
Recherche avancée
Médias (17)
-
Matmos - Action at a Distance
15 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
DJ Dolores - Oslodum 2004 (includes (cc) sample of “Oslodum” by Gilberto Gil)
15 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Danger Mouse & Jemini - What U Sittin’ On ? (starring Cee Lo and Tha Alkaholiks)
15 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Cornelius - Wataridori 2
15 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
The Rapture - Sister Saviour (Blackstrobe Remix)
15 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Chuck D with Fine Arts Militia - No Meaning No
15 septembre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Septembre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
Autres articles (41)
-
XMP PHP
13 mai 2011, parDixit Wikipedia, XMP signifie :
Extensible Metadata Platform ou XMP est un format de métadonnées basé sur XML utilisé dans les applications PDF, de photographie et de graphisme. Il a été lancé par Adobe Systems en avril 2001 en étant intégré à la version 5.0 d’Adobe Acrobat.
Étant basé sur XML, il gère un ensemble de tags dynamiques pour l’utilisation dans le cadre du Web sémantique.
XMP permet d’enregistrer sous forme d’un document XML des informations relatives à un fichier : titre, auteur, historique (...) -
Participer à sa documentation
10 avril 2011La documentation est un des travaux les plus importants et les plus contraignants lors de la réalisation d’un outil technique.
Tout apport extérieur à ce sujet est primordial : la critique de l’existant ; la participation à la rédaction d’articles orientés : utilisateur (administrateur de MediaSPIP ou simplement producteur de contenu) ; développeur ; la création de screencasts d’explication ; la traduction de la documentation dans une nouvelle langue ;
Pour ce faire, vous pouvez vous inscrire sur (...) -
Encodage et transformation en formats lisibles sur Internet
10 avril 2011MediaSPIP transforme et ré-encode les documents mis en ligne afin de les rendre lisibles sur Internet et automatiquement utilisables sans intervention du créateur de contenu.
Les vidéos sont automatiquement encodées dans les formats supportés par HTML5 : MP4, Ogv et WebM. La version "MP4" est également utilisée pour le lecteur flash de secours nécessaire aux anciens navigateurs.
Les documents audios sont également ré-encodés dans les deux formats utilisables par HTML5 :MP3 et Ogg. La version "MP3" (...)
Sur d’autres sites (6693)
-
The use cases for a element in HTML
27 novembre 2012, par silviaThe W3C HTML WG and the WHATWG are currently discussing the introduction of a <main> element into HTML.
The <main> element has been proposed by Steve Faulkner and is specified in a draft extension spec which is about to be accepted as a FPWD (first public working draft) by the W3C HTML WG. This implies that the W3C HTML WG will be looking for implementations and for feedback by implementers on this spec.
I am supportive of the introduction of a <main> element into HTML. However, I believe that the current spec and use case list don’t make a good enough case for its introduction. Here are my thoughts.
Main use case : accessibility
In my opinion, the main use case for the introduction of <main> is accessibility.
Like any other users, when blind users want to perceive a Web page/application, they need to have a quick means of grasping the content of a page. Since they cannot visually scan the layout and thus determine where the main content is, they use accessibility technology (AT) to find what is known as “landmarks”.
“Landmarks” tell the user what semantic content is on a page : a header (such as a banner), a search box, a navigation menu, some asides (also called complementary content), a footer, …. and the most important part : the main content of the page. It is this main content that a blind user most often wants to skip to directly.
In the days of HTML4, a hidden “skip to content” link at the beginning of the Web page was used as a means to help blind users access the main content.
In the days of ARIA, the aria @role=main enables authors to avoid a hidden link and instead mark the element where the main content begins to allow direct access to the main content. This attribute is supported by AT – in particular screen readers – by making it part of the landmarks that AT can directly skip to.
Both the hidden link and the ARIA @role=main approaches are, however, band aids : they are being used by those of us that make “finished” Web pages accessible by adding specific extra markup.
A world where ARIA is not necessary and where accessibility developers would be out of a job because the normal markup that everyone writes already creates accessible Web sites/applications would be much preferable over the current world of band-aids.
Therefore, to me, the primary use case for a <main> element is to achieve exactly this better world and not require specialized markup to tell a user (or a tool) where the main content on a page starts.
