Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
The pirate bay depuis la Belgique
1er avril 2013, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
Autres articles (77)
-
Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond
5 septembre 2013, parCertains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;
-
Ecrire une actualité
21 juin 2013, parPrésentez les changements dans votre MédiaSPIP ou les actualités de vos projets sur votre MédiaSPIP grâce à la rubrique actualités.
Dans le thème par défaut spipeo de MédiaSPIP, les actualités sont affichées en bas de la page principale sous les éditoriaux.
Vous pouvez personnaliser le formulaire de création d’une actualité.
Formulaire de création d’une actualité Dans le cas d’un document de type actualité, les champs proposés par défaut sont : Date de publication ( personnaliser la date de publication ) (...) -
Le profil des utilisateurs
12 avril 2011, parChaque utilisateur dispose d’une page de profil lui permettant de modifier ses informations personnelle. Dans le menu de haut de page par défaut, un élément de menu est automatiquement créé à l’initialisation de MediaSPIP, visible uniquement si le visiteur est identifié sur le site.
L’utilisateur a accès à la modification de profil depuis sa page auteur, un lien dans la navigation "Modifier votre profil" est (...)
Sur d’autres sites (10728)
-
Error transcoding with FFmpeg : Error : Output format hls is not available
6 mai 2024, par asif mohmdI am using FFmpeg library to transcode a video file into multiple resolutions and create an HLS (HTTP Live Streaming) master playlist.


It takes a video file as input but its does give me the output with HLS playlist.I got a error called "Output format hls is not available". Only the Output directory is creating


I am using FFMpeg 7.0 full build version and also tried older versions and ffmpeg essentials and also tried chocolatey.


if i remove the implementation of HLS from this code.it will create 4 different resolution videos in my output.


Note:I just tried this same code on my friend MAC Book by only changing the setffmpegPath : "ffmpeg.setFfmpegPath("C :\ffmpeg\bin\ffmpeg.exe") ;" to his ffmpeg directory.
Its working perfectly in his mac book


import "dotenv/config";
import * as fs from "fs";
import * as path from "path";
import ffmpeg from "fluent-ffmpeg";
import crypto from "crypto";

ffmpeg.setFfmpegPath("C:\\ffmpeg\\bin\\ffmpeg.exe");

export const FFmpegTranscoder = async (file: any): Promise<any> => {
 try {
 console.log("Starting script");
 console.time("req_time");

 const randomName = (bytes = 32) =>
 crypto.randomBytes(bytes).toString("hex");
 const fileName = randomName();
 const directoryPath = path.join(__dirname, "..", "..", "input");
 const filePath = path.join(directoryPath, `${fileName}.mp4`);

 if (!fs.existsSync(directoryPath)) {
 fs.mkdirSync(directoryPath, { recursive: true });
 }

 const paths = await new Promise<any>((resolve, reject) => {
 fs.writeFile(filePath, file, async (err) => {
 if (err) {
 console.error("Error saving file:", err);
 throw err;
 }
 console.log("File saved successfully:", filePath);

 try {
 const outputDirectoryPath = await transcodeWithFFmpeg(
 fileName,
 filePath
 );
 resolve({ directoryPath, filePath, fileName, outputDirectoryPath });
 } catch (error) {
 console.error("Error transcoding with FFmpeg:", error);
 }
 });
 });
 return paths;
 } catch (e: any) {
 console.log(e);
 }
};

const transcodeWithFFmpeg = async (fileName: string, filePath: string) => {
 const directoryPath = path.join(
 __dirname,
 "..",
 "..",
 `output/hls/${fileName}`
 );

 if (!fs.existsSync(directoryPath)) {
 fs.mkdirSync(directoryPath, { recursive: true });
 }

 const resolutions = [
 {
 resolution: "256x144",
 videoBitrate: "200k",
 audioBitrate: "64k",
 },
 {
 resolution: "640x360",
 videoBitrate: "800k",
 audioBitrate: "128k",
 },
 {
 resolution: "1280x720",
 videoBitrate: "2500k",
 audioBitrate: "192k",
 },
 {
 resolution: "1920x1080",
 videoBitrate: "5000k",
 audioBitrate: "256k",
 },
 ];

 const variantPlaylists: { resolution: string; outputFileName: string }[] = [];

 for (const { resolution, videoBitrate, audioBitrate } of resolutions) {
 console.log(`HLS conversion starting for ${resolution}`);
 const outputFileName = `${fileName}_${resolution}.m3u8`;
 const segmentFileName = `${fileName}_${resolution}_%03d.ts`;

