Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/masques

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (60)

  • La file d’attente de SPIPmotion

    28 novembre 2010, par

    Une file d’attente stockée dans la base de donnée
    Lors de son installation, SPIPmotion crée une nouvelle table dans la base de donnée intitulée spip_spipmotion_attentes.
    Cette nouvelle table est constituée des champs suivants : id_spipmotion_attente, l’identifiant numérique unique de la tâche à traiter ; id_document, l’identifiant numérique du document original à encoder ; id_objet l’identifiant unique de l’objet auquel le document encodé devra être attaché automatiquement ; objet, le type d’objet auquel (...)

  • Websites made ​​with MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    This page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.

  • Creating farms of unique websites

    13 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
    This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)

Sur d’autres sites (5663)

  • ffmpeg's strange behaviour-Conversion started when I close my application

    16 décembre 2013, par m.qayyum

    I'm using ffmpeg in my application to rotate video, but problem is that when I start conversion ffmpeg only shows it's version information and not start the actual conversion, but when I close my application ffmpeg process remains in Running Processes in Taskbar and start to convert the file.

    ffmpeg output
    enter image description here

    Here is my code, please tell me where i'm doing it wrong.

    void ConvertVideo(object[] arr) {

       string Argument = (string)arr[0];
       string OutputFolder = (string)arr[1];
       string ConvertedFile = (string)arr[2];


       UpdateStatus("Converting! Please wait...");
       ffmpeg = new Process();
       ffmpeg.StartInfo.WindowStyle = ProcessWindowStyle.Hidden;
       ffmpeg.StartInfo.FileName = "ffmpeg.exe";
       ffmpeg.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false;
       ffmpeg.StartInfo.RedirectStandardError = true;
       ffmpeg.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true;
       ffmpeg.StartInfo.CreateNoWindow = true;
       ffmpeg.StartInfo.Arguments = Argument;
       ffmpeg.Start();
       myStreamReader = ffmpeg.StandardError;
       outputLine = myStreamReader.ReadLine();
       UpdateRTB(outputLine);//Write line to ritchtextbox
       do
       {
           if (outputLine.Contains("muxing overhead"))
           {
               UpdateStatus("Muxing video");
           }

           if (outputLine.StartsWith("frame"))
           {
               UpdateStatus("Converting video");
           }
       }
       while (!(ffmpeg.HasExited & (string.Compare(outputLine, "") == 0 | outputLine == null)));
       ffmpeg.Close();
       myStreamReader.Close();
       UpdateStatus("Convertion completed successfully");
    }
  • Comparing PSNR of two videos, possibly with ffmpeg ?

    22 décembre 2016, par UnixNerd

    I would like to compare a large number of videos to a good reference video in order to find videos with poor quality. I want to do this in a batch mode by calling a command line utility, I’m already using ffmpeg in this manner to grab video frames.

    ffmpg will give me a PSNR value to compare the input and output videos if I transcode a video. I was under the impression I could use something like this to compare two separate videos but can’t find a way to do it.

    Would I be better grabbing a single frame from each video and comparing those somehow ? PSNR may not be the best option for me ?

    I’m not looking for minor differences in quality but for major differences such a sync problems or large amounts of snow.

    Any suggestions ? Thanks in advance :-)

  • Revision 5215b83aea : Simplifying and inlining k_cvtlo_epi16 and k_cvthi_epi16 Simplify the k_cvtlo_e

    3 octobre 2013, par A.Mahfoodh

    Changed Paths :
     Modify /vp9/encoder/x86/vp9_dct32x32_sse2.c



    Simplifying and inlining k_cvtlo_epi16 and k_cvthi_epi16

    Simplify the k_cvtlo_epi16 and k_cvthi_epi16 to only two
    instructions. Then inlined them.

    quoting from intel MMX_App_Compute_16bit_Vector.pdf‎
    "The PMADDWD instruction multiplies four
    pairs of 16-bit numbers and produces partial sums of the results
    and can do so once per clock (with a three-clock latency)."
    so I am assuming that there will be three clock overhead after the
    last _mm_madd_pi16 command.
    Even with the overhead the number of clocks in general should be
    smaller. I am not sure though becasue I could not find information
    about number of clocks required for instructions in k_cvtlo_epi16
    and k_cvthi_epi16. I will run a test and compare the execution time.

    Change-Id : Ieda4aa338f69ad3dd196ac6e7892da3cf1b47ea7