Recherche avancée

Médias (1)

Mot : - Tags -/artwork

Autres articles (92)

  • List of compatible distributions

    26 avril 2011, par

    The table below is the list of Linux distributions compatible with the automated installation script of MediaSPIP. Distribution nameVersion nameVersion number Debian Squeeze 6.x.x Debian Weezy 7.x.x Debian Jessie 8.x.x Ubuntu The Precise Pangolin 12.04 LTS Ubuntu The Trusty Tahr 14.04
    If you want to help us improve this list, you can provide us access to a machine whose distribution is not mentioned above or send the necessary fixes to add (...)

  • Selection of projects using MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    The examples below are representative elements of MediaSPIP specific uses for specific projects.
    MediaSPIP farm @ Infini
    The non profit organizationInfini develops hospitality activities, internet access point, training, realizing innovative projects in the field of information and communication technologies and Communication, and hosting of websites. It plays a unique and prominent role in the Brest (France) area, at the national level, among the half-dozen such association. Its members (...)

  • Pas question de marché, de cloud etc...

    10 avril 2011

    Le vocabulaire utilisé sur ce site essaie d’éviter toute référence à la mode qui fleurit allègrement
    sur le web 2.0 et dans les entreprises qui en vivent.
    Vous êtes donc invité à bannir l’utilisation des termes "Brand", "Cloud", "Marché" etc...
    Notre motivation est avant tout de créer un outil simple, accessible à pour tout le monde, favorisant
    le partage de créations sur Internet et permettant aux auteurs de garder une autonomie optimale.
    Aucun "contrat Gold ou Premium" n’est donc prévu, aucun (...)

Sur d’autres sites (10584)

  • webRTC issue converting from webm+wav to mp4

    16 janvier 2015, par DevStarlight

    After I got my .webm video and my .wav audio I decided to join it into an .mp4 file container.

    I followed the library of muaz-khan ffmpeg-asm.js to do this conversion but when It finished, I got the blob which apparently was empty of video but after I downloaded I could reproduce it on my windows media player.

    This is the code I have created for this test : jsfiddle

    Checking some other sources, I found that there is another guy who reported the problem directly to muaz-khan 1 month ago webrtc-experiment.com (Last comment).

    I don’t think it’s a problem related to conversion, I rather think is much more a problem of codecs.

    How could I solve this problem (if it’s possible to solve it) in order to watch my videos ?

    Thanks in advice.

  • the problem using "yt-dlp —download-sections" [closed]

    15 avril 2024, par talent

    I tried to use "yt-dlp —download-sections" to download specific segment of YouTube video.

    


    But I have confronted some error.

    


    If I use the cammand as followed, it will be ok, and download the whole video successfully.

    


    yt-dlp -P [path] [URL]


    


    But, if I add the "—download-sections" to download specific segment, it seems something wrong.
the command is as followed.

    


    yt-dlp -P [path] --download-sections "*00:08:06-00:08:17" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Vkmb4cUuLs 


    


    the eccor message

    


    Plus, the operation system is Windows. And I have used vpn(proxy).

    


    ffmpeg configuration

    


    I'd be tremendously appreciated if anyone can give me the early response to solve it !!!

    


  • YouTube's HD Video Streaming Server Technology ?

    30 septembre 2013, par bgentry

    Lately I've been researching different methods for streaming MP4s to the browser. Flash Media Server is an obvious choice here (using Cloudfront), and most solutions I've seen use the RTMP protocol.

    However, I spent some time on YouTube with Firebug and Chrome debugger figuring out how their streaming worked and I discovered some interesting differences between some of their videos and quality rates.

    My two sample videos are A and B. A is available up to 480p and B is available up to 1080p. For both videos, all rates up to 480p are served in an FLV container with H.264 video and AAC audio, over HTTP. What's interesting here is that if you have not yet downloaded (cached) the entire video, and you try to skip forward to an uncached part of the video, a new request will be made with a 'begin' parameter equal to the target offset in milliseconds. Example from Video A at 480p :

    http://v11.lscache8.c.youtube.com/videoplayback?ip=0.0.0.0&sparams=id%2Cexpire%2Cip%2Cipbits%2Citag%2Calgorithm%2Cburst%2Cfactor%2Coc%3AU0dWTldQVF9FSkNNNl9PSlhJ&fexp=904806%2C902906%2C903711&algorithm=throttle-factor&itag=35&ipbits=0&burst=40&sver=3&expire=1279756800&key=yt1&signature=D2D704D63C242CF187CAA5B5D5BAFB8DFACAC5FF.39180C01559C976717B651A7EB1D0C6249231EB7&factor=1.25&id=8568eb3135971f6f&begin=111863

    Response Headers:
    Cache-Control:public,max-age=23472
    Connection:close
    Content-Length:14320637
    Content-Type:video/x-flv
    Date:Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:23:48 GMT
    Expires:Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:55:00 GMT
    Last-Modified:Wed, 19 May 2010 12:31:41 GMT
    Server:gvs 1.0
    X-Content-Type-Options:nosniff

    The file returned by this URL is a fully valid FLV containing only the portion of the video after the requested offset.

    I did the same kind of test on the higher resolution versions of Video B. At 720p and 1080p, YouTube will return a video in an MP4 container, also with H.264 video and AAC audio. What's impressive to me is that their server takes the same type of offset for an MP4 video (via the 'begin' parameter) and returns a valid, streamable MP4 (moov atom at the front of the file with correct offsets) that also only includes the requested portion of the video.

    So, how does YouTube do this ? How do they generate the FLV or MP4 container on the fly with the correct headers and only the desired segment of the requested video ? I know this can be accomplished using FFMPEG to seek to the desired start point and the qt-faststart script to reposition the moov atom to the front of the stream, but it seems like this would be too slow to handle on-demand for millions of YouTube viewers.

    Ideas ?

    Thanks in advance !

    Footnote : I am not allowed to include more than 1 link at this point, so here is Video A's URL : http:// www.youtube .com/watch ?v=hWjrMTWXH28 "Video available up to 480p"