 await new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => {
 ffmpeg(filePath)
 .outputOptions([
 `-c:v h264`,
 `-b:v ${videoBitrate}`,
 `-c:a aac`,
 `-b:a ${audioBitrate}`,
 `-vf scale=${resolution}`,
 `-f hls`,
 `-hls_time 10`,
 `-hls_list_size 0`,
 `-hls_segment_filename ${directoryPath}/${segmentFileName}`,
 ])
 .output(`${directoryPath}/${outputFileName}`)
 .on("end", () => resolve())
 .on("error", (err) => reject(err))
 .run();
 });
 const variantPlaylist = {
 resolution,
 outputFileName,
 };
 variantPlaylists.push(variantPlaylist);
 console.log(`HLS conversion done for ${resolution}`);
 }
 console.log(`HLS master m3u8 playlist generating`);

 let masterPlaylist = variantPlaylists
 .map((variantPlaylist) => {
 const { resolution, outputFileName } = variantPlaylist;
 const bandwidth =
 resolution === "256x144"
 ? 264000
 : resolution === "640x360"
 ? 1024000
 : resolution === "1280x720"
 ? 3072000
 : 5500000;
 ``;
 return `#EXT-X-STREAM-INF:BANDWIDTH=${bandwidth},RESOLUTION=${resolution}\n${outputFileName}`;
 })
 .join("\n");
 masterPlaylist = `#EXTM3U\n` + masterPlaylist;

 const masterPlaylistFileName = `${fileName}_master.m3u8`;

 const masterPlaylistPath = `${directoryPath}/${masterPlaylistFileName}`;
 fs.writeFileSync(masterPlaylistPath, masterPlaylist);
 console.log(`HLS master m3u8 playlist generated`);
 return directoryPath;
};
</void></any></any>

My console.log is :


Starting script
 HLS conversion starting for 256x144
 Error transcoding with FFmpeg: Error: Output format hls is not available
 at C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\node_modules\fluent-ffmpeg\lib\capabilities.js:589:21
 at nextTask (C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\node_modules\async\dist\async.js:5791:13)
 at next (C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\node_modules\async\dist\async.js:5799:13)
 at C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\node_modules\async\dist\async.js:329:20
 at C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\node_modules\fluent-ffmpeg\lib\capabilities.js:549:7
 at handleExit (C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\node_modules\fluent-ffmpeg\lib\processor.js:170:11)
 at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\node_modules\fluent-ffmpeg\lib\processor.js:184:11)
 at ChildProcess.emit (node:events:518:28)
 at ChildProcess.emit (node:domain:488:12)
 at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:294:12) 
</anonymous>

I am using Windows 11 and FFMpeg version 7.0. I repeatedly checked, using CMD commands, that my FFMpeg was installed correctly and confirmed the environment variables path, experimented with various FFMpeg versions, and tried with FFMpeg full build Chocolatey package.


In Command Line its working perfectly :