An immediate effect would be that pages that have a <main> element will expose a “main” landmark to blind and vision-impaired users that will enable them to directly access that main content on the page without having to wade through other text on the page. Without a <main> element, this functionality can currently only be provided using heuristics to skip other semantic and structural elements and is for this reason not typically implemented in AT.
Other use cases
The <main> element is a semantic element not unlike other new semantic elements such as <header>, <footer>, <aside>, <article>, <nav>, or <section>. Thus, it can also serve other uses where the main content on a Web page/Web application needs to be identified.
Data mining
For data mining of Web content, the identification of the main content is one of the key challenges. Many scholarly articles have been published on this topic. This stackoverflow article references and suggests a multitude of approaches, but the accepted answer says “there’s no way to do this that’s guaranteed to work”. This is because Web pages are inherently complex and many <div>, <p>, <iframe> and other elements are used to provide markup for styling, notifications, ads, analytics and other use cases that are necessary to make a Web page complete, but don’t contribute to what a user consumes as semantically rich content. A <main> element will allow authors to pro-actively direct data mining tools to the main content.
Search engines
One particularly important “data mining” tool are search engines. They, too, have a hard time to identify which sections of a Web page are more important than others and employ many heuristics to do so, see e.g. this ACM article. Yet, they still disappoint with poor results pointing to findings of keywords in little relevant sections of a page rather than ranking Web pages higher where the keywords turn up in the main content area. A <main> element would be able to help search engines give text in main content areas a higher weight and prefer them over other areas of the Web page. It would be able to rank different Web pages depending on where on the page the search words are found. The <main> element will be an additional hint that search engines will digest.
Visual focus
On small devices, the display of Web pages designed for Desktop often causes confusion as to where the main content can be found and read, in particular when the text ends up being too small to be readable. It would be nice if browsers on small devices had a functionality (maybe a default setting) where Web pages would start being displayed as zoomed in on the main content. This could alleviate some of the headaches of responsive Web design, where the recommendation is to show high priority content as the first content. Right now this problem is addressed through stylesheets that re-layout the page differently depending on device, but again this is a band-aid solution. Explicit semantic markup of the main content can solve this problem more elegantly.
Styling
Finally, naturally, <main> would also be used to style the main content differently from others. You can e.g. replace a semantically meaningless <div id=”main”> with a semantically meaningful <main> where their position is identical. My analysis below shows, that this is not always the case, since oftentimes <div id=”main”> is used to group everything together that is not the header – in particular where there are multiple columns. Thus, the ease of styling a <main> element is only a positive side effect and not actually a real use case. It does make it easier, however, to adapt the style of the main content e.g. with media queries.
Proposed alternative solutions
It has been proposed that existing markup serves to satisfy the use cases that <main> has been proposed for. Let’s analyse these on some of the most popular Web sites. First let’s list the propsed algorithms.
Proposed solution No 1 : Scooby-Doo
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote : | The main content is whatever content isn’t | marked up as not being main content (anything not marked up with <header>, | <aside>, <nav>, etc).
This implies that the first element that is not a <header>, <aside>, <nav>, or <footer> will be the element that we want to give to a blind user as the location where they should start reading. The algorithm is implemented in https://gist.github.com/4032962.
Proposed solution No 2 : First article element
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote : | On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Ian Yang wrote : | > | > That’s a good idea. We really need an element to wrap all the <p>s, | > <ul>s, <ol>s, <figure>s, <table>s ... etc of a blog post. | | That’s called <article>.
This approach identifies the first <article> element on the page as containing the main content. Here’s the algorithm for this approach.
Proposed solution No 3 : An example heuristic approach
The readability plugin has been developed to make Web pages readable by essentially removing all the non-main content from a page. An early source of readability is available. This demonstrates what a heuristic approach can perform.
Analysing alternative solutions
Comparison
I’ve picked 4 typical Websites (top on Alexa) to analyse how these three different approaches fare. Ideally, I’d like to simply apply the above three scripts and compare pictures. However, since the semantic HTML5 elements <header>, <aside>, <nav>, and <footer> are not actually used by any of these Web sites, I don’t actually have this choice.
So, instead, I decided to make some assumptions of where these semantic elements would be used and what the outcome of applying the first two algorithms would be. I can then compare it to the third, which is a product so we can take screenshots.
Google.com
http://google.com – search for “Scooby Doo”.
