Recherche avancée

Médias (1)

Mot : - Tags -/lev manovitch

Autres articles (47)

  • Des sites réalisés avec MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    Cette page présente quelques-uns des sites fonctionnant sous MediaSPIP.
    Vous pouvez bien entendu ajouter le votre grâce au formulaire en bas de page.

  • Support audio et vidéo HTML5

    10 avril 2011

    MediaSPIP utilise les balises HTML5 video et audio pour la lecture de documents multimedia en profitant des dernières innovations du W3C supportées par les navigateurs modernes.
    Pour les navigateurs plus anciens, le lecteur flash Flowplayer est utilisé.
    Le lecteur HTML5 utilisé a été spécifiquement créé pour MediaSPIP : il est complètement modifiable graphiquement pour correspondre à un thème choisi.
    Ces technologies permettent de distribuer vidéo et son à la fois sur des ordinateurs conventionnels (...)

  • HTML5 audio and video support

    13 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
    The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
    For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
    MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...)

Sur d’autres sites (4684)

  • ffmpeg x11grab Fedora 22 cannot open display [on hold]

    4 août 2015, par voor

    Running a fairly recent version of Fedora 22 :

    Linux localhost 4.1.3-200.fc22.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jul 22 19:51:58 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

    Dual screen Acer XB270HU and AOC 2369. Also uses NVIDIA Drivers :

    ➜  ~  rpm -qa | grep nvidia
    nvidia-driver-libs-352.30-1.fc22.x86_64
    nvidia-driver-352.30-1.fc22.x86_64
    nvidia-settings-352.30-1.fc22.x86_64
    nvidia-libXNVCtrl-352.30-1.fc22.x86_64
    dkms-nvidia-352.30-1.fc22.x86_64
    nvidia-driver-libs-352.30-1.fc22.i686

    Whenever I attempt to do a x11grab in ffmpeg I get an error :

    ➜  ~  ffmpeg -f x11grab -r 15 -s 1920x1080 -i :0 -vcodec h264 -crf 30 -y output.mp4
    ffmpeg version 2.6.3 Copyright (c) 2000-2015 the FFmpeg developers
     built with gcc 5.1.1 (GCC) 20150422 (Red Hat 5.1.1-1)
     configuration: --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --datadir=/usr/share/ffmpeg --incdir=/usr/include/ffmpeg --libdir=/usr/lib64 --mandir=/usr/share/man --arch=x86_64 --optflags='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic' --enable-bzlib --disable-crystalhd --enable-frei0r --enable-gnutls --enable-ladspa --enable-libass --enable-libcdio --enable-libdc1394 --disable-indev=jack --enable-libfreetype --enable-libgsm --enable-libmp3lame --enable-openal --enable-libopencv --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopus --enable-libpulse --enable-libschroedinger --enable-libsoxr --enable-libspeex --enable-libtheora --enable-libvorbis --enable-libv4l2 --enable-libvpx --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 --enable-libxvid --enable-x11grab --enable-avfilter --enable-avresample --enable-postproc --enable-pthreads --disable-static --enable-shared --enable-gpl --disable-debug --disable-stripping --shlibdir=/usr/lib64 --enable-runtime-cpudetect
     libavutil      54. 20.100 / 54. 20.100
     libavcodec     56. 26.100 / 56. 26.100
     libavformat    56. 25.101 / 56. 25.101
     libavdevice    56.  4.100 / 56.  4.100
     libavfilter     5. 11.102 /  5. 11.102
     libavresample   2.  1.  0 /  2.  1.  0
     libswscale      3.  1.101 /  3.  1.101
     libswresample   1.  1.100 /  1.  1.100
     libpostproc    53.  3.100 / 53.  3.100
    Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key[x11grab @ 0x1fe1d40] Cannot open display :0, error 1.
    :0: Input/output error

    I’ve tried a few different commands basically copy/pasta from the web on how to do screengrabs. I don’t need audio, just video, and all of them result in the same error.

    I am able to do xwininfo without any problems :

    ➜  ~  xwininfo    

    xwininfo: Please select the window about which you
             would like information by clicking the
             mouse in that window.

    xwininfo: Window id: 0x1e0006c "linux - ffmpeg x11grab Fedora 22 cannot open display - Stack Overflow - Google Chrome"

     Absolute upper-left X:  0
     Absolute upper-left Y:  27
     Relative upper-left X:  0
     Relative upper-left Y:  27
     Width: 2560
     Height: 1413
     Depth: 24
     Visual: 0x21
     Visual Class: TrueColor
     Border width: 0
     Class: InputOutput
     Colormap: 0x20 (installed)
     Bit Gravity State: ForgetGravity
     Window Gravity State: NorthWestGravity
     Backing Store State: NotUseful
     Save Under State: no
     Map State: IsViewable
     Override Redirect State: no
     Corners:  +0+27  -1920+27  -1920-0  0
     -geometry 2560x14130
  • Compile FFmpeg with x264 for MacOS and Windows on Linux

    9 mars 2023, par RobinFrcd

    I successfully managed to compile a minimal standalone FFmpeg binary to create MP4 videos from JPG images encoded with x264. The binary is 100% functional and is 5.2MB.

    


    To do that, I used :

    


    ./configure \
--disable-everything \
--enable-decoder=mjpeg \
--enable-encoder=libx264 \
--enable-protocol=concat,file \
--enable-demuxer=image2 \
--enable-muxer=mp4 \
--enable-filter=scale \
--enable-gpl \
--enable-libx264 \
--extra-ldexeflags="-static" \
--pkg-config="pkg-config --static"


    


    I now would like to build the macOS and windows binaries directly from my Linux machine. I tried this repo and replaced the config args with mine, but the output exe is 30MB+. And I don't find anything about building for MacOS.