PS C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\test fmmpeg> ffmpeg -hide_banner -y -i .\SampleVideo_1280x720_30mb.mp4 -vf scale=w=640:h=360:force_original_aspect_ratio=decrease -c:a aac -b:v 800k -c:v h264 -b:a 128k -f hls -hls_time 14 -hls_list_size 0 -hls_segment_filename beach/480p_%03d.ts beach/480p.m3u8
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from '.\SampleVideo_1280x720_30mb.mp4':
 Metadata:
 major_brand : isom
 minor_version : 512
 compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
 creation_time : 1970-01-01T00:00:00.000000Z
 encoder : Lavf53.24.2
 Duration: 00:02:50.86, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 1474 kb/s
 Stream #0:0[0x1](und): Video: h264 (Main) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p(progressive), 1280x720 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 1086 kb/s, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 12800 tbn (default)
 Metadata:
 creation_time : 1970-01-01T00:00:00.000000Z
 handler_name : VideoHandler
 vendor_id : [0][0][0][0]
 Stream #0:1[0x2](und): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, 5.1, fltp, 383 kb/s (default)
 Metadata:
 creation_time : 1970-01-01T00:00:00.000000Z
 handler_name : SoundHandler
 vendor_id : [0][0][0][0]
Stream mapping:
 Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (h264 (native) -> h264 (libx264))
 Stream #0:1 -> #0:1 (aac (native) -> aac (native))
Press [q] to stop, [?] for help
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] using SAR=1/1
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] using cpu capabilities: MMX2 SSE2Fast SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX FMA3 BMI2 AVX2
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] profile High, level 3.0, 4:2:0, 8-bit
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] 264 - core 164 r3190 7ed753b - H.264/MPEG-4 AVC codec - Copyleft 2003-2024 - http://www.videolan.org/x264.html - options: cabac=1 ref=3 deblock=1:0:0 analyse=0x3:0x113 me=hex subme=7 psy=1 psy_rd=1.00:0.00 mixed_ref=1 me_range=16 chroma_me=1 trellis=1 8x8dct=1 cqm=0 deadzone=21,11 fast_pskip=1 chroma_qp_offset=-2 threads=11 lookahead_threads=1 sliced_threads=0 nr=0 decimate=1 interlaced=0 bluray_compat=0 constrained_intra=0 bframes=3 b_pyramid=2 b_adapt=1 b_bias=0 direct=1 weightb=1 open_gop=0 weightp=2 keyint=250 keyint_min=25 scenecut=40 intra_refresh=0 rc_lookahead=40 rc=abr mbtree=1 bitrate=800 ratetol=1.0 qcomp=0.60 qpmin=0 qpmax=69 qpstep=4 ip_ratio=1.40 aq=1:1.00
Output #0, hls, to 'beach/480p.m3u8':
 Metadata:
 major_brand : isom
 minor_version : 512
 compatible_brands: isomiso2avc1mp41
 encoder : Lavf61.1.100
 Stream #0:0(und): Video: h264, yuv420p(progressive), 640x360 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], q=2-31, 800 kb/s, 25 fps, 90k tbn (default)
 Metadata:
 creation_time : 1970-01-01T00:00:00.000000Z
 handler_name : VideoHandler
 vendor_id : [0][0][0][0]
 encoder : Lavc61.3.100 libx264
 Side data:
 cpb: bitrate max/min/avg: 0/0/800000 buffer size: 0 vbv_delay: N/A
 Stream #0:1(und): Audio: aac (LC), 48000 Hz, 5.1, fltp, 128 kb/s (default)
 Metadata:
 creation_time : 1970-01-01T00:00:00.000000Z
 handler_name : SoundHandler
 vendor_id : [0][0][0][0]
 encoder : Lavc61.3.100 aac
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_000.ts' for writing speed=15.5x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_001.ts' for writing speed=17.9x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_002.ts' for writing speed=17.3x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_003.ts' for writing speed=19.4x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_004.ts' for writing speed=19.3x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_005.ts' for writing speed=19.2x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_006.ts' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_007.ts' for writing speed=19.4x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_008.ts' for writing speed=19.5x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_009.ts' for writing speed=19.5x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_010.ts' for writing speed=19.4x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p_011.ts' for writing/A =19.4x
[hls @ 000001ef12482040] Opening 'beach/480p.m3u8.tmp' for writing
[out#0/hls @ 000001ef11d4e880] video:17094KiB audio:2680KiB subtitle:0KiB other streams:0KiB global headers:0KiB muxing overhead: unknown
frame= 4271 fps=485 q=-1.0 Lsize=N/A time=00:02:50.76 bitrate=N/A speed=19.4x
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] frame I:45 Avg QP:10.29 size: 60418
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] frame P:1914 Avg QP:14.53 size: 5582
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] frame B:2312 Avg QP:20.63 size: 1774
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] consecutive B-frames: 22.9% 11.9% 8.6% 56.6%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] mb I I16..4: 15.6% 32.1% 52.2%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] mb P I16..4: 0.3% 3.4% 1.2% P16..4: 20.3% 10.0% 13.1% 0.0% 0.0% skip:51.8%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] mb B I16..4: 0.1% 0.9% 0.4% B16..8: 17.2% 5.6% 2.8% direct: 2.0% skip:71.0% L0:41.5% L1:44.1% BI:14.4%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] final ratefactor: 16.13
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] 8x8 transform intra:58.4% inter:51.7%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] coded y,uvDC,uvAC intra: 86.7% 94.3% 78.8% inter: 12.6% 15.0% 4.5%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] i16 v,h,dc,p: 17% 42% 14% 28%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] i8 v,h,dc,ddl,ddr,vr,hd,vl,hu: 23% 19% 11% 6% 7% 8% 8% 9% 9%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] i4 v,h,dc,ddl,ddr,vr,hd,vl,hu: 23% 18% 12% 6% 9% 9% 8% 8% 7%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] i8c dc,h,v,p: 44% 24% 20% 12%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] Weighted P-Frames: Y:0.0% UV:0.0%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] ref P L0: 78.3% 9.7% 8.8% 3.2%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] ref B L0: 92.5% 6.0% 1.5%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] ref B L1: 97.1% 2.9%
[libx264 @ 000001ef1288ec00] kb/s:819.63
[aac @ 000001ef128f7c80] Qavg: 452.137


When I use the
.on('start', (cmdline) => console.log(cmdline))}code with the-f hlscommand, the error "Output format hls is not available" appears, as previously mentioned. But my Console.log looks like this if I run my code without using-f hlscommand :

