
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (50)
-
MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version
25 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...) -
MediaSPIP v0.2
21 juin 2013, parMediaSPIP 0.2 is the first MediaSPIP stable release.
Its official release date is June 21, 2013 and is announced here.
The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...) -
Contribute to translation
13 avril 2011You can help us to improve the language used in the software interface to make MediaSPIP more accessible and user-friendly. You can also translate the interface into any language that allows it to spread to new linguistic communities.
To do this, we use the translation interface of SPIP where the all the language modules of MediaSPIP are available. Just subscribe to the mailing list and request further informantion on translation.
MediaSPIP is currently available in French and English (...)
Sur d’autres sites (13677)
-
ffmpeg : replace impossible dts/pts combinations by a reasonable guess instead of...
23 septembre 2014, par Michael Niedermayer -
Anomalie #2948 : SPIP 3.0.4 et 3.0.5 + Autorité : modification impossible d’un article par le réda...
22 octobre 2014, par Thiebaut JOURDAINDans le précédent message, la phrase "Les rédacteurs peuvent modifier leur article sur l’espace public avec Crayons puis en cliquant sur enregistrer." a été rayée par erreur.
Merci
-
Compression rate (final size) ffmpeg with h263 as codec, can be improved ?
29 août 2013, par voskycWith the following data :
Sample 1 :
vcodec : H263
Duration : 4seconds
Resolution:1288/720
FR : 30fps/s
datarate : 195.135 kB/s
MP3 : 44HZ, 16bits
Size file : 5.84MB.
Sample 2 :
vcodec : H263
Duration : 4seconds
Resolution:640/480
FR : 30fps/s
datarate : 195.135 kB/s
MP3 : 44HZ, 16bits
Size file = 3.34MB.
Both in flv container.
Aren't those sizes a little bit high for 4 second video ?
I believe we are doing some kind of error or missing an optimization.
Should we decrease the datarate ?
Maybe we are missing some option for h263 encoding with FFMPEG ?.Thanks a lot in advance for your suggestions.
Note : no, we "can not" use h264. :-)