
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow
28 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Octobre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Texte
Autres articles (76)
-
(Dés)Activation de fonctionnalités (plugins)
18 février 2011, parPour gérer l’ajout et la suppression de fonctionnalités supplémentaires (ou plugins), MediaSPIP utilise à partir de la version 0.2 SVP.
SVP permet l’activation facile de plugins depuis l’espace de configuration de MediaSPIP.
Pour y accéder, il suffit de se rendre dans l’espace de configuration puis de se rendre sur la page "Gestion des plugins".
MediaSPIP est fourni par défaut avec l’ensemble des plugins dits "compatibles", ils ont été testés et intégrés afin de fonctionner parfaitement avec chaque (...) -
Participer à sa documentation
10 avril 2011La documentation est un des travaux les plus importants et les plus contraignants lors de la réalisation d’un outil technique.
Tout apport extérieur à ce sujet est primordial : la critique de l’existant ; la participation à la rédaction d’articles orientés : utilisateur (administrateur de MediaSPIP ou simplement producteur de contenu) ; développeur ; la création de screencasts d’explication ; la traduction de la documentation dans une nouvelle langue ;
Pour ce faire, vous pouvez vous inscrire sur (...) -
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)
Sur d’autres sites (10864)
-
How to create buffer for video streaming
4 juin 2014, par John SimpsonI am developing a Android video player that can play RTSP Stream. I use ffmpeg in jni part to get and decode RTSP Stream. For now, the player can play and then pause video stream. The next step is to create a buffer for the player so that when user pauses video, the player can still load video stream in the next several seconds.
Is there any good documentation on how to create a buffer for video streaming in proper way ?
My plan is to create a array of packets. When the array is full, the player calls
av_read_pause();
to stop buffering. When the array has spaces, the player will call
av_read_play();
to continue buffering. There is a read_thread for getting packets from the buffer and the decode the packets. The read_thread will stop (resume), when user pauses (resume) video.
Can this plan work ?
-
Anomalie #2240 (Nouveau) : Chaînes de langue manquantes
21 août 2011, par Johan PustochDans la dist : dans rubrique.html, mot.html, recherche.html et modeles/plan.html (chaîne de langue de l’extension breves a priori : ) dans inclure/forum.html, 2 fois. (chaîne de langue de l’extension forum a priori ) Dans lapartie privée : info_email dans (...)
-
VP8 Codec Optimization Update
15 juin 2010, par noreply@blogger.com (John Luther) — inside webmSince WebM launched in May, the team has been working hard to make the VP8 video codec faster. Our community members have contributed improvements, but there’s more work to be done in some interesting areas related to performance (more on those below).
Encoder
The VP8 encoder is ripe for speed optimizations. Scott LaVarnway’s efforts in writing an x86 assembly version of the quantizer will help in this goal significantly as the quantizer is called many times while the encoder makes decisions about how much detail from the image will be transmitted.For those of you eager to get involved, one piece of low-hanging fruit is writing a SIMD version of the ARNR temporal filtering code. Also, much of the assembly code only makes use of the SSE2 instruction set, and there surely are newer extensions that could be made use of. There are also redundant code removal and other general cleanup to be done ; (Yaowu Xu has submitted some changes for these).
At a higher level, someone can explore some alternative motion search strategies in the encoder. Eventually the motion search can be decoupled entirely to allow motion fields to be calculated elsewhere (for example, on a graphics processor).Decoder
Decoder optimizations can bring higher resolutions and smoother playback to less powerful hardware.Jeff Muizelaar has submitted some changes which combine the IDCT and summation with the predicted block into a single function, helping us avoid storing the intermediate result, thus reducing memory transfers and avoiding cache pollution. This changes the assembly code in a fundamental way, so we will need to sync the other platforms up or switch them to a generic C implementation and accept the performance regression. Johann Koenig is working on implementing this change for ARM processors, and we’ll merge these changes into the mainline soon.
In addition, Tim Terriberry is attacking a different method of bounds checking on the "bool decoder." The bool decoder is performance-critical, as it is called several times for each bit in the input stream. The current code handles this check with a simple clamp in the innermost loops and a less-frequent copy into a circular buffer. This can be expensive at higher data rates. Tim’s patch removes the circular buffer, but uses a more complex clamp in the innermost loops. These inner loops have historically been troublesome on embedded platforms.
To contribute in these efforts, I’ve started working on rewriting higher-level parts of the decoder. I believe there is an opportunity to improve performance by paying better attention to data locality and cache layout, and reducing memory bus traffic in general. Another area I plan to explore is improving utilization in the multi-threaded decoder by separating the bitstream decoding from the rest of the image reconstruction, using work units larger than a single macroblock, and not tying functionality to a specific thread. To get involved in these areas, subscribe to the codec-devel mailing list and provide feedback on the code as it’s written.Embedded Processors
We want to optimize multiple platforms, not just desktops. Fritz Koenig has already started looking at the performance of VP8 on the Intel Atom platform. This platform need some attention as we wrote our current x86 assembly code with an out-of-order processor in mind. Since Atom is an in-order processor (much like the original Pentium), the instruction scheduling of all of the x86 assembly code needs to be reexamined. One option we’re looking at is scheduling the code for the Atom processor and seeing if that impacts the performance on other x86 platforms such as the Via C3 and AMD Geode. This is shaping up to be a lot of work, but doing it would provide us with an opportunity to tighten up our assembly code.
These issues, along with wanting to make better use of the larger register file on x86_64, may reignite every assembly programmer’s (least ?) favorite debate : whether or not to use intrinsics. Yunqing Wang has been experimenting with this a bit, but initial results aren’t promising. If you have experience in dealing with a lot of assembly code across several similar-but-kinda-different platforms, these maintainability issues might be familiar to you. I hope you’ll share your thoughts and experiences on the codec-devel mailing list.
Optimizing codecs is an iterative (some would say never-ending) process, so stay tuned for more posts on the progress we’re making, and by all means, start hacking yourself.
It’s exciting to see that we’re starting to get substantial code contributions from developers outside of Google, and I look forward to more as WebM grows into a strong community effort.
John Koleszar is a software engineer at Google.