
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Rennes Emotion Map 2010-11
19 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Juillet 2013
Langue : français
Type : Texte
Autres articles (50)
-
Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins
27 avril 2010, parMediaspip core
autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs -
Contribute to a better visual interface
13 avril 2011MediaSPIP is based on a system of themes and templates. Templates define the placement of information on the page, and can be adapted to a wide range of uses. Themes define the overall graphic appearance of the site.
Anyone can submit a new graphic theme or template and make it available to the MediaSPIP community. -
Librairies et binaires spécifiques au traitement vidéo et sonore
31 janvier 2010, parLes logiciels et librairies suivantes sont utilisées par SPIPmotion d’une manière ou d’une autre.
Binaires obligatoires FFMpeg : encodeur principal, permet de transcoder presque tous les types de fichiers vidéo et sonores dans les formats lisibles sur Internet. CF ce tutoriel pour son installation ; Oggz-tools : outils d’inspection de fichiers ogg ; Mediainfo : récupération d’informations depuis la plupart des formats vidéos et sonores ;
Binaires complémentaires et facultatifs flvtool2 : (...)
Sur d’autres sites (11363)
-
lavc/flacdsp : optimise RVV vector type for lpc16
14 mai 2024, par Rémi Denis-Courmontlavc/flacdsp : optimise RVV vector type for lpc16
This calculates the optimal vector type value at run-time based on the
hardware vector length and the FLAC LPC prediction order. In this
particular case, the additional computation is easily amortised over
the loop iterations :T-Head C908 :
C V before V after
1 48.0 214.7 95.2
2 64.7 214.2 94.7
3 79.7 213.5 94.5
4 96.2 196.5 94.2 #
5 111.0 195.7 118.5
6 127.0 211.2 102.0
7 143.7 194.2 101.5
8 175.7 193.2 101.2 #
9 176.2 224.2 126.0
10 191.5 192.0 125.5
11 224.5 191.2 124.7
12 223.0 190.2 124.2
13 239.2 189.5 123.7
14 253.7 188.7 139.5
15 286.2 188.0 122.7
16 284.0 187.0 122.5 #
17 300.2 186.5 186.5
18 314.0 185.5 185.7
19 329.7 184.7 185.0
20 343.0 184.2 184.2
21 358.7 199.2 183.7
22 371.7 182.7 182.7
23 387.5 181.7 182.0
24 400.7 181.0 181.2
25 431.5 180.2 196.5
26 443.7 195.5 196.0
27 459.0 178.7 196.2
28 470.7 177.7 194.2
29 470.0 177.0 193.5
30 481.2 176.2 176.5
31 496.2 175.5 175.7
32 507.2 174.7 191.0 ## Power of two boundary.
With 128-bit vectors, improvements are expected for the first two
test cases only. For the other two, there is overhead but below noise.
Improvements should be better observable with prediction order of 8
and less, or on hardware with larger vector sizes. -
Combine many videos in list using FFMPEG
2 septembre 2022, par anoor1234I have a bunch of videos that are MP4s with different FPS, resolution, aspect ratio, basically everything. I'm trying to see if its possible to use FFMPEG to combine them into a single 1080/720 video using a single command, or at least make them all similar format so that combining is easy. Speed and less CPU power would be preferred but I'm in no rush and


I found this command on another stack overflow question :


ffmpeg -i 1.mp4 -i 2.mp4 -i 3.mp4 -filter_complex \
"[0:v]scale=1280:720:force_original_aspect_ratio=decrease,pad=1280:720:-1:-1,setsar=1,fps=30,format=yuv420p[v0];
 [1:v]scale=1280:720:force_original_aspect_ratio=decrease,pad=1280:720:-1:-1,setsar=1,fps=30,format=yuv420p[v1];
 [2:v]scale=1280:720:force_original_aspect_ratio=decrease,pad=1280:720:-1:-1,setsar=1,fps=30,format=yuv420p[v2];
 [v0][0:a][v1][1:a][v2][2:a]concat=n=3:v=1:a=1[v][a]" \
-map "[v]" -map "[a]" -c:v libx264 -c:a aac -movflags +faststart output.mp4



The problem is that I have more that 3 videos to combine and I don't know how to work this command with more, I have an entire list of videos in a list.txt file structured as such :


file './videos/video1.mp4'
file './videos/video2.mp4'
file './videos/video3.mp4'



The code that somewhat worked for me was this


ffmpeg -safe 0 -f concat -i list.txt -c copy output.mp4



It combines the video well and fairly fast but I get weird glitches with the audio and the resolution is weird (I'm hoping for 1920x1080). I suspect this is due to the varying attributes of each video but I'm not sure. I'm familiar with Python but I have found no Python script that can do what I ask. If there any way to combine my list into one video (using FFMPEG or not) reliably ?


-
ffmpeg encoder streaming issues
8 août 2017, par bobsingh1I am trying to build ffmpeg encoder on linux. I started with a custom built server Dual 1366 2.6 Ghz Xeon CPUs (6 cores) with 16 GB RAM with Ubuntu 16.04 minimal install. Built ffmpeg with h264 and aac. I am taking live source OTA channels and encoding/streaming them with following parameters
-vcodec libx264 -preset superfast -crf 25 -x264opts keyint=60:min-keyint=60:scenecut=-1 -bufsize 7000k -b:v 6000k -maxrate 6300k -muxrate 6000k -s 1920x1080 -format yuv420p -g 60 -sn -c:a aac -b:a 384k -ar 44100
And I am able to successfully udp out using mpegts. My problem starts with 5th stream. The server can handle four streams and as soon as I introduce 5th stream I start seeing hiccups in output. Looking at my cpu usage using top I still see only 65% to 75% usage with occasional 80% hit. Memory usage is well within acceptable parameters. So I am wondering either top is not giving me accurate cpu usage or something is not right with ffmpeg. The server is isolated for udp in/out on a 1 Gbps network.
I decided to up the cpu power and installed two 3.5 Ghz CPUs (6 cores) thinking it was perhaps the cpu clock. To my surprise the results were no different. So now I am wondering is there some built in limit I am hitting when I process at 1080p. If I change the resolution to 720p it is able to process 8 streams but 720 is not acceptable.
My target is 10 1080p streams per server.
So my questions are
1. If I use a quad motherboard and up the cpu count to 4 (6 or 8 cores) will I get 10 1080p streams ? Is there any theoretical max I can go with ffmpeg per machine ?
2. Do cores matter more or does clock matter more ?
3. Any suggestions in improvement with my options. I have tried ultrafast preset but the output quality is unacceptable.Thanks in advance