Without -f hls command


await new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => {
 ffmpeg(filePath)
 .outputOptions([
 `-c:v h264`,
 `-b:v ${videoBitrate}`,
 `-c:a aac`,
 `-b:a ${audioBitrate}`,
 `-vf scale=${resolution}`,
 
 `-hls_time 10`,
 `-hls_list_size 0`,
 `-hls_segment_filename ${directoryPath}/${segmentFileName}`,
 ])
 .output(`${directoryPath}/${outputFileName}`)
 .on('start', (cmdline) => console.log(cmdline)) 
 .on("end", () => resolve())
 .on("error", (err) => reject(err))
 .run();
});
</void>

Console.log is :


`Starting script
File saved successfully: C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\input\c9fcf43726e617a295b203d5acb7b81658b5f05f80eafc74cee21b053422fef1.mp4
HLS conversion starting for 256x144
ffmpeg -i C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\input\c9fcf43726e617a295b203d5acb7b81658b5f05f80eafc74cee21b053422fef1.mp4 -y -c:v h264 -b:v 200k -c:a aac -b:a 64k -vf scale=256x144 -hls_time 10 -hls_list_size 0 -hls_segment_filename C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\output\hls\c9fcf43726e617a295b203d5acb7b81658b5f05f80eafc74cee21b053422fef1/c9fcf43726e617a295b203d5acb7b81658b5f05f80eafc74cee21b053422fef1_256x144_%03d.ts C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\output\hls\c9fcf43726e617a295b203d5acb7b81658b5f05f80eafc74cee21b053422fef1/c9fcf43726e617a295b203d5acb7b81658b5f05f80eafc74cee21b053422fef1_256x144.m3u8
Error transcoding with FFmpeg: Error: ffmpeg exited with code 2880417800: Unrecognized option 'hls_segment_filename C:\Users\asifa\Desktop\Genius Grid\Transcode-service\output\hls\c9fcf43726e617a295b203d5acb7b81658b5f05f80eafc74cee21b053422fef1/c9fcf43726e617a295b203d5acb7b81658b5f05f80eafc74cee21b053422fef1_256x144_%03d.ts'.
Error splitting the argument list: Option not found`


