
Recherche avancée
Autres articles (58)
-
MediaSPIP : Modification des droits de création d’objets et de publication définitive
11 novembre 2010, parPar défaut, MediaSPIP permet de créer 5 types d’objets.
Toujours par défaut les droits de création et de publication définitive de ces objets sont réservés aux administrateurs, mais ils sont bien entendu configurables par les webmestres.
Ces droits sont ainsi bloqués pour plusieurs raisons : parce que le fait d’autoriser à publier doit être la volonté du webmestre pas de l’ensemble de la plateforme et donc ne pas être un choix par défaut ; parce qu’avoir un compte peut servir à autre choses également, (...) -
Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins
27 avril 2010, parMediaspip core
autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs -
Déploiements possibles
31 janvier 2010, parDeux types de déploiements sont envisageable dépendant de deux aspects : La méthode d’installation envisagée (en standalone ou en ferme) ; Le nombre d’encodages journaliers et la fréquentation envisagés ;
L’encodage de vidéos est un processus lourd consommant énormément de ressources système (CPU et RAM), il est nécessaire de prendre tout cela en considération. Ce système n’est donc possible que sur un ou plusieurs serveurs dédiés.
Version mono serveur
La version mono serveur consiste à n’utiliser qu’une (...)
Sur d’autres sites (6011)
-
MediaMetadataRetriever setDataSource failed : status = 0xFFFFFFED
22 février 2016, par darjaI need to fetch frames from video located in the web. That’s how I do this :
class PlayerWrapper {
private static final MediaMetadataRetriever mMediaMetadataRetriever = new MediaMetadataRetriever();
…
public void initPlayback(final Context context, final VideoSurfaceView videoSurface, final String url) {
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
…
try {
mMediaMetadataRetriever.setDataSource(url, new HashMap());
} catch (Exception e) {
DPLog(e);
}
}
}).start();
}
public Bitmap getFrameAt(int positionMillis) {
if (mMediaMetadataRetriever != null) {
DPLog.d("Creating frame for position [%s]", positionMillis);
try {
return mMediaMetadataRetriever.getFrameAtTime(positionMillis * 1000);
} catch (Exception e) {
…
return null;
}
} else {
return null;
}
}
}This works fine on several devices with Android 4.4, 5 and 6. But on one device with Android 4.1.2
setDataSource
function fails with following stack trace :java.lang.RuntimeException: setDataSource failed: status = 0xFFFFFFED
at android.media.MediaMetadataRetriever._setDataSource(MediaMetadataRetriever.java)
at android.media.MediaMetadataRetriever.setDataSource(MediaMetadataRetriever.java:99)
at co.unreel.videoapp.playback.UnreelPlayer$3.run(UnreelPlayer.java:138)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:856)Also tried this code on emulator, got almost the same but with status
0x80000000
Url is got from YouTube API, looks like this :
https://r2---sn-n3toxu-axqe.googlevideo.com/videoplayback?gcr=ru&sver=3&mm=31&mn=sn-n3toxu-axqe&key=yt6&signature=D1CE7B8615F3D96A58A9D2679057D676E7777E05.5A318AD8C5F48FCED2D1A9149348CD269F466FA9&mt=1456173450&pl=24&mv=m&ms=au&lmt=1455616987173757&itag=22&requiressl=yes&ip=188.242.217.203&source=youtube&dur=848.248&id=o-ABIn_CbRwqIO6qpvlaWe_ekyTZPLVd0w_eM80awd6uRQ&fexp=9408087%2C9416126%2C9419451%2C9420452%2C9421340%2C9422596%2C9423661%2C9423662%2C9425078%2C9425963%2C9427767%2C9427801%2C9428013%2C9428432%2C9428660%2C9429602&mime=video%2Fmp4&upn=P5qxGGbPoc0&sparams=dur%2Cgcr%2Cid%2Cinitcwndbps%2Cip%2Cipbits%2Citag%2Clmt%2Cmime%2Cmm%2Cmn%2Cms%2Cmv%2Cpl%2Cratebypass%2Crequiressl%2Csource%2Cupn%2Cexpire&expire=1456195127&initcwndbps=3140000&ratebypass=yes&ipbits=0
Permissions :
Why this can happen and what to do ?