The search results page would likely be built with :
- a <nav> menu for the Google bar
- a <header> for the search bar
- another <header> for the login section
- another <nav> menu for the search types
- a <div> to contain the rest of the page
- a <div> for the app bar with the search number
- a few <aside>s for the left and right column
- a set of <article>s for the search results
“Scooby Doo” would find the first element after the headers as the “main content”. This is the element before the app bar in this case. Interestingly, there is a <div @id=main> already in the current Google results page, which “Scooby Doo” would likely also pick. However, there are a nav bar and two asides in this div, which clearly should not be part of the “main content”. Google actually placed a @role=main on a different element, namely the one that encapsulates all the search results.“First Article” would find the first search result as the “main content”. While not quite the same as what Google intended – namely all search results – it is close enough to be useful.
The “readability” result is interesting, since it is not able to identify the main text on the page. It is actually aware of this problem and brings a warning before displaying this page :
Facebook.com
A user page would likely be built with :
- a <header> bar for the search and login bar
- a <div> to contain the rest of the page
- an <aside> for the left column
- a <div> to contain the center and right column
- an <aside> for the right column
- a <header> to contain the center column “megaphone”
- a <div> for the status posting
- a set of <article>s for the home stream
“Scooby Doo” would find the first element after the headers as the “main content”. This is the element that contains all three columns. It’s actually a <div @id=content> already in the current Facebook user page, which “Scooby Doo” would likely also pick. However, Facebook selected a different element to place the @role=main : the center column.“First Article” would find the first news item in the home stream. This is clearly not what Facebook intended, since they placed the @role=main on the center column, above the first blog post’s title. “First Article” would miss that title and the status posting.
The “readability” result again disappoints but warns that it failed :
YouTube.com
A video page would likely be built with :
- a <header> bar for the search and login bar
- a <nav> for the menu
- a <div> to contain the rest of the page
- a <header> for the video title and channel links
- a <div> to contain the video with controls
- a <div> to contain the center and right column
- an <aside> for the right column with an <article> per related video
- an <aside> for the information below the video
- a <article> per comment below the video
“Scooby Doo” would find the first element after the headers as the “main content”. This is the element that contains the rest of the page. It’s actually a <div @id=content> already in the current YouTube video page, which “Scooby Doo” would likely also pick. However, YouTube’s related videos and comments are unlikely to be what the user would regard as “main content” – it’s the video they are after, which generously has a <div id=watch-player>.“First Article” would find the first related video or comment in the home stream. This is clearly not what YouTube intends.
The “readability” result is not quite as unusable, but still very bare :
Wikipedia.com
http://wikipedia.com (“Overscan” page)
A Wikipedia page would likely be built with :
- a <header> bar for the search, login and menu items
- a <div> to contain the rest of the page
- an &ls; article> with title and lots of text
- <article> an <aside> with the table of contents
- several <aside>s for the left column
Good news : “Scooby Doo” would find the first element after the headers as the “main content”. This is the element that contains the rest of the page. It’s actually a <div id=”content” role=”main”> element on Wikipedia, which “Scooby Doo” would likely also pick.“First Article” would find the title and text of the main element on the page, but it would also include an <aside>.
The “readability” result is also in agreement.
Results
In the following table we have summarised the results for the experiments :
Site Scooby-Doo First article Readability Google.com FAIL SUCCESS FAIL Facebook.com FAIL FAIL FAIL YouTube.com FAIL FAIL FAIL Wikipedia.com SUCCESS SUCCESS SUCCESS Clearly, Wikipedia is the prime example of a site where even the simple approaches find it easy to determine the main content on the page. WordPress blogs are similarly successful. Almost any other site, including news sites, social networks and search engine sites are petty hopeless with the proposed approaches, because there are too many elements that are used for layout or other purposes (notifications, hidden areas) such that the pre-determined list of semantic elements that are available simply don’t suffice to mark up a Web page/application completely.
Conclusion
It seems that in general it is impossible to determine which element(s) on a Web page should be the “main” piece of content that accessibility tools jump to when requested, that a search engine should put their focus on, or that should be highlighted to a general user to read. It would be very useful if the author of the Web page would provide a hint through a <main> element where that main content is to be found.