-
Data Privacy Regulations : Essential Knowledge for Global Business
6 mars, par Daniel CroughIf you run a website that collects visitors’ data, you might be violating privacy regulations somewhere in the world. At last count, over 160 countries have privacy laws — and your customers in those countries know about them.
A recent survey found that 53% of people who answered know about privacy rules in their country and want to follow them. This is up from 46% two years ago. Furthermore, customers increasingly want to buy from businesses they can trust with their data.
That’s why businesses must take data privacy seriously. In this article, we’ll first examine data privacy rules, why we need them, and how they are enforced worldwide. Finally, we’ll explore strategies to ensure compliance and tools that can help.
What are data privacy regulations ?
Let’s first consider data privacy. What is it ? The short answer is individuals’ ability to control their personal information. That’s why we need laws and rules to let people decide how their data is collected, used, and shared. Crucially, the laws empower individuals to withdraw permission to use their data anytime.
The UNCTAD reports that only 13 countries had data protection laws or rules before the 2000s. Many existed before businesses could offer online services, so they needed updating. Today, 162 national laws protect data privacy, half of which emerged in the last decade.
Why is this regulation necessary ?
There are many reasons, but the impetus comes from consumers who want their governments to protect their data from exploitation. They understand that participating in the digital economy means sharing personal information like email addresses and telephone numbers, but they want to minimise the risks of doing so.
Data privacy regulation is essential for :
- Protecting personal information from exploitation with transparent rules and guidelines on handling it securely.
- Implementing adequate security measures to prevent data breaches.
- Enforcing accountability for how data is collected, stored and processed.
- Giving consumers control over their data.
- Controlling the flow of data across international borders in a way that fully complies with the regulations.
- Penalising companies that violate privacy laws.
Isn’t it just needless red tape ?
Data breaches in recent years have been one of the biggest instigators of the increase in data privacy regulations. A list of the top ten data breaches illustrates the point.
# Company Location Year # of Records Data Type 1 Yahoo Global 2013 3B user account information 2 Aadhaar India 2018 1.1B citizens’ ID/biometric data 2 Alibaba China 2019 1.1B users’ personal data 4 LinkedIn Global 2021 700M users’ personal data 5 Sina Weibo China 2020 538M users’ personal data 6 Facebook Global 2019 533M users’ personal data 7 Marriott Int’l Global 2018 500M customers’ personal data 8 Yahoo Global 2014 500M user account information 9 Adult Friend Finder Global 2016 412.2M user account information 10 MySpace USA 2013 360M user account information And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Between November 2005 and November 2015, the US-based Identity Theft Resource Center counted 5,754 data breaches that exposed 856,548,312 records, mainly in that country.
It’s no wonder that citizens worldwide want organisations they share their personal data with to protect that data as if it were their own. More specifically, they want their governments to :
- Protect their consumer rights
- Prevent identity theft and other consumer fraud
- Build trust between consumers and businesses
- Improve cybersecurity measures
- Promote ethical business practices
- Uphold international standards
Organisations using personal data in their operations want to minimise financial and reputational risk. That’s common sense, especially when external attacks cause 68% of data breaches.
The terminology of data privacy
With 162 national laws already in place, the legal space surrounding data privacy grows more complex every day. Michalsons has a list of different privacy laws and regulations in force in significant markets around the world.
Fortunately, there’s plenty of commonality for two reasons : first, all countries want to solve the same problem ; second, those drafting the legislation have adopted much of what other countries have already developed. As a result, the terminology remains almost the same, even when the language changes.
These are the core concepts at play :
Term Definition Access and control Consumers can access, review, edit and delete their data Data protection Organisations must protect data from being stolen or compromised Consumer consent Consumers can grant and withdraw or refuse access to their data Deletion Consumers can request to have their data erased Data breach When the security of data has been compromised Data governance The management of data within an organisation Double opt-in Two-factor authentication to add a layer of confirmation GDPR Governing data privacy in Europe since 2016 Personally identifiable information (PII) Data used to identify, locate, or contact an individual Pseudonymisation Replace personal identifiers with artificial identifiers or pseudonyms Publicly available information Data from official sources, without restrictions on access or use Rectification Consumers can request to have errors in their data corrected Overview of current data privacy legislation
Over three-quarters of the world has formulated and rolled out data privacy legislation — or is currently doing so. Here’s a breakdown of the laws and regulations you can expect to find in most significant markets worldwide.
Europe
Thoughts of protecting data privacy first occurred in Europe when the German government became concerned about automated data processing in 1970. A few years later, Sweden was the first country to enact a law requiring permits for processing personal data, establishing the first data protection authority.
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Sweden’s efforts triggered a succession of European laws and regulations that culminated in the European Union (EU) GDPR, enacted in 2016 and enforced from 25 May 2018. It’s a detailed and comprehensive privacy law that safeguards the personal data and privacy of EU citizens.
The main objectives of GDPR are :
- Strengthening the privacy rights of individuals by empowering them to control their data.
- Establishing a uniform data framework for data privacy across the EU.
- Improving transparency and accountability by mandating businesses to handle personal data responsibly and fully disclose how they use it.
- Extending the regulation’s reach to organisations external to the EU that collect, store and process the data of EU residents.
- Requiring organisations to conduct Protection Impact Assessments (PIAs) for “high-risk” projects.
ePrivacy Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications (PECR)
