
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (22)
-
Other interesting software
13 avril 2011, parWe don’t claim to be the only ones doing what we do ... and especially not to assert claims to be the best either ... What we do, we just try to do it well and getting better ...
The following list represents softwares that tend to be more or less as MediaSPIP or that MediaSPIP tries more or less to do the same, whatever ...
We don’t know them, we didn’t try them, but you can take a peek.
Videopress
Website : http://videopress.com/
License : GNU/GPL v2
Source code : (...) -
Pas question de marché, de cloud etc...
10 avril 2011Le vocabulaire utilisé sur ce site essaie d’éviter toute référence à la mode qui fleurit allègrement
sur le web 2.0 et dans les entreprises qui en vivent.
Vous êtes donc invité à bannir l’utilisation des termes "Brand", "Cloud", "Marché" etc...
Notre motivation est avant tout de créer un outil simple, accessible à pour tout le monde, favorisant
le partage de créations sur Internet et permettant aux auteurs de garder une autonomie optimale.
Aucun "contrat Gold ou Premium" n’est donc prévu, aucun (...) -
Le plugin : Podcasts.
14 juillet 2010, parLe problème du podcasting est à nouveau un problème révélateur de la normalisation des transports de données sur Internet.
Deux formats intéressants existent : Celui développé par Apple, très axé sur l’utilisation d’iTunes dont la SPEC est ici ; Le format "Media RSS Module" qui est plus "libre" notamment soutenu par Yahoo et le logiciel Miro ;
Types de fichiers supportés dans les flux
Le format d’Apple n’autorise que les formats suivants dans ses flux : .mp3 audio/mpeg .m4a audio/x-m4a .mp4 (...)
Sur d’autres sites (3938)
-
Video Conferencing in HTML5 : WebRTC via Web Sockets
14 juin 2012, par silviaA bit over a week ago I gave a presentation at Web Directions Code 2012 in Melbourne. Maxine and John asked me to speak about something related to HTML5 video, so I went for the new shiny : WebRTC – real-time communication in the browser.
I only had 20 min, so I had to make it tight. I wanted to show off video conferencing without special plugins in Google Chrome in just a few lines of code, as is the promise of WebRTC. To a large extent, I achieved this. But I made some interesting discoveries along the way. Demos are in the slide deck.
UPDATE : Opera 12 has been released with WebRTC support.
Housekeeping : if you want to replicate what I have done, you need to install a Google Chrome Web Browser 19+. Then make sure you go to chrome ://flags and activate the MediaStream and PeerConnection experiment(s). Restart your browser and now you can experiment with this feature. Big warning up-front : it’s not production-ready, since there are still changes happening to the spec and there is no compatible implementation by another browser yet.
Here is a brief summary of the steps involved to set up video conferencing in your browser :
- Set up a video element each for the local and the remote video stream.
- Grab the local camera and stream it to the first video element.
- (*) Establish a connection to another person running the same Web page.
- Send the local camera stream on that peer connection.
- Accept the remote camera stream into the second video element.
Now, the most difficult part of all of this – believe it or not – is the signalling part that is required to build the peer connection (marked with (*)). Initially I wanted to run completely without a server and just enter the remote’s IP address to establish the connection. This is, however, not a functionality that the PeerConnection object provides [might this be something to add to the spec ?].
So, you need a server known to both parties that can provide for the handshake to set up the connection. All the examples that I have seen, such as https://apprtc.appspot.com/, use a channel management server on Google’s appengine. I wanted it all working with HTML5 technology, so I decided to use a Web Socket server instead.
I implemented my Web Socket server using node.js (code of websocket server). The video conferencing demo is in the slide deck in an iframe – you can also use the stand-alone html page. Works like a treat.
While it is still using Google’s STUN server to get through NAT, the messaging for setting up the connection is running completely through the Web Socket server. The messages that get exchanged are plain SDP message packets with a session ID. There are OFFER, ANSWER, and OK packets exchanged for each streaming direction. You can see some of it in the below image :
I’m not running a public WebSocket server, so you won’t be able to see this part of the presentation working. But the local loopback video should work.
At the conference, it all went without a hitch (while the wireless played along). I believe you have to host the WebSocket server on the same machine as the Web page, otherwise it won’t work for security reasons.
A whole new world of opportunities lies out there when we get the ability to set up video conferencing on every Web page – scary and exciting at the same time !
-
How do I use ffmpeg with live streaming from an IP camera [closed]
28 février 2013, par Murali HariharanMy question is very basic because I am a newbie to all these
technologies.I have an IP camera connected to my internal network.
http://192.168.1.20/videostream.cgi?user=admin&pwd=
...gives a live streaming view in Firefox or Internet Explorer.
Now I want to record the live stream into a video.
The parameters to be supplied are
begin_time
,end_time
,format
of video etc.How do I accomplish this ?
I appreciate any guidance.
-
Can't find preset files
1er juin 2012, par Bilthonthis is a ffmpeg issue. I've got this error saying it could not find the hq preset file, then I read in the documentation that it looks for the preset files at 'PREFIX/share/ffmpeg' and also at '$HOME/.ffmpeg'. The thing is I'm calling ffmpeg from whithin a php file that calls a python script that finally executes the command something like 'commands.getstatusoutput(command)' so I was not sure who the user was.
The solution ? I just used -fpre and my call now looks like this :
/usr/local/bin/ffmpeg -i ../files/tmpvideos/myStream.flv -y -acodec libfaac -ab 96k -b 800k -maxrate 800k -minrate 600k -bufsize 800k -s 720x640 -vcodec libx264 -g 300 -r 20 -fpre /home/admin/.ffmpeg/libx264-hq.ffpreset -threads 0 ../files/tmpvideos/4647-60.mp4
I created that directory under /home/admin and am 100% sure that there the file is there now, but still ffmpeg says :
File for preset '/home/admin/.ffmpeg/libx264-hq.ffpreset' not found
So I'm not sure why is it not working since I'm specifying the complete path now. Any ideas ?
One reason that I'm thinking of, is that it maybe was not compiled correctly, like with all the flags and stuff. What I mean is that while some outputs out there looked like this :
FFmpeg version SVN-r22976, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg developers
built on Apr 30 2010 12:03:12 with gcc 4.2.1-sjlj (mingw32-2)
configuration: --enable-shared --enable-static --enable-memalign-hack
--enable
-libmp3lame --enable-libx264 --enable-gpl
libavutil 50.14. 0 / 50.14. 0
libavcodec 52.66. 0 / 52.66. 0
libavformat 52.61. 0 / 52.61. 0
libavdevice 52. 2. 0 / 52. 2. 0
libswscale 0.10. 0 / 0.10. 0mine looks more like this :
Output: FFmpeg version 0.6.1, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg developers
built on Nov 12 2010 16:32:38 with gcc 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)
configuration:
libavutil 50.15. 1 / 50.15. 1
libavcodec 52.72. 2 / 52.72. 2
libavformat 52.64. 2 / 52.64. 2
libavdevice 52. 2. 0 / 52. 2. 0
libswscale 0.11. 0 / 0.11. 0No configuration stuff. What do u think ? could be that this ffmpeg was not compiled correctly so it will never find the presets ? I didn't compile it, so can't be sure.
Thanks and sorry for the verbosity of the question.
Nelson