I think that the <main> element becomes particularly useful when combined with a default keyboard shortcut in browsers as proposed by Steve : we may actually find that non-accessibility users will also start making use of this shortcut, e.g. to get to videos on YouTube pages directly without having to tab over search boxes and other interactive elements, etc. Worthwhile markup indeed.
-
How to reduce size of moov atom of H.264 movies to improve streaming start for smartphones ?
14 avril 2013, par alebedevWe run a video service streaming movies to smartphones (iOS&Android).
We are encoding in H.264+AAC and using the mp4 container.
We have a problem that long movies (60 minutes+) take a very long time to
start playing and have tracked this down to the large size of moov
atom for these movies.
For 110 minute movies the atom is as large as 4.2Mb which obviously takes a long
time to download to a smart-phone over 3G !Is there anyway to make the moov atom smaller ? We can reduce it bit
by dropping the audio sampling rate, but obviously anything below 22kHz
would not really be acceptable.We are using ffmpeg as the encoder, and MP4Box to move the metadata
to the front of the file. Is there any way to get it to make
a smaller moov ? Any other encoders out there which make a smaller moov ?For example...
Big size (280 Mb, 1h 49min) streamable mp4 (h.264, AAC) file have a big header size (4.2 Mb). File was encoded by two pass ffmpeg and MP4Box for replacing metadata into beginning of the file :
/usr/bin/ffmpeg -i /var/lib/encoder/incoming/2388 -aspect 320:210 -threads 8 -vcodec libx264 -profile baseline -level 13 -flags +loop+mv4 -cmp 256 -partitions +parti4x4+parti8x8+partp4x4+partp8x8+partb8x8 -me_method hex -subq 7 -trellis 1 -refs 5 -bf 0 -me_range 16 -g 250 -keyint_min 25 -sc_threshold 40 -i_qfactor 0.71 -qmin 10 -qmax 51 -qdiff 4 -b:v 270k -maxrate 270k -bufsize 270k -g 30 -passlogfile /tmp/mediaservice/3100/video-IPH.ffmpeg -an -f rawvideo -pass 1 -y /dev/null
/usr/bin/ffmpeg -i /var/lib/encoder/incoming/2388 -aspect 320:210 -threads 8 -vcodec libx264 -profile baseline -level 13 -flags +loop+mv4 -cmp 256 -partitions +parti4x4+parti8x8+partp4x4+partp8x8+partb8x8 -me_method hex -subq 7 -trellis 1 -refs 5 -bf 0 -me_range 16 -g 250 -keyint_min 25 -sc_threshold 40 -i_qfactor 0.71 -qmin 10 -qmax 51 -qdiff 4 -b:v 270k -maxrate 270k -bufsize 270k -g 30 -passlogfile /tmp/mediaservice/3100/video-IPH.ffmpeg -acodec libfaac -ac 2 -b:a 32k -ar 44100 -f mp4 -pass 2 -y /var/lib/encoder/encoded/3100/video-IPH.mp4
/usr/bin/MP4Box -quiet -tmp /tmp/mediaservice/3100/ -inter 500 /var/lib/encoder/encoded/3100/video-IPH.mp4Media info (audio sample rate = 44100) :
General
Count : 278
Count of stream of this kind : 1
Kind of stream : General
Kind of stream : General
Stream identifier : 0
Count of video streams : 1
Count of audio streams : 1
Video_Format_List : AVC
Video_Format_WithHint_List : AVC
Codecs Video : AVC
Audio_Format_List : AAC
Audio_Format_WithHint_List : AAC
Audio codecs : AAC LC
Complete name : 1348645218_970458_2465.iph.mp4
File name : 1348645218_970458_2465.iph.mp4
File extension : mp4
Format : MPEG-4
Format : MPEG-4
Format/Extensions usually used : mp4 m4v m4a m4b m4p 3gpp 3gp 3gpp2 3g2 k3g jpm jpx mqv ismv isma f4v
Commercial name : MPEG-4
Format profile : Base Media
Internet media type : video/mp4
Codec ID : isom
Codec ID/Url : http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html
Codec : MPEG-4
Codec : MPEG-4
Codec/Extensions usually used : mp4 m4v m4a m4b m4p 3gpp 3gp 3gpp2 3g2 k3g jpm jpx mqv ismv isma f4v
File size : 272703970