The second pillar of the EU’s strategy to regulate the personal data of its citizens is the ePrivacy Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications (EU PECR). Together with the GDPR, it will comprise data protection law in the union. This regulation applies to :
- Providers of messaging services like WhatsApp, Facebook and Skype
- Website owners
- Owners of apps that have electronic communication components
- Commercial direct marketers
- Political parties sending promotional messages electronically
- Telecommunications companies
- ISPs and WiFi connection providers
The EU PECR was intended to commence with GDPR on 25 May 2018. That didn’t happen, and as of January 2025, it was in the process of being redrafted.
EU Data Act
One class of data isn’t covered by GDPR or PECR : internet product-generated data. The EU Data Act provides the regulatory framework to govern this data, and it applies to manufacturers, suppliers, and users of IoT devices or related services.
The intention is to facilitate data sharing, use, and reuse and to facilitate organisations’ switching to a different cloud service provider. The EU Data Act entered into force on 11 January 2024 and is applicable from September 2025.
GDPR UK
Before Brexit, the EU GDPR was in force in the UK. After Brexit in 2020, the UK opted to retain the regulations as UK GDPR but asserted independence to keep the framework under review. It’s part of a wider package of reform to the data protection environment that includes the Data Protection Act 2018 and the UK PECR.
In the USA
The primary federal law regarding data privacy in the US is the Privacy Act of 1974, which has been in revision for some time. However, rather than wait for the outcome of that process, many business sectors and states have implemented their own measures.
Sector-specific data protection laws
This sectoral approach to data protection relies on a combination of legislation, regulation and self-regulation rather than governmental control. Since the mid-1990s, the country has allowed the private sector to lead on data protection, resulting in ad hoc legislation arising when circumstances require it. Examples include the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988, the Cable Television Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
California was the first state to act when federal privacy law development stalled. In 2018, it enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) to protect and enforce Californians’ rights regarding the privacy of their personal information. It came into force in 2020.
California Privacy Act (CPRA)
In November of that same year, California voters approved the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA). Billed as the strongest consumer privacy law ever enacted in the US, CPRA works with CCPA and adds the best elements of laws and regulations in other jurisdictions (Europe, Japan, Israel, New Zealand, Canada, etc.) into California’s personal data protection regime.
Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (CDPA)
In March 2021, Virginia became the next US state to implement privacy legislation. The Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA), which is also informed by global legislative developments, tries to strike a balance between consumer privacy protections and business interests. It governs how businesses collect, use, and share consumer data.
Colorado Privacy Act (CPA)
Developed around the same time as VCDPA, the Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) was informed by that law and GDPR and CCPA. Signed into law in July 2021, the CPA gives Colorado residents more control over their data and establishes guidelines for businesses on handling the data.
Other states generally
Soon after, additional states followed suit and, similar to Colorado, examined existing legislation to inform the development of their own data privacy laws and regulations. At the time of writing, the states with data privacy laws at various stages of development were Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, New York, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah.
By the time you read this article, more states may be doing it, and the efforts of some may have led to laws and regulations coming into force. If you’re already doing business or planning to do business in the US, you should do your own research on the home states of your customers.
Globally
Beyond Europe and the US, other countries are also implementing privacy regulations. Some were well ahead of the trend. For example, Chile’s Law on the Protection of Private Life was put on the books in 1999, while Mauritius enacted its first Data Protection Act in 2004 — a second one came along in 2017 to replace it.
Canada
The regulatory landscape around data privacy in Canada is as complicated as it is in the US. At a federal government level, there are two laws : The Privacy Act for public sector institutions and the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) for the private sector.
PIPEDA is the one to consider here. Like all other data privacy policies, it provides a framework for organisations handling consumers’ personal data in Canada. Although not quite up to GDPR standard, there are moves afoot to close that gap.
The Digital Charter Implementation Act, 2022 (aka Bill C-27) is proposed legislation introduced by federal agencies in June 2022. It’s intended to align Canada’s privacy framework with global standards, such as GDPR, and address emerging digital economy challenges. It may or may not have been finalised when you read this.
At the provincial level, three of Canada’s provinces—Alberta, British Columbia, and Quebec—have introduced laws and regulations of their own. Their rationale was similar to that of Bill C-27, so they may become redundant if and when that bill passes.
Japan
Until recently, Japan’s Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) was considered by many to be the most comprehensive data protection law in Asia. Initially introduced in 2003, it was significantly amended in 2020 to align with global privacy standards, such as GDPR.
APPI sets out unambiguous rules for how businesses and organisations collect, use, and protect personal information. It also sets conditions for transferring the personal information of Japanese residents outside of Japan.
China
The new, at least for now, most comprehensive data privacy law in Asia is China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). It’s part of the country’s rapidly evolving data governance framework, alongside the Cybersecurity Law and the Data Security Law.
PIPL came into effect in November 2021 and was informed by GDPR and Japan’s APPI, among others. The data protection regime establishes a framework for protecting personal information and imposes significant compliance obligations on businesses operating in China or targeting consumers in that country.
Other countries
