Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (74)

  • MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version

    25 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
    The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
    To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
    If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...)

  • MediaSPIP version 0.1 Beta

    16 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP 0.1 beta est la première version de MediaSPIP décrétée comme "utilisable".
    Le fichier zip ici présent contient uniquement les sources de MediaSPIP en version standalone.
    Pour avoir une installation fonctionnelle, il est nécessaire d’installer manuellement l’ensemble des dépendances logicielles sur le serveur.
    Si vous souhaitez utiliser cette archive pour une installation en mode ferme, il vous faudra également procéder à d’autres modifications (...)

  • Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond

    5 septembre 2013, par

    Certains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;

Sur d’autres sites (13519)

  • test : hlsenc : Make the hls_fmp4 sample file name match the target

    1er août 2020, par Martin Storsjö
    test : hlsenc : Make the hls_fmp4 sample file name match the target
    

    Previously, with the file name not matching the target, the files
    were regenerated every time fate is rerun - contrary to the other
    test targets in the same file. (While regenerating it every time
    might be desireable, as that's what the test is about, the file
    at least has a dependency on the ffmpeg executable, making them
    regenerated every time the executable is updated - and this change
    at least makes it consistent with the rest.)

    Signed-off-by : Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>

    • [DH] tests/fate/hlsenc.mak
  • avcodec/ituh263dec : Make the condition for the studio slice start code match between...

    14 septembre 2019, par Michael Niedermayer
    avcodec/ituh263dec : Make the condition for the studio slice start code match between ff_h263_resync() and ff_mpeg4_decode_studio_slice_header()
    

    If they mismatch an infinite loop can occur
    Fixes : Timeout (infinite loop)
    Fixes : 17043/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_MPEG4_fuzzer-5695051748868096

    Found-by : continuous fuzzing process https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpeg
    Signed-off-by : Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>

    • [DH] libavcodec/ituh263dec.c
  • lavu/pixdesc : favour formats where depth and subsampling exactly match

    8 septembre 2022, par Philip Langdale
    lavu/pixdesc : favour formats where depth and subsampling exactly match
    

    Since introducing the various packed formats used by VAAPI (and p012),
    we've noticed that there's actually a gap in how
    av_find_best_pix_fmt_of_2 works. It doesn't actually assign any value
    to having the same bit depth as the source format, when comparing
    against formats with a higher bit depth. This usually doesn't matter,
    because av_get_padded_bits_per_pixel() will account for it.

    However, as many of these formats use padding internally, we find that
    av_get_padded_bits_per_pixel() actually returns the same value for the
    10 bit, 12 bit, 16 bit flavours, etc. In these tied situations, we end
    up just picking the first of the two provided formats, even if the
    second one should be preferred because it matches the actual bit depth.

    This bug already existed if you tried to compare yuv420p10 against p016
    and p010, for example, but it simply hadn't come up before so we never
    noticed.

    But now, we actually got a situation in the VAAPI VP9 decoder where it
    offers both p010 and p012 because Profile 3 could be either depth and
    ends up picking p012 for 10 bit content due to the ordering of the
    testing.

    In addition, in the process of testing the fix, I realised we have the
    same gap when it comes to chroma subsampling - we do not favour a
    format that has exactly the same subsampling vs one with less
    subsampling when all else is equal.

    To fix this, I'm introducing a small score penalty if the bit depth or
    subsampling doesn't exactly match the source format. This will break
    the tie in favour of the format with the exact match, but not offset
    any of the other scoring penalties we already have.

    I have added a set of tests around these formats which will fail
    without this fix.

    • [DH] libavutil/pixdesc.c
    • [DH] libavutil/pixdesc.h
    • [DH] libavutil/tests/pixfmt_best.c
    • [DH] libavutil/version.h
    • [DH] tests/ref/fate/pixfmt_best