File size : 260 MiB
File size : 260 MiB
File size : 260 MiB
File size : 260 MiB
File size : 260.1 MiB
Duration : 6556027
Duration : 1h 49mn
Duration : 1h 49mn 16s 27ms
Duration : 1h 49mn
Duration : 01:49:16.027
Overall bit rate : 332767
Overall bit rate : 333 Kbps
Stream size : 4230761
Stream size : 4.03 MiB (2%)
Stream size : 4 MiB
Stream size : 4.0 MiB
Stream size : 4.03 MiB
Stream size : 4.035 MiB
Stream size : 4.03 MiB (2%)
Proportion of this stream : 0.01551
HeaderSize : 4230683
DataSize : 268473217
FooterSize : 70
IsStreamable : Yes
File last modification date : UTC 2012-09-26 12:38:19
File last modification date (local) : 2012-09-26 21:38:19
Writing application : Lavf54.6.100
Video
Count : 201
Count of stream of this kind : 1
Kind of stream : Video
Kind of stream : Video
Stream identifier : 0
ID : 1
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format/Url : http://developers.videolan.org/x264.html
Commercial name : AVC
Format profile : Baseline@L1.3
Format settings : 5 Ref Frames
Format settings, CABAC : No
Format settings, CABAC : No
Format settings, ReFrames : 5
Format settings, ReFrames : 5 frames
Format settings, GOP : M=1, N=30
Internet media type : video/H264
Codec ID : avc1
Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
Codec ID/Url : http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone.html
Codec : AVC
Codec : AVC
Codec/Family : AVC
Codec/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Codec/Url : http://developers.videolan.org/x264.html
Codec/CC : avc1
Codec profile : Baseline@L1.3
Codec settings : 5 Ref Frames
Codec settings, CABAC : No
Codec_Settings_RefFrames : 5
Duration : 6556017
Duration : 01:49:16.017
Bit rate : 270000
Bit rate : 270 Kbps
Width : 480
Width : 480 pixels
Height : 270
Height : 270 pixels
Pixel aspect ratio : 1.000
Display aspect ratio : 1.778
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Rotation : 0.000
Frame rate mode : CFR
Frame rate mode : Constant
FrameRate_Mode_Original : VFR
Frame rate : 29.970
Frame rate : 29.970 fps
Frame count : 196484
Resolution : 8
Resolution : 8 bits
Colorimetry : 4:2:0
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Scan type : Progressive
Interlacement : PPF
Interlacement : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.070
Stream size : 220159060
Stream size : 210 MiB (81%)
Stream size : 210 MiB
Stream size : 210 MiB
Stream size : 210 MiB
Stream size : 210.0 MiB
Stream size : 210 MiB (81%)
Proportion of this stream : 0.80732
Writing library : x264 - core 125
Writing library : x264 core 125
Writing library/Name : x264
Writing library/Version : core 125
Encoding settings : cabac=0 / ref=5 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x1:0x131 / me=hex / subme=7 / psy=1 / psy_rd=1.00:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=1 / 8x8dct=0 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=8 / lookahead_threads=1 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=0 / weightp=0 / keyint=30 / keyint_min=16 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=30 / rc=2pass / mbtree=1 / bitrate=270 / ratetol=1.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=10 / qpmax=51 / qpstep=4 / cplxblur=20.0 / qblur=0.5 / vbv_maxrate=270 / vbv_bufsize=270 / nal_hrd=none / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:1.00
Tagged date : UTC 2012-09-25 07:21:37
Audio
Count : 169
Count of stream of this kind : 1
Kind of stream : Audio
Kind of stream : Audio
Stream identifier : 0
ID : 2
ID : 2
Format : AAC
Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
Commercial name : AAC
Format profile : LC