Many other nations have already brought in legislation and regulations or are in the process of developing them. As mentioned earlier, there are 162 of them at this point, and they include :
Argentina Costa Rica Paraguay Australia Ecuador Peru Bahrain Hong Kong Saudi Arabia Bermuda Israel Singapore Brazil Mauritius South Africa Chile Mexico UAE Colombia New Zealand Uruguay Observant readers might have noticed that only two countries in Africa are on that list. More than half of the 55 countries on the continent have or are working on data privacy legislation.
It’s a complex landscape
Building a globalised business model has become very complicated, with so much legislation already in play and more coming. What you must do depends on the countries you plan to operate in or target. And that’s before you consider the agreements groups of countries have entered into to ease the flow of personal data between them.
In this regard, the EU-US relationship is instructive. When GDPR came into force in 2016, so did the EU-US Privacy Shield. However, about four years later, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) invalidated it. The court ruled that the Privacy Shield didn’t adequately protect personal data transferred from the EU to the US.
The ruling was based on US laws that allow excessive government surveillance of personal data transferred to the US. The CJEU found that this conflicted with the basic rights of EU citizens under the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights.
A replacement was negotiated in a new mechanism : the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. However, legal challenges are expected, and its long-term viability is uncertain. The APEC Privacy Framework and the OECD Privacy Framework, both involving the US, also exist.
Penalties for non-compliance
Whichever way you look at it, consumer data privacy laws and regulations make sense. But what’s really interesting is that many of them have real teeth to punish offenders. GDPR is a great example. It was largely an EU concern until January 2022 when the French data protection regulator hit Google and Facebook with serious fines and criminal penalties.
Google was fined €150M, and Facebook was told to pay €60M for failing to allow French users to reject cookie tracking technology easily. That started a tsunami of ever-larger fines.
The largest so far was the €1.2B fine levied by the Irish Data Protection Commission on Meta, the owner of Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp. It was issued for transferring European users’ personal data to the US without adequate data protection mechanisms. This significant penalty demonstrated the serious financial implications of non-compliance.
These penalties follow a structured approach rather than arbitrary determinations. The GDPR defines an unambiguous framework for fines. They can be up to 4% of a company’s total global turnover in the previous fiscal year. That’s a serious business threat.
What should you do ?
For businesses committed to long-term success, accepting and adapting to regulatory requirements is essential. Data privacy regulations and protection impact assessments are here to stay, with many national governments implementing similar frameworks.
However, there is some good news. As you’ve seen, many of these laws and regulations were informed by GDPR or retrospectively aligned. That’s a good place to start. Choose tools to handle your customer’s data that are natively GDPR-compliant.
For example, web analytics is all about data, and a lot of that data is personal. And if, like many people, you use Google Analytics 4, you’re already in trouble because it’s not GDPR-compliant by default. And achieving compliance requires significant additional configuration.
A better option would be to choose a web analytics platform that is compliant with GDPR right off the bat. Something like Matomo would do the trick. Then, complying with any of the tweaks individual countries have made to the basic GDPR framework will be a lot easier—and may even be handled for you.
Privacy-centric data strategies
Effective website data analysis is essential for business success. It enables organisations to understand customer needs and improve service delivery.
But that data doesn’t necessarily need to be tied to their identity — and that’s at the root of many of these regulations.
It’s not to stop companies from collecting data but to encourage and enforce responsible and ethical handling of that data. Without an official privacy policy or ethical data collection practices, the temptation for some to use and abuse that data for financial gain seems too great to resist.
Cookie usage and compliance
There was a time when cookies were the only way to collect reliable information about your customers and prospects. But under GDPR, and in many countries that based or aligned their laws with GDPR, businesses have to give users an easy way to opt out of all tracking, particularly tracking cookies.
So, how do you collect the information you need without cookies ? Easy. You use a web analytics platform that doesn’t depend wholly on cookies. For example, in certain countries and when configured for maximum privacy, Matomo allows for cookieless operation. It can also help you manage the cookie consent requirements of various data privacy regulations.
Choose the right tools
Data privacy regulations have become a permanent feature of the global business landscape. As digital commerce continues to expand, these regulatory frameworks will only become more established. Fortunately, there is a practical approach forward.
As mentioned several times, GDPR is considered by many countries to be a particularly good example of effective data privacy regulation. For that reason, many of them model their own legislation on the EU’s effort, making a few tweaks here and there to satisfy local requirements or anomalies.
As a result, if you comply with GDPR, the chances are that you’ll also comply with many of the other data privacy regulations discussed here. That also means that you can select tools for your data harvesting and analytics that comply with the GDPR out of the box, so to speak. Tools like Matomo.
Matomo lets website visitors retain full control over their data.
Before deciding whether to go with Matomo On-premise or the EU-hosted cloud version, why not start your 21-day free trial ? No credit card required.
-
Grand Unified Theory of Compact Disc
1er février 2013, par Multimedia Mike — GeneralThis is something I started writing about a decade ago (and I almost certainly have some of it wrong), back when compact discs still had a fair amount of relevance. Back around 2002, after a few years investigating multimedia technology, I took an interest in compact discs of all sorts. Even though there may seem to be a wide range of CD types, I generally found that they’re all fundamentally the same. I thought I would finally publishing something, incomplete though it may be.
