics and web analytics solutions differ. 

    Product analytics tools track users or accounts and record the features they use, the funnels they move through, and the cohorts they’re part of. Web analytics tools focus more on sessions than users because they’re interested in data that can help improve website usage. 

    Some tools combine product and web analytics to do both of these jobs.

    Area of focus

    Product analytics tools track user behaviour within SaaS- or app-based products. They’re helpful for analysing features, user journeys, engagement metrics, product development and iteration. 

    Web analytics tools analyse web traffic, user demographics, and traffic sources. They’re most often used for marketing and SEO insights.

    Level of detail

    Product analytics tools provide in-depth tracking and analysis of user interactions, feature usage, and cohort analysis.

    Web analytics tools provide broader data on page views, bounce rates, and conversion tracking to analyse overall site performance.

    Whatever tools you try, your first step should be to search for reviews online to see what people who’ve used them think about them. There are some great review sites you can try. See what people are saying on Capterra, G2, Gartner Peer Insights, or TrustRadius

    Use Matomo to power your web and app analytics

    Web and product analytics is a competitive field, and there are many other tools worth considering. This list is a small cross-section of what’s available.

    That said, if you have concerns about privacy and costs, consider choosing Matomo. Start your 21-day free trial today.

  • FFMPEG stereo track stops capturing at random times during a capture session

    26 mai 2022, par mrwassen

    I am currently working on building a workflow to capture and archive a large stash of family and friends PAL and NTSC VHS tapes. The hardware setup is as follows :

    


      

    • JVC HR-7860S VCR
    • 


    • s-video / RCA audio >
    • 


    • ADVC-3000 converter
    • 


    • SDI / BNC cable >
    • 


    • Blackmagic Decklink Mini Recorder 4K PCIe card
    • 


    • installed in a fairly hi-spec windows machine : AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 3.7 Ghz base 12 core, GEFORCE RTX 3060 12 gB, 32 gB ram
    • 


    


    The plan is to capture to lossless AVI, then drop into an NLE (Vegas Pro v.16) to do a minimal amount of cleanup / trimming, then render to a more compressed video format (TBD) for upload to AWS S3 accessible through a family website.

    


    The issue I am having is that when I run the capture using ffmpeg/directshow e.g. for a perfectly fine 90 min. PAL tape, at some random point of time during the capture one of the 2 stereo channels just stops capturing. This has happened with all of the tapes I have tested so far, and it happens at different times during the same video. I have examined the frames surrounding points in time when this happens, and it doesn't correlate to any transitions or jitter, but often just randomly in the middle of a perfectly smooth scene. Once the one channel stops capturing it never starts back up again during that capture session.

    


    The ADVC-3000 and the VCR are both showing both stereo channels playing normally throughout the capture. The windows machine running the capture hardly breaks a sweat at any time, and the transfer easily keeps up constantly showing a speed = 1x which I assume means nothing lagging. Also there are no video/audio sync issues at any point in time even towards the end of long tapes e.g. 90 mins.

    


    I am fairly new at ffmpeg, so I have spent extensive amounts of time reading up on forum posts and experimenting and have ended up with the following syntax :

    


    ffmpeg -y -f dshow -rtbufsize 2000M -i video="Blackmagic WDM Capture":audio="Blackmagic WDM Capture" -codec:v v210 -pix_fmt yuv422p -codec:a pcm_s16le -b:a 128k -t 02:00:00 -r 25 -threads 4 -maxrate 2500k -filter:a "volume=1.5" output_v210_audio.avi


    


    The capture runs without a single dropped frame, the only error I am getting when launching (and perhaps this is a smoking gun ?) is :

    


    


    "Non-monotonous DTS in output stream 0:1 ; previous : 0, current : -30 ;
changing to 1. This may result in incorrect timestamps in the output
file."

    


    


    I have tried to troubleshoot this in the hopes that it is tied to my issue but so far without luck.

    


    Hoping somebody can help correct or modify my command line or perhaps other ideas to help resolve the issue.

    


  • ValueError : I/O operation on closed file with ffmpeg

    22 mars 2018, par AstroCoda

    I’m trying to get this (minimal working example) code to compile in a virtual environment on Anaconda which I’ve set up in a supercomputing cluster :

    import numpy as np
    import matplotlib
    matplotlib.use("Agg")
    import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
    import matplotlib.animation as manimation

    FFMpegWriter = manimation.writers['ffmpeg']
    metadata = dict(title='Movie Test', artist='Matplotlib',
               comment='Movie support!')
    writer = FFMpegWriter(fps=15, metadata=metadata)

    fig = plt.figure()
    l, = plt.plot([], [], 'k-o')

    plt.xlim(-5, 5)
    plt.ylim(-5, 5)

    x0, y0 = 0, 0

    with writer.saving(fig, "writer_test.mp4", 100):
       for i in range(100):
           x0 += 0.1 * np.random.randn()
           y0 += 0.1 * np.random.randn()
           l.set_data(x0, y0)
           writer.grab_frame()

    The thing is, this code works absolutely fine on my local machine (MacOSX) - Anaconda distribution ; Python 2.7 ; same matplotlib and numpy version, and I have ffmpeg on Anaconda ; I have ffmpeg on the cluster as well, albeit at a different version to the one on Python (but no issue with this on my local machine). When I run the code on the cluster, I get :

    Traceback (most recent call last):
     File "movie_test.py", line 25, in <module>
       writer.grab_frame()
     File "~/anaconda2/envs/test_movie/lib/python2.7/contextlib.py", line 35, in __exit__
       self.gen.throw(type, value, traceback)
     File "~/anaconda2/envs/test_movie/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/animation.py", line 241, in saving
       self.finish()
     File "~/anaconda2/envs/test_movie/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/animation.py", line 367, in finish
       self.cleanup()
     File "~/anaconda2/envs/test_movie/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/animation.py", line 405, in cleanup
       out, err = self._proc.communicate()
     File "~/anaconda2/envs/test_movie/lib/python2.7/site-packages/subprocess32.py", line 927, in communicate
       stdout, stderr = self._communicate(input, endtime, timeout)
     File "~/anaconda2/envs/test_movie/lib/python2.7/site-packages/subprocess32.py", line 1713, in _communicate
       orig_timeout)
     File "~/anaconda2/envs/test_movie/lib/python2.7/site-packages/subprocess32.py", line 1769, in _communicate_with_poll
       register_and_append(self.stdout, select_POLLIN_POLLPRI)
     File "~/anaconda2/envs/test_movie/lib/python2.7/site-packages/subprocess32.py", line 1748, in register_and_append
       poller.register(file_obj.fileno(), eventmask)
    ValueError: I/O operation on closed file
    </module>

    All the searches I’ve made correspond to relatively simple text write in/out operations, but not for videos. Thanks in advance for the help !