Recherche avancée

Médias (1)

Mot : - Tags -/Christian Nold

Autres articles (50)

  • Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins

    27 avril 2010, par

    Mediaspip core
    autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs

  • Publier sur MédiaSpip

    13 juin 2013

    Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
    Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir

  • Contribute to translation

    13 avril 2011

    You can help us to improve the language used in the software interface to make MediaSPIP more accessible and user-friendly. You can also translate the interface into any language that allows it to spread to new linguistic communities.
    To do this, we use the translation interface of SPIP where the all the language modules of MediaSPIP are available. Just subscribe to the mailing list and request further informantion on translation.
    MediaSPIP is currently available in French and English (...)

Sur d’autres sites (9573)

  • Is Google Analytics Accurate ? 6 Important Caveats

    8 novembre 2022, par Erin

    It’s no secret that accurate website analytics is crucial for growing your online business — and Google Analytics is often the go-to source for insights. 

    But is Google Analytics data accurate ? Can you fully trust the provided numbers ? Here’s a detailed explainer.

    How Accurate is Google Analytics ? A Data-Backed Answer 

    When properly configured, Google Analytics (Universal Analytics and Google Analytics 4) is moderately accurate for global traffic collection. That said : Google Analytics doesn’t accurately report European traffic. 

    According to GDPR provisions, sites using GA products must display a cookie consent banner. This consent is required to collect third-party cookies — a tracking mechanism for identifying users across web properties.

    Google Analytics (GA) cannot process data about the user’s visit if they rejected cookies. In such cases, your analytics reports will be incomplete.

    Cookie rejection refers to visitors declining or blocking cookies from ever being collected by a specific website (or within their browser). It immediately affects the accuracy of all metrics in Google Analytics.

    Google Analytics is not accurate in locations where cookie consent to tracking is legally required. Most consumers don’t like disruptive cookie banners or harbour concerns about their privacy — and chose to reject tracking. 

    This leaves businesses with incomplete data, which, in turn, results in : 

    • Lower traffic counts as you’re not collecting 100% of the visitor data. 
    • Loss of website optimisation capabilities. You can’t make data-backed decisions due to inconsistent reporting

    For the above reasons, many companies now consider cookieless website tracking apps that don’t require consent screen displays. 

    Why is Google Analytics Not Accurate ? 6 Causes and Solutions 

    A high rejection rate of cookie banners is the main reason for inaccurate Google Analytics reporting. In addition, your account settings can also hinder Google Analytics’ accuracy.

    If your analytics data looks wonky, check for these six Google Analytics accuracy problems. 

    You Need to Secure Consent to Cookies Collection 

    To be GDPR-compliant, you must display a cookie consent screen to all European users. Likewise, other jurisdictions and industries require similar measures for user data collection. 

    This is a nuisance for many businesses since cookie rejection undermines their remarketing capabilities. Hence, some try to maximise cookie acceptance rates with dark patterns. For example : hide the option to decline tracking or make the texts too small. 

    Cookie consent banner examples
    Banner on the left doesn’t provide an evident option to reject all cookies and nudges the user to accept tracking. Banner on the right does a better job explaining the purpose of data collection and offers a straightforward yes/no selection

    Sadly, not everyone’s treating users with respect. A joint study by German and American researchers found that only 11% of US websites (from a sample of 5,000+) use GDPR-compliant cookie banners.

    As a result, many users aren’t aware of the background data collection to which they have (or have not) given consent. Another analysis of 200,000 cookies discovered that 70% of third-party marketing cookies transfer user data outside of the EU — a practice in breach of GDPR.

    Naturally, data regulators and activities are after this issue. In April 2022, Google was pressured to introduce a ‘reject all’ cookies button to all of its products (a €150 million compliance fine likely helped with that). Whereas, noyb has lodged over 220 complaints against individual websites with deceptive cookie consent banners.

    The takeaway ? Messing up with the cookie consent mechanism can get you in legal trouble. Don’t use sneaky banners as there are better ways to collect website traffic statistics. 