Codec ID : 40
Codec : AAC LC
Codec : AAC LC
Codec/Family : AAC
Codec/CC : 40
Duration : 6556027
Duration : 1h 49mn
Duration : 1h 49mn 16s 27ms
Duration : 1h 49mn
Duration : 01:49:16.027
Bit rate mode : VBR
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 58955
Bit rate : 59.0 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 270000
Maximum bit rate : 270 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Channel positions : 2/0/0
Sampling rate : 44100
Sampling rate : 44.1 KHz
Samples count : 289120791
Compression mode : Lossy
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 48314149
Stream size : 46.1 MiB (18%)
Stream size : 46 MiB
Stream size : 46 MiB
Stream size : 46.1 MiB
Stream size : 46.08 MiB
Stream size : 46.1 MiB (18%)
Proportion of this stream : 0.17717
Tagged date : UTC 2012-09-25 07:21:37Moov atom info (/moov/trak[0] - video, /moov/trak[1] - audio) sample rate 44100 :
(look stsz and stts nodes in trak)Atom ftyp @ 0 of size: 32, ends @ 32
Atom moov @ 32 of size: 4230651, ends @ 4230683
Atom mvhd @ 40 of size: 108, ends @ 148
Atom trak @ 148 of size: 868970, ends @ 869118
Atom tkhd @ 156 of size: 92, ends @ 248
Atom edts @ 248 of size: 36, ends @ 284
Atom elst @ 256 of size: 28, ends @ 284
Atom mdia @ 284 of size: 868834, ends @ 869118
Atom mdhd @ 292 of size: 32, ends @ 324
Atom hdlr @ 324 of size: 45, ends @ 369
Atom minf @ 369 of size: 868749, ends @ 869118
Atom vmhd @ 377 of size: 20, ends @ 397
Atom dinf @ 397 of size: 36, ends @ 433
Atom dref @ 405 of size: 28, ends @ 433
Atom stbl @ 433 of size: 868685, ends @ 869118
Atom stsd @ 441 of size: 149, ends @ 590
Atom avc1 @ 457 of size: 133, ends @ 590
Atom avcC @ 543 of size: 47, ends @ 590
Atom stts @ 590 of size: 24, ends @ 614
Atom stss @ 614 of size: 26340, ends @ 26954
Atom stsc @ 26954 of size: 52, ends @ 27006
Atom stsz @ 27006 of size: 785956, ends @ 812962
Atom stco @ 812962 of size: 56156, ends @ 869118
Atom trak @ 869118 of size: 3361468, ends @ 4230586
Atom tkhd @ 869126 of size: 92, ends @ 869218
Atom edts @ 869218 of size: 36, ends @ 869254
Atom elst @ 869226 of size: 28, ends @ 869254
Atom mdia @ 869254 of size: 3361332, ends @ 4230586
Atom mdhd @ 869262 of size: 32, ends @ 869294
Atom hdlr @ 869294 of size: 45, ends @ 869339
Atom minf @ 869339 of size: 3361247, ends @ 4230586
Atom smhd @ 869347 of size: 16, ends @ 869363
Atom dinf @ 869363 of size: 36, ends @ 869399
Atom dref @ 869371 of size: 28, ends @ 869399
Atom stbl @ 869399 of size: 3361187, ends @ 4230586
Atom stsd @ 869407 of size: 91, ends @ 869498
Atom mp4a @ 869423 of size: 75, ends @ 869498
Atom esds @ 869459 of size: 39, ends @ 869498
**Atom stts @ 869498 of size: 2135816, ends @ 3005314**
Atom stsc @ 3005314 of size: 39712, ends @ 3045026
**Atom stsz @ 3045026 of size: 1129400, ends @ 4174426**
Atom stco @ 4174426 of size: 56160, ends @ 4230586
Atom udta @ 4230586 of size: 97, ends @ 4230683
Atom meta @ 4230594 of size: 89, ends @ 4230683
Atom hdlr @ 4230606 of size: 33, ends @ 4230639
Atom ilst @ 4230639 of size: 44, ends @ 4230683
Atom ©too @ 4230647 of size: 36, ends @ 4230683
Atom data @ 4230655 of size: 28, ends @ 4230683
Atom mdat @ 4230683 of size: 268473217, ends @ 272703900
Atom free @ 272703900 of size: 8, ends @ 272703908
Atom free @ 272703908 of size: 62, ends @ 272703970
------------------------------------------------------
Total size: 272703970 bytes; 50 atoms total. AtomicParsley version: 0.9.0 (utf8)
Media data: 268473217 bytes; 4230753 bytes all other atoms (1.551% atom overhead).
Total free atom space: 70 bytes; 0.000% waste. Padding available: 0 bytes.