    


    Is there a solution to make this minimal build cross-platform compatible ?

    


  • Meta Receives a Record GDPR Fine from The Irish Data Protection Commission

    29 mai 2023, par Erin — GDPR

    The Irish Data Protection Commission (the DPC) issued a €1.2 billion fine to Meta on May, 22nd 2023 for violating the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 

    The regulator ruled that Meta was unlawfully transferring European users’ data to its US-based servers and taking no sufficient measures for ensuring users’ privacy. 

    Meta must now suspend data transfer within five months and delete EU/EEA users’ personal data that was illegally transferred across the border. Or they risk facing another round of repercussions. 

    Meta continued to transfer personal user data to the USA following an earlier ruling of The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which already address problematic EU-U.S. data flows. Meta continued those transfers on the basis of the updated Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”), adopted by the European Commission in 2021. 

    The Irish regulator successfully proved that these arrangements had not sufficiently addressed the “fundamental rights and freedoms” of the European data subjects, outlined in the CJEU ruling. Meta was not doing enough to protect EU users’ data against possible surveillance and unconsented usage by US authorities or other authorised entities.

    Why European Regulators Are After The US Big Tech Firms ? 

    GDPR regulations have been a sore area of compliance for US-based big tech companies. 

    Effectively, they had to adopt a host of new measures for collecting user consent, ensuring compliant data storage and the right to request data removal for a substantial part of their user bases. 

    The wrinkle, however, is that companies like Google and Meta among others, don’t have separate data processing infrastructure for different markets. Instead, all the user data gets commingled on the companies’ servers, which are located in the US. 

    Data storage facilities’ location is an issue. In 2020, the CJEU made a historical ruling, called the invalidation of the Privacy Shield. Originally, international companies were allowed to transfer data between the EU and the US if they adhered to seven data protection principles. This arrangement was called the Privacy Shield. 

    However, the continuous investigation found that the Privacy Shield scheme was not GDPR compliant and therefore companies could no longer use it to justify cross-border data transfers.

    The invalidation of the Privacy Shield gave ground for further investigations of the big tech companies’ compliance statuses. 

    In March 2022, the Irish DPC issued the first €17 million fine to Meta for “insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security of European users”. In September 2022, Meta was again hit with a €405 million fine for Instagram breaching GDPR principles. 

    2023 began with another series of rulings, with the DPC concluding that Meta had breaches of the GDPR relating to its Facebook service (€210 million fine) and breaches related to Instagram (€180 million fine). 

    Clearly, Meta already knew they weren’t doing enough for GDPR compliance and yet they refused to take privacy-focused action

    Is Google GDPR Compliant ?

    Google has a similar “track record” as Meta when it comes to ensuring full compliance with the GDPR. Although Google has said to provide users with more controls for managing their data privacy, the proposed solutions are just scratching the surface. 

    In the background, Google continues to leverage its ample reserves of user browsing, behavioural and device data in product development and advertising. 

    In 2022, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) found that Google used web users’ information in its real-time bidding ad system without their knowledge or consent. The French data regulator (CNIL), in turn, fined Google for €150 million because of poor cookie consent banners the same year. 

    Google Analytics GDPR compliance status is, however, the bigger concern.

    Neither Google Univeral Analytics (UA) nor Google Analytics 4 are GDPR compliant, following the Privacy Shield framework invalidation in 2020. 

    Fines from individual regulators in Sweden, France, Austria, Italy, Denmark, Finland and Norway ruled that Google Analytics is non-GDPR compliant and is therefore illegal to use. 

    The regulatory rulings not just affect Google, but also GA users. Because the product is in breach of European privacy laws, people using it are complacent. Privacy groups like noyb, for example, are exercising their right to sue individual websites, using Google Analytics.

    How to Stay GDPR Compliant With Website Analytics 

    To avoid any potential risk exposure, selectively investigate each website analytics provider’s data storage and management practices. 

    Inquire about the company’s data storage locations among the first things. For example, Matomo Cloud keeps all the data in the EU, while Matomo On-Premise edition gives you the option to store data in any country of your choice. 

    Secondly, ask about their process for consent tracking and subsequent data analysis. Our website analytics product is fully GDPR compliant as we have first-party cookies enabled by default, offer a convenient option of tracking out-outs, provide a data removal mechanism and practice safe data storage. In fact, Matomo was approved by the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) as one of the few web analytics apps that can be used to collect data without tracking consent

    Using an in-built GDPR Manager, Matomo users can implement the right set of controls for their market and their industry. For example, you can implement extra data or IP anonymization ; disable visitor logs and profiles. 

    Thanks to our privacy-by-design architecture and native controls, users can make their Matomo analytics compliant even with the strictest privacy laws like HIPAA, CCPA, LGPD and PECR. 

    Learn more about GDPR-friendly website analytics.

    Final Thoughts

    Since the GDPR came into effect in 2018, over 1,400 fines have been given to various companies in breach of the regulations. Meta and Google have been initially lax in response to European regulatory demands. But as new fines follow and the consumer pressure mounts, Big Tech companies are forced to take more proactive measures : add opt-outs for personalised ads and introduce an alternative mechanism to third-party cookies

    Companies, using non-GDPR-compliant tools risk finding themselves in the crossfire of consumer angst and regulatory criticism. To operate an ethical, compliant business consider privacy-focused alternatives to Google products, especially in the area of website analytics.