    Solution : Try Matomo GDPR-Friendly Analytics 

    Fill in the gaps in your traffic analytics with Matomo – a fully GDPR-compliant product that doesn’t rely on third-party cookies for tracking web visitors. Because of how it is designed, the French data protection authority (CNIL) confirmed that Matomo can be used to collect data without tracking consent.

    With Matomo, you can track website users without asking for cookie consent. And when you do, we supply you with a compact, compliant, non-disruptive cookie banner design. 

    Your Google Tag Isn’t Embedded Correctly 

    Google Tag (gtag.js) is a web tracking script that sends data to your Google Analytics, Google Ads and Google Marketing Platform.

    A corrupted gtag.js installation can create two accuracy issues : 

    • Duplicate page tracking 
    • Missing script installation 

    Is there a way to tell if you’re affected ?

    Yes. You may have duplicate scripts installed if you have a very low bounce rate on most website pages (below 15% – 20%). The above can happen if you’re using a WordPress GA plugin and additionally embed gtag.js straight in your website code. 

    A tell-tale sign of a missing script on some pages is low/no traffic stats. Google alerts you about this with a banner : 

    Google Analytics alerts

    Solution : Use Available Troubleshooting Tools 

    Use Google Analytics Debugger extension to analyse pages with low bounce rates. Use the search bar to locate duplicate code-tracking elements. 

    Alternatively, you can use Google Tag Assistant for diagnosing snippet install and troubleshooting issues on individual pages. 

    If the above didn’t work, re-install your analytics script

    Machine Learning and Blended Data Are Applied

    Google Analytics 4 (GA4) relies a lot on machine learning and algorithmic predictions.

    By applying Google’s advanced machine learning models, the new Analytics can automatically alert you to significant trends in your data. [...] For example, it calculates churn probability so you can more efficiently invest in retaining customers.

    On the surface, the above sounds exciting. In practice, Google’s application of predictive algorithms means you’re not seeing actual data. 

    To offer a variation of cookieless tracking, Google algorithms close the gaps in reporting by creating models (i.e., data-backed predictions) instead of reporting on actual user behaviours. Therefore, your GA4 numbers may not be accurate.

    For bigger web properties (think websites with 1+ million users), Google also relies on data sampling — a practice of extrapolating data analytics, based on a data subset, rather than the entire dataset. Once again, this can lead to inconsistencies in reporting with some numbers (e.g., average conversion rates) being inflated or downplayed. 

    Solution : Try an Alternative Website Analytics App 

    Unlike GA4, Matomo reports consist of 100% unsampled data. All the aggregated reporting you see is based on real user data (not guesstimation). 

    Moreover, you can migrate from Universal Analytics (UA) to Matomo without losing access to your historical records. GA4 doesn’t yet have any backward compatibility.

    Spam and Bot Traffic Isn’t Filtered Out 

    Surprise ! 42% of all Internet traffic is generated by bots, of which 27.7% are bad ones.

    Good bots (aka crawlers) do essential web “housekeeping” tasks like indexing web pages. Bad bots distribute malware, spam contact forms, hack user accounts and do other nasty stuff. 

    A lot of such spam bots are designed specifically for web analytics apps. The goal ? Flood your dashboard with bogus data in hopes of getting some return action from your side. 

    Types of Google Analytics Spam :

    • Referral spam. Spambots hijack the referrer, displayed in your GA referral traffic report to indicate a page visit from some random website (which didn’t actually occur). 
    • Event spam. Bots generate fake events with free language entries enticing you to visit their website. 
    • Ghost traffic spam. Malicious parties can also inject fake pageviews, containing URLs that they want you to click. 

    Obviously, such spammy entities distort the real website analytics numbers. 

    Solution : Set Up Bot/Spam Filters 

    Google Analytics 4 has automatic filtering of bot traffic enabled for all tracked Web and App properties. 