------------------------------------------------------After reencoding this movie with audio sample rate 11025 header size much less :
Media info (audio sample rate = 11025) : (crop duplicate info)
General
***
HeaderSize : 1276359
Video
***
Audio
Count : 169
Count of stream of this kind : 1
Kind of stream : Audio
Kind of stream : Audio
Stream identifier : 0
ID : 2
ID : 2
Format : AAC
Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec
Commercial name : AAC
Format profile : LC
Codec ID : 40
Codec : AAC LC
Codec : AAC LC
Codec/Family : AAC
Codec/CC : 40
Duration : 6556132
Duration : 1h 49mn
Duration : 1h 49mn 16s 132ms
Duration : 1h 49mn
Duration : 01:49:16.132
Bit rate mode : VBR
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 37991
Bit rate : 38.0 Kbps
Maximum bit rate : 128000
Maximum bit rate : 128 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Channel positions : Front: L R
Channel positions : 2/0/0
Sampling rate : 11025
Sampling rate : 11.025 KHz
Samples count : 72281355
Compression mode : Lossy
Compression mode : Lossy
Stream size : 31134257
Stream size : 29.7 MiB (12%)
Stream size : 30 MiB
Stream size : 30 MiB
Stream size : 29.7 MiB
Stream size : 29.69 MiB
Stream size : 29.7 MiB (12%)
Proportion of this stream : 0.12327
Tagged date : UTC 2012-09-25 13:20:28Moov atom info (/moov/trak[0] - video, /moov/trak[1] - audio) sample rate 11025 :
Atom ftyp @ 0 of size: 32, ends @ 32
Atom moov @ 32 of size: 1276327, ends @ 1276359
Atom mvhd @ 40 of size: 108, ends @ 148
Atom trak @ 148 of size: 821662, ends @ 821810
Atom tkhd @ 156 of size: 92, ends @ 248
Atom edts @ 248 of size: 36, ends @ 284
Atom elst @ 256 of size: 28, ends @ 284
Atom mdia @ 284 of size: 821526, ends @ 821810
Atom mdhd @ 292 of size: 32, ends @ 324
Atom hdlr @ 324 of size: 45, ends @ 369
Atom minf @ 369 of size: 821441, ends @ 821810
Atom vmhd @ 377 of size: 20, ends @ 397
Atom dinf @ 397 of size: 36, ends @ 433
Atom dref @ 405 of size: 28, ends @ 433
Atom stbl @ 433 of size: 821377, ends @ 821810
Atom stsd @ 441 of size: 149, ends @ 590
Atom avc1 @ 457 of size: 133, ends @ 590
Atom avcC @ 543 of size: 47, ends @ 590
Atom stts @ 590 of size: 24, ends @ 614
Atom stss @ 614 of size: 26340, ends @ 26954
Atom stsc @ 26954 of size: 52, ends @ 27006
Atom stsz @ 27006 of size: 785956, ends @ 812962
Atom stco @ 812962 of size: 8848, ends @ 821810
Atom trak @ 821810 of size: 454452, ends @ 1276262
Atom tkhd @ 821818 of size: 92, ends @ 821910
Atom edts @ 821910 of size: 36, ends @ 821946
Atom elst @ 821918 of size: 28, ends @ 821946
Atom mdia @ 821946 of size: 454316, ends @ 1276262
Atom mdhd @ 821954 of size: 32, ends @ 821986
Atom hdlr @ 821986 of size: 45, ends @ 822031
Atom minf @ 822031 of size: 454231, ends @ 1276262
Atom smhd @ 822039 of size: 16, ends @ 822055
Atom dinf @ 822055 of size: 36, ends @ 822091
Atom dref @ 822063 of size: 28, ends @ 822091
Atom stbl @ 822091 of size: 454171, ends @ 1276262
Atom stsd @ 822099 of size: 91, ends @ 822190
Atom mp4a @ 822115 of size: 75, ends @ 822190
Atom esds @ 822151 of size: 39, ends @ 822190
Atom stts @ 822190 of size: 161368, ends @ 983558
Atom stsc @ 983558 of size: 1480, ends @ 985038
Atom stsz @ 985038 of size: 282372, ends @ 1267410
Atom stco @ 1267410 of size: 8852, ends @ 1276262
Atom udta @ 1276262 of size: 97, ends @ 1276359
Atom meta @ 1276270 of size: 89, ends @ 1276359
Atom hdlr @ 1276282 of size: 33, ends @ 1276315
Atom ilst @ 1276315 of size: 44, ends @ 1276359
Atom ©too @ 1276323 of size: 36, ends @ 1276359
Atom data @ 1276331 of size: 28, ends @ 1276359
Atom mdat @ 1276359 of size: 251293325, ends @ 252569684
Atom free @ 252569684 of size: 8, ends @ 252569692
Atom free @ 252569692 of size: 62, ends @ 252569754
------------------------------------------------------
Total size: 252569754 bytes; 50 atoms total. AtomicParsley version: 0.9.0 (utf8)
Media data: 251293325 bytes; 1276429 bytes all other atoms (0.505% atom overhead).
