
Recherche avancée
Médias (91)
-
#3 The Safest Place
16 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#4 Emo Creates
15 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#2 Typewriter Dance
15 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
#1 The Wires
11 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
ED-ME-5 1-DVD
11 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Octobre 2011
Langue : English
Type : Audio
-
Revolution of Open-source and film making towards open film making
6 octobre 2011, par
Mis à jour : Juillet 2013
Langue : English
Type : Texte
Autres articles (106)
-
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir -
Keeping control of your media in your hands
13 avril 2011, parThe vocabulary used on this site and around MediaSPIP in general, aims to avoid reference to Web 2.0 and the companies that profit from media-sharing.
While using MediaSPIP, you are invited to avoid using words like "Brand", "Cloud" and "Market".
MediaSPIP is designed to facilitate the sharing of creative media online, while allowing authors to retain complete control of their work.
MediaSPIP aims to be accessible to as many people as possible and development is based on expanding the (...) -
Création définitive du canal
12 mars 2010, parLorsque votre demande est validée, vous pouvez alors procéder à la création proprement dite du canal. Chaque canal est un site à part entière placé sous votre responsabilité. Les administrateurs de la plateforme n’y ont aucun accès.
A la validation, vous recevez un email vous invitant donc à créer votre canal.
Pour ce faire il vous suffit de vous rendre à son adresse, dans notre exemple "http://votre_sous_domaine.mediaspip.net".
A ce moment là un mot de passe vous est demandé, il vous suffit d’y (...)
Sur d’autres sites (13811)
-
Fix —output-prefix with input-files in sub-directories
29 mai 2018, par orbeaFix —output-prefix with input-files in sub-directories
And make sure to reserve the whole file path when not using —output-prefix.
Fixes https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/463/
Signed-off-by : Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd@mega-nerd.com> -
Can I dynamically call a LGPL/GPL software in my closed-source application ? [closed]
29 juin 2016, par marcggI want to use a tool (ffmpeg) that is under GNU Lesser General Public License, version 2.1 GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 for some components.
To do so, I only call it in my software as such :
System.Diagnostics.Process p = new System.Diagnostics.Process();
p.StartInfo = new System.Diagnostics.ProcessStartInfo("lgplSoftware.exe", myParams);
p.Start();I do not change it, I only use a built version of the software for windows.
Wikipedia says :
A key dispute related to the GPL is
whether or not non-GPL software can be
dynamically linked to GPL libraries.
The GPL is clear in requiring that all
derivative works of code under the GPL
must themselves be under the GPL.
While it is understood that static
linking produces derivative works, it
is not clear whether an executable
that dynamically links to a GPL code
should be considered a derivative work
(see Weak Copyleft). The
free/open-source software community is
split on this issue. The FSF asserts
that such an executable is indeed a
derivative work if the executable and
GPL code "make function calls to each
other and share data structures,"
with certain others agreeing (e.g.
Jerry Epplin), while some (e.g.
Linus Torvalds) agree that dynamic
linking can create derived works but
disagree over the circumstances.
I am really confused by all this legal things. I would have made my project LGPL as well and released the source, but this is not up to me.
So the question is : can I use it like I’m doing right now or will I be executed by an army of lawyers ?
-
huffyuvdec : remove somewhat deprecated code
15 juin 2014, par Christophe Gisquethuffyuvdec : remove somewhat deprecated code
The old code was reserving the 0xFFFF entry to represent an inexisting
entry/codeword. These entries are now detected through their length
being <= 0. As this entry is often used for the residuals (-1,-1), which
should be among the most frequent, it is particularly important to not
reserve it.Signed-off-by : Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>