    But if you’re using Universal Analytics, you’ll have to manually configure spam filtering. First, create a new view and then set up a custom filter. Program it to exclude :

    • Filter Field : Request URI
    • Filter Pattern : Bot traffic URL

    Once you’ve configured everything, validate the results using Verify this filter feature. Then repeat the process for other fishy URLs, hostnames and IP addresses. 

    You Don’t Filter Internal Traffic 

    Your team(s) spend a lot of time on your website — and their sporadic behaviours can impair your traffic counts and other website metrics.

    To keep your data “employee-free”, exclude traffic from : 

    • Your corporate IPs addresses 
    • Known personal IPs of employees (for remote workers) 

    If you also have a separate stage version of your website, you should also filter out all traffic coming from it. Your developers, contractors and marketing people spend a lot of time fiddling with your website. This can cause a big discrepancy in average time on page and engagement rates. 

    Solution : Set Internal Traffic Filters 

    Google provides instructions for excluding internal traffic from your reports using IPv4/IPv6 address filters. 

    Google Analytics IP filters

    Session Timeouts After 30 Minutes 

    After 30 minutes of inactivity, Google Analytics tracking sessions start over. Inactivity means no recorded interaction hits during this time. 

    Session timeouts can be a problem for some websites as users often pin a tab to check it back later. Because of this, you can count the same user twice or more — and this leads to skewed reporting. 

    Solution : Programme Custom Timeout Sessions

    You can codify custom cookie timeout sessions with the following code snippets : 

    Final Thoughts 

    Thanks to its scale and longevity, Google Analytics has some strong sides, but its data accuracy isn’t 100% perfect.

    The inability to capture analytics data from users who don’t consent to cookie tracking and data sampling applied to bigger web properties may be a deal-breaker for your business. 

    If that’s the case, try Matomo — a GDPR-compliant, accurate web analytics solution. Start your 21-day free trial now. No credit card required.

  • CJEU rules US cloud servers don’t comply with GDPR and what this means for web analytics

    17 juillet 2020, par Jake Thornton

    Breaking news : On July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that any cloud services hosted in the US are incapable of complying with the GDPR and EU privacy laws.

    In August 2016, the EU-US Privacy Shield framework came into effect, which “protects the fundamental rights of anyone in the EU whose personal data is transferred to the United States for commercial purposes. It allows the free transfer of data to companies that are certified in the US under the Privacy Shield.” – European Commission website

    However after today’s CJEU ruling, this Privacy Shield framework became invalidated due to significant differences between EU and US privacy laws.

    European privacy law activist Max Schrems summarises with “The Court clarified for a second time now that there is a clash between EU privacy law and US surveillance law. As the EU will not change its fundamental rights to please the NSA, the only way to overcome this clash is for the US to introduce solid privacy rights for all people – including foreigners. Surveillance reform thereby becomes crucial for the business interests of Silicon Valley.” – noyb website

    Today’s ruling also continues to spark concern into the legitimacy of US privacy laws which doesn’t fully protect people’s personal data when hosted on cloud servers based in the US.

    Web analytics hosted on US cloud servers don’t comply with GDPR

    How will this affect you ?

    For any business operating a website in the EU or if you have traffic coming to your website from EU visitors, you need to know what data you’re capturing and where this data is being stored.

    Here’s what Maja Smoltczyk (Berlin’s Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information) says :

    Controllers who transfer personal data to the USA, especially when using cloud-based services, are now required to switch immediately to service providers based in the European Union or a country that can
    ensure an adequate level of data protection. 
    The CJEU has made it refreshingly clear that data exports are not just financial decisions, as people’s fundamental rights must also be considered as a matter of priority. This ruling will put
    an end to the transfer of personal data to the USA
    for the sake of convenience or to cut costs.

    The controller is you (not Google) and by transferring data to the US you are at risk of being fined up to €20 million or 4% of your annual worldwide turnover for not being GDPR compliant. 

    It’s you who has to take action, not Google or other US companies. The court’s decision has immediate effect. While we assume there will be a grace period, companies should act now as finding and implementing alternatives solution can take a while. 

    Can no data be exported outside the EU anymore ?

