
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Rennes Emotion Map 2010-11
19 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Juillet 2013
Langue : français
Type : Texte
Autres articles (56)
-
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir -
HTML5 audio and video support
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...) -
Support audio et vidéo HTML5
10 avril 2011MediaSPIP utilise les balises HTML5 video et audio pour la lecture de documents multimedia en profitant des dernières innovations du W3C supportées par les navigateurs modernes.
Pour les navigateurs plus anciens, le lecteur flash Flowplayer est utilisé.
Le lecteur HTML5 utilisé a été spécifiquement créé pour MediaSPIP : il est complètement modifiable graphiquement pour correspondre à un thème choisi.
Ces technologies permettent de distribuer vidéo et son à la fois sur des ordinateurs conventionnels (...)
Sur d’autres sites (9754)
-
Anomalie #3501 : Les forums supprimés restent en base
22 juillet 2015, par b bHop, le commentaire suivant pose la même question :
http://zone.spip.org/trac/spip-zone/browser/_core_/plugins/forum/forum_pipelines.php#L280
D’après ce que je vois, on masque l’IP des messages après 4 mois pour être en règle avec la CNIL, cf :
http://zone.spip.org/trac/spip-zone/browser/_core_/plugins/forum/forum_pipelines.php#L303
Du coup, on pourrait virer les messages à la poubelle et marqués comme spam après 4 mois ? D’autres avis ?
-
Anomalie #2985 (Nouveau) : Les docs attachés à un auteur ne sont pas visibles pour les rédacs dans...
26 avril 2013, par Suske -Voir http://forum.spip.net/fr_251736.html
Je confirme.
Par contre ils s’afficheraient dans le public, ce que je veux bien croire mais pas testé.
Une question d’autorisation j’imagine.
-
Trolls in trouble
6 juin 2013, par Mans — Law and libertyLife as a patent troll is hopefully set to get more difficult. In a memo describing patent trolls as a “drain on the American economy,” the White House this week outlined a number of steps it is taking to stem this evil tide. Chiming in, the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (where patent cases are heard) in a New York Times op-ed laments the toll patent trolling is taking on the industry, and urges judges to use powers already at their disposal to make the practice less attractive. However, while certainly a step in the right direction, these measures all fail to address the more fundamental properties of the patent system allowing trolls to exist in the first place.
System and method for patent trolling
Most patent trolling operations comprise the same basic elements :
- One or more patents with broad claims.
- The patents of (1) acquired by an otherwise non-practising entity (troll).
- The entity of (2) filing numerous lawsuits alleging infringement of the patents of (1).
- The lawsuits of (3) targeting end users or retailers.
- The lawsuits of (3) listing as plaintiffs difficult to trace shell companies.
The recent legislative actions all take aim at the latter entries in this list. In so doing, they will no doubt cripple the trolls, but the trolls will remain alive, ready to resume their wicked ways once a new loophole is found in the system.
To kill a patent troll
As Judge Rader and his co-authors point out in the New York Times, “the problem stems largely from the fact that, [...] trolls have an important strategic advantage over their adversaries : they don’t make anything.” This is the heart of the troll, and this is where the blow should be struck. Our weapon shall be the mightiest judicial sword of all, the Constitution.
The United States Constitution contains (in Article I, Section 8) the foundation for the patent system (emphasis mine) :
The Congress shall have Power [...] To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
Patent trolls are typically not inventors. They are merely hoarders of other people’s discarded inventions, and that allowing others to reap the benefits of an inventor’s work would somehow promote progress should be a tough argument. Indeed, it is the dissociation between investment and reward which has allowed the patent trolls to rise and prosper.
In light of the above, the solution to the troll menace is actually strikingly simple : make patents non-transferable.
Having the inventor retain the rights to his or her inventions (works for hire still being recognised), would render the establishment of non-practising entities, which most trolls are, virtually impossible. The original purpose of patents, to protect the investment of inventors, would remain unaffected, if not strengthened, by such a change.
Links