Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/formulaire

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (50)

  • Keeping control of your media in your hands

    13 avril 2011, par

    The vocabulary used on this site and around MediaSPIP in general, aims to avoid reference to Web 2.0 and the companies that profit from media-sharing.
    While using MediaSPIP, you are invited to avoid using words like "Brand", "Cloud" and "Market".
    MediaSPIP is designed to facilitate the sharing of creative media online, while allowing authors to retain complete control of their work.
    MediaSPIP aims to be accessible to as many people as possible and development is based on expanding the (...)

  • Les vidéos

    21 avril 2011, par

    Comme les documents de type "audio", Mediaspip affiche dans la mesure du possible les vidéos grâce à la balise html5 .
    Un des inconvénients de cette balise est qu’elle n’est pas reconnue correctement par certains navigateurs (Internet Explorer pour ne pas le nommer) et que chaque navigateur ne gère en natif que certains formats de vidéos.
    Son avantage principal quant à lui est de bénéficier de la prise en charge native de vidéos dans les navigateur et donc de se passer de l’utilisation de Flash et (...)

  • Websites made ​​with MediaSPIP

    2 mai 2011, par

    This page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.

Sur d’autres sites (7184)

  • avformat/dtsdec : Extend DTS core sync word

    28 avril 2015, par foo86
    avformat/dtsdec : Extend DTS core sync word

    Check extended sync word for 16-bit LE and BE core streams to reduce
    
probability of alias sync detection. Previously sync word extension was
    
checked only for 14-bit streams.
    

    This follows up the similar change in avcodec/dca_parser.
    

    Signed-off-by : Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
    • [DH] libavformat/dtsdec.c

  • Users Flow for Piwik : discover the most popular paths your users take through your website or app

    14 décembre 2016, par InnoCraft — Plugins

    Hi, this is Tom from InnoCraft. The company of the makers of Piwik.

    Do you know how your visitors navigate through your website or app ? Well, we thought we did, but it turned out we didn’t until we actually were able to visualize those paths over several steps in an easy to understand graph. We were really surprised by some paths our users took every day. We discovered new popular pages where we totally under-estimated their importance. We found that many users actually had a problem on our home page so they had to reload it and we improved some popular paths we didn’t expect users were going. Now these paths are much more straight-forward for our users.

    -> Read the rest of the story on the Users Flow Marketplace page.

    What does the new Users Flow report look like ?

    Here is below just a little preview of the Users Flow report. The plugin includes more reports and goodies !

    Where do I get Users Flow ?

    Users Flow is available on the Piwik Marketplace :

    Users Flow is premium plugin for Piwik and comes with our 14 day money back guarantee and 1-click installation & updates (all product updates come for free).

    You can also signup for a free Piwik Cloud-hosted trial to discover the power of Users Flow !

    Happy Analytics,

  • Are there any technical reasons that MP4 is more popular than Webm ?

    1er juin 2019, par dprogramz

    Not looking for opinions. I’m searching for data.

    As it is now, I want to become a webM evangelist. However, I assume there are some actual technical reasons why mp4 is preferred over webm in the bigger picture. I want to know them so I can be accurate in my assessments.

    I’m working on developing a broadcast video messaging graphics engine (think chyron) and using the Chromium engine like OBS does for messaging. So far the results have been excellent.

    One of the best features I’ve found is using webm for video. I should note I am using small (640x480 max) videos as graphics that are on top off a larger full HD video.

    Not only does it seem to have a better compression:quality ratio than mp4 for my use case, the most important thing is that it has full alpha support, which allows for excellent layering of video objects on top of each other in the HTML DOM, in real time, with no noticable performance hits.

    Aside from it’s predecessor, FLV, I can’t think of another high quality, high compression codec that also supports alpha. I feel like you are stuck using pro-res 4444 or the ancient animation codec to reliable distribute video with an alpha.

    So, that said, are there technical reasons why webM isn’t more adopted than mp4 ?

    I already know the obvious, that there is dedicated hardware to decode mp4. But, is there any technicality that would prevent a hardware webM decoder ? I really want to understand more what the benefits of mp4 are over webM, which i assume is why it is more widely used than webM.

    Thanks !

Navigation