    Data can still be exported outside the EU if an adequate level of data protection is guaranteed. This is the case for some trading partners of the EU such as New Zealand, Japan, Switzerland, and Canada. They have been certified by the EU as having a comparable level of privacy protection and therefore demonstrate adequacy at a country level.

    Necessary data can still flow to countries like the US too. This is for example the case when someone books a hotel in the US or when sending an email to someone in the US. Backups for disaster recovery and most other reasons don’t qualify as necessary.

    In all other cases you can still send data to countries like the US if you get explicit and informed consent from a user. Meaning the user has been informed about all possible risks of sending the data to the US and who can access the data (for example the US government).

    How this affects Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager users

    If your website is using Google Analytics, the safest bet is to deactivate it immediately. Otherwise, you must ask for consent from everyone who visits your website and inform them that the data will be processed in the United States under less strict privacy laws and all associated risks. If you don’t, you could be liable to privacy law infringements and face being fined for not complying with the GDPR. This also applies to Google Tag Manager as it transfers the IP address to the US which is considered personal data under the GDPR.

    Consent needs to be :

    • Freely given (the user must have a choice to not give consent and be able to opt out at any time) 
    • Informed (you need to disclose who is processing the data, what data is processed, where the data will be stored and how to opt out) 
    • Specific (consent is only valid for the specific informed purpose) 
    • Unambiguous (for example pre-ticked boxes or similar aren’t allowed)
    Web analytics that complies with GDPR

    If users don’t give you consent, you are not allowed to track them using Google Analytics or any other US based cloud solution.

    Update August 19, 2020

    A month after this ruling, over 100 complaints have been filed against websites for continuing to send data to the US via Google Analytics or Facebook, by the European privacy campaign group noyb. It’s clear Google and Facebook fall under US surveillance laws such as FISA 702 and the court clearly ruled these companies cannot rely on SCCs to transfer data to the US. Anyone still using Google Analytics is now at risk of facing fines and compensation damages

    How this affects Matomo users

    Our cloud servers are based in Germany.

    Matomo On-Premise users choose the location of their data themselves. If the servers are located in the EU nothing changes. If the servers are located outside the EU and the website targets EU users and tracks personal data, then you need to assess whether you are required to ask for tracking consent.

    If the data is stored inside the EU you can use Matomo without asking for any consent and you can continue tracking users even if they reject a consent screen which greatly increases the quality of your data.

    Want to avoid informing users about transferring their data to the US and all associated risks ?

    Try Matomo now for free ! No credit card required.

  • Privacy in Business : What Is It and Why Is It Important ?

    13 juillet 2022, par Erin — Privacy

    Privacy concerns loom large among consumers. Yet, businesses remain reluctant to change the old ways of doing things until they become an operational nuisance. 

    More and more businesses are slowly starting to feel the pressure to incorporate privacy best practices. But what exactly does privacy mean in business ? And why is it important for businesses to protect users’ privacy ? 

    In this blog, we’ll answer all of these questions and more. 

    What is Privacy in Business ?

    In the corporate world, privacy stands for the business decision to use collected consumer data in a safe, secure and compliant way. 

    Companies with a privacy-centred culture : 

    • Get explicit user consent to tracking, opt-ins and data sharing 
    • Collect strictly necessary data in compliance with regulations 
    • Ask for permissions to collect, process and store sensitive data 
    • Provide transparent explanations about data operationalisation and usage 
    • Have mechanisms for data collection opt-outs and data removal requests 
    • Implement security controls for storing collected data and limit access permissions to it 

    In other words : They treat consumers’ data with utmost integrity and security – and provide reassurances of ethical data usage. 

    What Are the Ethical Business Issues Related to Privacy ?

    Consumer data analytics has been around for decades. But digital technologies – ubiquitous connectivity, social media networks, data science and machine learning – increased the magnitude and sophistication of customer profiling.

    Big Tech companies like Google and Facebook, among others, capture millions of data points about users. These include general demographics data like “age” or “gender”, as well as more granular insights such as “income”, “past browsing history” or “recently visited geo-locations”. 

