Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (38)

  • Websites made ​​with MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    This page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.

  • Creating farms of unique websites

    13 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
    This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)

  • Other interesting software

    13 avril 2011, par

    We don’t claim to be the only ones doing what we do ... and especially not to assert claims to be the best either ... What we do, we just try to do it well and getting better ...
    The following list represents softwares that tend to be more or less as MediaSPIP or that MediaSPIP tries more or less to do the same, whatever ...
    We don’t know them, we didn’t try them, but you can take a peek.
    Videopress
    Website : http://videopress.com/
    License : GNU/GPL v2
    Source code : (...)

Sur d’autres sites (5743)

  • Processing .Raw images using ffmpeg or OpenCV

    23 février 2013, par Ahmed Kato

    After reading Wikipedia page of Raw image format which is the digital negative of any image.

    To be viewed or printed, the output from a camera's image sensor has
    to be processed, that is, converted to a photographic rendering of the
    scene, and then stored in a standard raster graphics format such as
    JPEG. This processing, whether done in-camera or later in a raw-file
    converter, involves a number of operations, typically including

    I have some .raw files grabbed from my Logitech c920 using v4l2 example but when I display the image it looks like this :
    raw frame file a raw image where in other frames I can see my shadow

    Does anyone knows how to process such files to see the complete frame ?

    Here is a link to the original .raw file

  • How to get time stamp of closet keyframe before a given timestamp with ffmpeg ?

    20 février 2013, par jAckOdE

    I want a ffmpeg seeking command that fast and accurate. I found this

    The solution is that we apply -ss for both input (fast seeking) and output (accurate seeking). The question is that if the input seeking is not accurate how can we be sure that the seeking position is accurate.

    For example : as the example used in the link, if we want to seek to 00:03:00, the command is something likes

    ffmpeg -ss 00:02:30 -i ... -ss 00:00:30
    As said, the first seeking will seek to somewhere else not 00:02:30, say 00:02:31. and after applying second seek, the final result would be 00:03:01- NOT what we want. Is that correct ?

    Where does fist seeking seek to ? Does it seek to k-frame that closet to 00:02:30 ?

    If so, here is my thought, correct me if i'm wrong : after first seeking, we get the timestamp of the result (in this example : 00:02:31), then we apply second seeking with appropriate time, in this case 00:00:29.

    Question is how do we get time stamp of first seeking's result ?

  • How to get time stamp of closet k-frame before a given timestamp with ffmpeg ?

    20 février 2013, par jAckOdE

    I want a ffmpeg seeking command that fast and accurate. I found this

    The solution is that we apply -ss for both input (fast seeking) and output (accurate seeking). The question is that if the input seeking is not accurate how can we be sure that the seeking position is accurate.

    For example : as the example used in the link, if we want to seek to 00:03:00, the command is something likes

    ffmpeg -ss 00:02:30 -i ... -ss 00:00:30
    As said, the first seeking will seek to somewhere else not 00:02:30, say 00:02:31. and after applying second seek, the final result would be 00:03:01- NOT what we want. Is that correct ?

    Where does fist seeking seek to ? Does it seek to k-frame that closet to 00:02:30 ?

    If so, here is my thought, correct me if i'm wrong : after first seeking, we get the timestamp of the result (in this example : 00:02:31), then we apply second seeking with appropriate time, in this case 00:00:29.

    Question is how do we get time stamp of first seeking's result ?