
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Revolution of Open-source and film making towards open film making
6 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Juillet 2013
Langue : English
Type : Texte
Autres articles (89)
-
Participer à sa traduction
10 avril 2011Vous pouvez nous aider à améliorer les locutions utilisées dans le logiciel ou à traduire celui-ci dans n’importe qu’elle nouvelle langue permettant sa diffusion à de nouvelles communautés linguistiques.
Pour ce faire, on utilise l’interface de traduction de SPIP où l’ensemble des modules de langue de MediaSPIP sont à disposition. ll vous suffit de vous inscrire sur la liste de discussion des traducteurs pour demander plus d’informations.
Actuellement MediaSPIP n’est disponible qu’en français et (...) -
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir -
HTML5 audio and video support
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...)
Sur d’autres sites (9909)
-
Does ffmpeg rtp_mpegts muxer support setting DVB triplet ?
19 février 2021, par drake7It seems ffmpeg lets you set the DVB triplet with UDP but not with RTP.


FYI : This is a followup on my findings about the
rtp_mpegts
muxer compared to thempegts
muxer : Question

In my tests I was using
ffmpeg version 4.3.1-2021-01-01-full_build-www.gyan.dev
on windows.

findings


I analyzed my streams with
dectec
's "StreamXpert" :

- 

-
With UDP and it's
mpegts
muxer, the DVB triplet can be set (1)

-
With RTP and it's
rtp_mpegts
muxer, the DVB triplet is ignored (3) (Note that 3a and 3b create very similar results in "StreamXpert".)

-
Using UDP with DVB triplet as input and output with RTP ignores the DVB triplet (2)











Interestingly, leaving out the following options...


-pcr_period 20 -pat_period 0.10 -sdt_period 0.25 -metadata:s:a:0 language=nya \
-mpegts_flags +pat_pmt_at_frames -mpegts_flags system_b



... the
rtp_mpegts
muxer (3b) creates a valid DVB transport stream, while the thempegts
muxer (4) does not.

ffmpeg params :


- 




muxer :
mpegts
(udp)

ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -r 25 -c:v libx264 -pix_fmt yuv420p -profile:v main -level 3.1 -preset veryfast -vf scale=1280:720,setdar=dar=16/9 -an -bsf:v h264_mp4toannexb -b:v 4M -muxrate 8M \
-pcr_period 20 -pat_period 0.10 -sdt_period 0.25 -metadata:s:a:0 language=nya -mpegts_flags +pat_pmt_at_frames \
-mpegts_transport_stream_id 0x005A \
-mpegts_original_network_id 0x005B \
-mpegts_service_id 0x005C \
-mpegts_pmt_start_pid 0x005D -mpegts_start_pid 0x005E -mpegts_service_type advanced_codec_digital_hdtv \
-metadata service_provider="Provider foo" \
-metadata service_name="Service bar" \
-mpegts_flags system_b -flush_packets 0 \
-f mpegts "udp://239.10.33.10:1234?pkt_size=1316"



- 




muxer :
rtp_mpegts
(rtp)

ffmpeg -i "udp://239.10.33.10:1234" -map 0 -c copy \
-f rtp_mpegts "rtp://239.10.33.11:1234?pkt_size=1316"



- 




a) muxer :
rtp_mpegts
(rtp)

ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -r 25 -c:v libx264 -pix_fmt yuv420p -profile:v main -level 3.1 -preset veryfast -vf scale=1280:720,setdar=dar=16/9 -an -bsf:v h264_mp4toannexb -b:v 4M -muxrate 8M \
-pcr_period 20 -pat_period 0.10 -sdt_period 0.25 -metadata:s:a:0 language=nya -mpegts_flags +pat_pmt_at_frames \
-mpegts_transport_stream_id 0x005A \
-mpegts_original_network_id 0x005B \
-mpegts_service_id 0x005C \
-mpegts_pmt_start_pid 0x005D -mpegts_start_pid 0x005E -mpegts_service_type advanced_codec_digital_hdtv \
-metadata service_provider="Provider foo" \
-metadata service_name="Service bar" \
-mpegts_flags system_b -flush_packets 0 \
-f rtp_mpegts "rtp://239.10.33.10:1234?pkt_size=1316"



b) muxer :
rtp_mpegts
(rtp) (omitting some options)

ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -r 25 -c:v libx264 -vf scale=1280:720,setdar=dar=16/9 -b:v 4M -muxrate 8M \
-mpegts_transport_stream_id 0x005A \
-mpegts_original_network_id 0x005B \
-mpegts_service_id 0x005C -mpegts_pmt_start_pid 0x005D -mpegts_start_pid 0x005E \
-mpegts_service_type advanced_codec_digital_hdtv \
-metadata service_provider="Provider foo" \
-metadata service_name="Service bar" \
-f rtp_mpegts "rtp://239.10.33.10:1234"



- 




muxer :
mpegts
(udp) (omitting some options)

ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -r 25 -c:v libx264 -vf scale=1280:720,setdar=dar=16/9 -b:v 4M -muxrate 8M \
-mpegts_transport_stream_id 0x005A \
-mpegts_original_network_id 0x005B \
-mpegts_service_id 0x005C -mpegts_pmt_start_pid 0x005D -mpegts_start_pid 0x005E \
-mpegts_service_type advanced_codec_digital_hdtv \
-metadata service_provider="Provider foo" \
-metadata service_name="Service bar" \
-f mpegts "udp://239.10.33.10:1234"



Analyzing the transport stream




-
-
passing additional values to s3 event notification for lambda consumption
8 septembre 2017, par user1790300I have to write code in react-native that allows a user to upload videos to amazon s3 to be transcoded for consumption by various devices. For the processing after the upload occurs ; I am reviewing two approaches :
1) I can use Lambda with ffmpeg to handle the transcoding immediately after the uploading occurs (my fear here would be the amount of time required to transcode the videos and the effect on pricing if it takes a considerable amount of time).
2) I can have s3 pass an sns message to a rest api after the created event occurs and the rest api generate a rabbitmq message that will be processed by worker that will perform the transcoding using ffmpeg.
Option 1) seems to be the preferable option based on a completion time perspective. How concerned should I be with using 1) considering how long video transcoding might take as opposed to option 2) ?
Also, regardless, I need a way to pass additional parameters to lambda or along the sns messaging that would allow me to somehow associate the user who uploaded the video with their account. Is there a way to pass additional text-based values to s3 to pass along to lambda or along sns when the upload completes, as a caveat I plan to upload the video directly to s3 using the rest layer(found this answer here : http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/RESTObjectPUT.html#RESTObjectPUT-responses-examples) ?
-
Restream IP camera Feed [closed]
4 janvier 2024, par Reenath Reddy ThummalaI possess several IP cameras linked to a shared network. Although I intend to leverage each camera stream across multiple microservices, the network faces challenges in managing the bandwidth load. Unfortunately, I lack control over the network and cannot augment its bandwidth. Despite attempting to create a restreaming service using GStreamer, Live555, FFMPEG, and OpenCV, stability remains an issue. Are there any paid services accessible that can accept the source feed as input and provide scalable restream feed URLs ?