    When combined, such personally identifiable information (PII) can be used to approximate the user’s exact address, frequently purchased goods, political beliefs or past medical conditions. Then such information is shared with third parties such as advertisers. 

    That’s when ethical issues arise. 

    The Cambridge Analytica data scandal is a prime example of consumer data that was unethically exploited. 

    Over the years, Google also faced a series of regulatory issues surrounding consumer privacy breaches :

    • In 2021, a Google Chrome browser update put some 2.6 billion users at risk of “surveillance, manipulation and abuse” by providing third parties with data on device usage. 
    • The same year, Google was taken to court for failing to provide full disclosures on tracking performed in Google Chrome incognito mode. A $5 billion lawsuit is still pending.
    • As of 2022, Google Analytics 4 is considered GDPR non-compliant and was branded “illegal” by several European countries. 

    If you are curious, learn more about Google Analytics privacy issues

    The bigger issue ? Big Tech companies make the businesses that use their technologies (unknowingly) complicit in consumer data violations.

    In 2022, the Belgian data regulator found the official IAB Europe framework for user consent gathering in breach of GDPR. The framework was used by all major AdTech platforms to issue pop-ups for user consent to tracking. Now ad platforms must delete all data gathered through these. Biggest advertisers such as Procter & Gamble, Unilever, IBM and Mastercard among others, also received a notice about data removal and a regulatory warning on further repercussions if they fail to comply. 

    Big Tech firms have given brands unprecedented access to granular consumer data. Unrestricted access, however, also opened the door to data abuse and unethical use. 

    Examples of Unethical Data Usage by Businesses 

    • Data hoarding means excessively harvesting all available consumer data because a possibility to do so exists, often using murky consent mechanisms. Yet, 85% of collected Big Data is either dark or redundant, obsolete or trivial (ROT).
    • Invasive personalisation based on sensitive user information (or second-guesses), like a recent US marketing campaign, congratulating women on pregnancy (even if they weren’t expecting). Overall, 75% of consumers find most forms of personalisation somewhat creepy. 22% also said they’d leave for another brand due to creepy experiences.
    • Hyper-targeted advertising campaigns based on data consumers would prefer not to share. A recent investigation found that advertising platforms often assign sensitive labels to users (as part of their ad profiles), indicative of their religion, mental issues, history with abuse and so on. This allows advertisers to target such consumers with dubious ads. 

    Ultimately, excessive data collection, paired with poor data protection in business settings, results in major data breaches and costly damage control. Given that cyber attacks are on the rise, every business is vulnerable. 

    Why Should a Business Be Concerned About Protecting the Privacy of Its Customers ?

    Businesses must prioritise customer privacy because that’s what is expected of them. Globally, 89% of consumers say they care about their privacy. 

    As frequent stories about unethical data usage, excessive tracking and data breaches surface online, even more grow more concerned about protecting their data. Many publicly urge companies to take action. Others curtail their relationships with brands privately. 

    On average, 45% of consumers feel uncomfortable about sharing personal data. According to KPMG, 78% of American consumers have fears about the amount of data being collected. 40% of them also don’t trust companies to use their data ethically. Among Europeans, 41% are unwilling to share any personal data with businesses. 

    Because the demand for online privacy is rising, progressive companies now treat privacy as a competitive advantage. 

    For example, the encrypted messaging app Signal gained over 42 million active users in a year because it offers better data security and privacy protection. 

    ProtonMail, a privacy-centred email client, also amassed a 50 million user base in several years thanks to a “fundamentally stronger definition of privacy”.

    The growth of privacy-mindful businesses speaks volumes. And even more good things happen to privacy-mindful businesses : 

    • Higher consumer trust and loyalty 
    • Improved attractiveness to investors
    • Less complex compliance
    • Minimum cybersecurity exposure 
    • Better agility and innovation

    It’s time to start pursuing them ! Learn how to embed privacy and security into your operations.