Physical Perspective
There are a lot of ways to look at a compact disc. First, there’s the physical format, where a laser detects where pits/grooves have disturbed the smooth surface (a.k.a. lands). A lot of technical descriptions claim that these lands and pits on a CD correspond to ones and zeros. That’s not actually true, but you have to decide what level of abstraction you care about, and that abstraction is good enough if you only care about the discs from a software perspective.Grand Unified Theory (Software Perspective)
Looking at a disc from a software perspective, I have generally found it useful to view a CD as a combination of a 2 main components :- table of contents (TOC)
- a long string of sectors, each of which is 2352 bytes long
I like to believe that’s pretty much all there is to it. All of the information on a CD is stored as a string of sectors that might be chopped up into a series of anywhere from 1-99 individual tracks. The exact sector locations where these individual tracks begin are defined in the TOC.
Audio CDs (CD-DA / Red Book)
The initial purpose for the compact disc was to store digital audio. The strange sector size of 2352 bytes is an artifact of this original charter. “CD quality audio”, as any multimedia nerd knows, is formally defined as stereo PCM samples that are each 16 bits wide and played at a frequency of 44100 Hz.
(44100 audio frames / 1 second) * (2 samples / audio frame) * (16 bits / 1 sample) * (1 byte / 8 bits) = 176,400 bytes / second (176,400 bytes / 1 second) / (2352 bytes / 1 sector) = 75
75 is the number of sectors required to store a single second of CD-quality audio. A single sector stores 1/75th of a second, or a ‘frame’ of audio (though I think ‘frame’ gets tossed around at all levels when describing CD formats).
The term “red book” is thrown around in relation to audio CDs. There is a series of rainbow books that define various optical disc standards and the red book describes audio CDs.
Basic Data CD-ROMs (Mode 1 / Yellow Book)
Somewhere along the line, someone decided that general digital information could be stored on these discs. Hence, the CD-ROM was born. The standard model above still applies– TOC and string of 2352-byte sectors. However, it’s generally only useful to have a single track on a CD-ROM. Thus, the TOC only lists a single track. That single track can easily span the entire disc (something that would be unusual for a typical audio CD).While the model is mostly the same, the most notable difference between and audio CD and a plain CD-ROM is that, while each sector is 2352 bytes long, only 2048 bytes are used to store actual data payload. The remaining bytes are used for synchronization and additional error detection/correction.
At least, the foregoing is true for mode 1 / form 1 CD-ROMs (which are the most common). “Mode 1″ CD-ROMs are defined by a publication called the yellow book. There is also mode 1 / form 2. This forgoes the additional error detection and correction afforded by form 1 and dedicates 2336 of the 2352 sector bytes to the data payload.
CD-ROM XA (Mode 2 / Green Book)
From a software perspective, these are similar to mode 1 CD-ROMs. There are also 2 forms here. The first form gives a 2048-byte data payload while the second form yields a 2324-byte data payload.Video CD (VCD / White Book)
These are CD-ROM XA discs that carry MPEG-1 video and audio data.Photo CD (Beige Book)
This is something I have never personally dealt with. But it’s supposed to conform to the CD-ROM XA standard and probably fits into my model. It seems to date back to early in the CD-ROM era when CDs were particularly cost prohibitive.Multisession CDs (Blue Book)
Okay, I admit that this confuses me a bit. Multisession discs allow a user to burn multiple sessions to a single recordable disc. I.e., burn a lump of data, then burn another lump at a later time, and the final result will look like all the lumps were recorded as the same big lump. I remember this being incredibly useful and cost effective back when recordable CDs cost around US$10 each (vs. being able to buy a spindle of 100 CD-Rs for US$10 or less now). Studying the cdrom.h file for the Linux OS, I found a system call named CDROMMULTISESSION that returns the sector address of the start of the last session. If I were to hypothesize about how to make this fit into my model, I might guess that the TOC has some hint that the disc was recorded in multisession (which needs to be decided up front) and the CDROMMULTISESSION call is made to find the last session. Or it could be that a disc read initialization operation always leads off with the CDROMMULTISESSION query in order to determine this.I suppose I could figure out how to create a multisession disc with modern software, or possibly dig up a multisession disc from 15+ years ago, and then figure out how it should be read.
CD-i
This type puzzles my as well. I do have some CD-i discs and I thought that I could read them just fine (the last time I looked, which was many years ago). But my research for this blog post has me thinking that I might not have been seeing the entire picture when I first studied my CD-i samples. I was able to see some of the data, but sources indicate that only proper CD-i hardware is able to see all of the data on the disc (apparently, the TOC doesn’t show all of the sectors on disc).Hybrid CDs (Data + Audio)
At some point, it became a notable selling point for an audio CD to have a data track with bonus features. Even more common (particularly in the early era of CD-ROMs) were computer and console games that used the first track of a disc for all the game code and assets and the remaining tracks for beautifully rendered game audio that could also be enjoyed outside the game. Same model : TOC points to the various tracks and also makes notes about which ones are data and which are audio.There seems to be 2 distinct things described above. One type is the mixed mode CD which generally has the data in the first track and the audio in tracks 2..n. Then there is the enhanced CD, which apparently used multisession recording and put the data at the end. I think that the reasoning for this is that most audio CD player hardware would only read tracks from the first session and would have no way to see the data track. This was a positive thing. By contrast, when placing a mixed-mode CD into an audio player, the data track would be rendered as nonsense noise.
Subchannels
There’s at least one small detail that my model ignores : subchannels. CDs can encode bits of data in subchannels in sectors. This is used for things like CD-Text and CD-G. I may need to revisit this.In Summary
There’s still a lot of ground to cover, like how those sectors might be formatted to show something useful (e.g., filesystems), and how the model applies to other types of optical discs. Sounds like something for another post.
Syndiquer tout le site
