
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (55)
-
Keeping control of your media in your hands
13 avril 2011, parThe vocabulary used on this site and around MediaSPIP in general, aims to avoid reference to Web 2.0 and the companies that profit from media-sharing.
While using MediaSPIP, you are invited to avoid using words like "Brand", "Cloud" and "Market".
MediaSPIP is designed to facilitate the sharing of creative media online, while allowing authors to retain complete control of their work.
MediaSPIP aims to be accessible to as many people as possible and development is based on expanding the (...) -
Les vidéos
21 avril 2011, parComme les documents de type "audio", Mediaspip affiche dans la mesure du possible les vidéos grâce à la balise html5 .
Un des inconvénients de cette balise est qu’elle n’est pas reconnue correctement par certains navigateurs (Internet Explorer pour ne pas le nommer) et que chaque navigateur ne gère en natif que certains formats de vidéos.
Son avantage principal quant à lui est de bénéficier de la prise en charge native de vidéos dans les navigateur et donc de se passer de l’utilisation de Flash et (...) -
Websites made with MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parThis page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.
Sur d’autres sites (7977)
-
Evolution #4379 : Liste des plugins necessités lien vers le dépot/annuaire de plugins
22 septembre 2019, par b bOk je vois le plan, hésite pas à proposer un patch ou un PR dans la branche de dev.
-
Your 6-step guide to increasing acquisition
2 juillet 2019, par Matomo Core Team — Analytics Tips -
Encoding videos locally or through a third party ?
7 septembre 2015, par JordanDevelopWe’re in the process on building a view uploading and sharing community right now and we’re currently developing with idea of using a third-party like Zencoder, but what makes Zencoder a better option ?
I’m sorry if i butcher up what is involved with supporting a local encoding system, so I’ll try to be vague. We plan on releasing with AWS, so why not setup an instance running ffmpeg ? I understand it’s a lot more then simply that, but if is it that difficult to find someone who can put together an instance for encoding ?
Am I right to assume most third party encoding services seem very unrealistic, price wise, for a web application who specifically focus on encoding large amounts of media ? I did notice Amazon offers an encoding features and would definitely feel more comfortable using them, but even that seems seems redundant.
I completely understand the cost behind encoding is very real, but I just can’t understand why third-party encoders are so widely accepted.