Total free atom space: 70 bytes; 0.000% waste. Padding available: 0 bytes.
------------------------------------------------------On slow connection this movie start playing after 30-40 seconds until header info (4.2 Mb) downloading. I need that movie start playing fast as it possible. And i have next questions :
-
How reduce size of movie header ?
-
How reduce size of
/moov[0]/trak[1]/mdia[0]/minf[0]/stbl[0] and why it so big when
sample rate 44100 ?
-
-
NAB 2010 wrapup
15 avril 2010Another year of NAB has come and gone. Making it out of Vegas with some remaining faith in humanity seems like a successful outcome. So, anything worth talking about at the show ?
First off, there’s 3d. 3D is The Next Big Thing, and that was obvious to anyone who spent half a second on the show floor. Everything from camera rigs, to post production apps, to display technology was all 3d, all the time. I’m not a huge fan of 3d in most cases, but the industry is at least feigning interest.
Luckily, at a show as big as NAB, there’s plenty of other cool stuff to see. So, what struck my fancy ?
First off, Avid and Adobe were showing new versions of Media Composer and Premiere. Both sounded pretty amazing on paper, but I must say I was somewhat underwhelmed by both in reality. Premiere felt a little rough around the edges - the Mercurial Engine wasn’t the sort of next generation tech that I expected. Media Composer 5 has some nice new tweaks, but it’s still rather Avid-y - which is good for Avid people, less interesting for the rest of us.
In other software news, Blackmagic Design was showing off some of what they’re doing with the DaVinci technology that they acquired. Software-only Da Vinci Resolve for $999 is a pretty amazing deal, and the demos were quite nice. That said, color correction is an art, so just making the technology cheaper isn’t necessarily going to dramatically change the number of folks who do it well - see Color.
Blackmagic also has a pile of new USB 3.0 hardware devices, including the absolutely gorgeous UltraStudio Pro. Makes me pine for USB 3.0 on the mac.
On the production side, we saw new cameras from just about everyone. To start at the high end, the Arri Alexa was absolutely stunning. Perhaps the nicest digital cinema footage I’ve seen. Not only that, but they’ve worked out a usable workflow, recording to ProRes plus RAW. At the price point they’re promising, the world is going to get a lot more difficult for RED.
Sony’s new XDCam EX gear is another good step forward for that format. Nothing groundbreaking, but another nice progression. I was kind of hoping we’d see 4:2:2 EX gear from them, but I suppose they need to justify the disc based formats for a while longer.
The Panasonic AG-AF100 is another interesting camera, bringing micro 4/3rds into video. The only strange thing is the recording side - AVCHD to SD cards. While I’m thrilled to see them using SD instead of P2, it sure would have been nice to have an AVCIntra option.
Finally, Canon’s 4:2:2 XF cams are a nice option for the ENG/EFP market. Nothing groundbreaking, aside from the extra color sampling, but it’s a nice step up from what they’ve been doing.
Speaking of Canon, it’s interesting to see the ways that the 5d and 7d have made their way into mainstream filmmaking. At one point, I thought they’d be relegated to the indie community - folks looking for nice DoF on a budget. Instead, they seem to have been adopted by a huge range of productions, from episodic TV to features. While they’re not right for everyone, the price and quality make them an easy choice in many cases.
One of the stars of the show for me was the GoPro, a small waterproof HD camera that ships with a variety of mounts, designed to be used in places where you couldn’t or wouldn’t use a more full featured camera. No LCD, just a record button and a wide angle lens. I bought two.
Those are the things that stand out for me. While there was plenty of interesting stuff to be seen, given the current economic conditions at the University, I wasn’t exactly in a shopping mindset. The show definitely felt more optimistic than it did last year, and companies are again pushing out new products. However, attendances was about 20% lower than 2008, and that was definitely noticeable on the show floor.