I also tried to use
FFmpegMediaMetadataRetriever
with the same logic, but it doesn’t work at all,setDataSource
causes exceptions with status0xFFFFFFFF
on all devices. As I found on SO, that means that url is invalid, but it is ok and played byMediaPlayer
without any issues. Also I found that ffmpeg has issues with urls longer than 1024, but that’s not my case too.May be there are another way to get frames from video ?
-
MediaMetadataRetriever setDataSource failed : status = 0xFFFFFFED
10 octobre 2019, par darjaI need to fetch frames from video located in the web. That’s how I do this :
class PlayerWrapper {
private static final MediaMetadataRetriever mMediaMetadataRetriever = new MediaMetadataRetriever();
…
public void initPlayback(final Context context, final VideoSurfaceView videoSurface, final String url) {
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
…
try {
mMediaMetadataRetriever.setDataSource(url, new HashMap());
} catch (Exception e) {
DPLog(e);
}
}
}).start();
}
public Bitmap getFrameAt(int positionMillis) {
if (mMediaMetadataRetriever != null) {
DPLog.d("Creating frame for position [%s]", positionMillis);
try {
return mMediaMetadataRetriever.getFrameAtTime(positionMillis * 1000);
} catch (Exception e) {
…
return null;
}
} else {
return null;
}
}
}This works fine on several devices with Android 4.4, 5 and 6. But on one device with Android 4.1.2
setDataSource
function fails with following stack trace :java.lang.RuntimeException: setDataSource failed: status = 0xFFFFFFED
at android.media.MediaMetadataRetriever._setDataSource(MediaMetadataRetriever.java)
at android.media.MediaMetadataRetriever.setDataSource(MediaMetadataRetriever.java:99)
at co.unreel.videoapp.playback.UnreelPlayer$3.run(UnreelPlayer.java:138)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:856)Also tried this code on emulator, got almost the same but with status
0x80000000
Url is got from YouTube API, looks like this :
https://r2---sn-n3toxu-axqe.googlevideo.com/videoplayback?gcr=ru&sver=3&mm=31&mn=sn-n3toxu-axqe&key=yt6&signature=D1CE7B8615F3D96A58A9D2679057D676E7777E05.5A318AD8C5F48FCED2D1A9149348CD269F466FA9&mt=1456173450&pl=24&mv=m&ms=au&lmt=1455616987173757&itag=22&requiressl=yes&ip=188.242.217.203&source=youtube&dur=848.248&id=o-ABIn_CbRwqIO6qpvlaWe_ekyTZPLVd0w_eM80awd6uRQ&fexp=9408087%2C9416126%2C9419451%2C9420452%2C9421340%2C9422596%2C9423661%2C9423662%2C9425078%2C9425963%2C9427767%2C9427801%2C9428013%2C9428432%2C9428660%2C9429602&mime=video%2Fmp4&upn=P5qxGGbPoc0&sparams=dur%2Cgcr%2Cid%2Cinitcwndbps%2Cip%2Cipbits%2Citag%2Clmt%2Cmime%2Cmm%2Cmn%2Cms%2Cmv%2Cpl%2Cratebypass%2Crequiressl%2Csource%2Cupn%2Cexpire&expire=1456195127&initcwndbps=3140000&ratebypass=yes&ipbits=0
Permissions :
Why this can happen and what to do ?
I also tried to use
FFmpegMediaMetadataRetriever
with the same logic, but it doesn’t work at all,setDataSource
causes exceptions with status0xFFFFFFFF
on all devices. As I found on SO, that means that url is invalid, but it is ok and played byMediaPlayer
without any issues. Also I found that ffmpeg has issues with urls longer than 1024, but that’s not my case too.May be there are another way to get frames from video ?
-
Why iFrame is a good idea
15 octobre 2009I’ve seen some hilariously uninformed posts about the new Apple iFrame specification. Let me take a minute to explain what it actually is.
First off, as opposed to what the fellow in the Washington Post writes, it’s not really a new format. iFrame is just a way of using formats that we’ve already know and love. As the name suggests, iFrame is just an i-frame only H.264 specification, using AAC audio. An intraframe version of H.264 eh ? Sounds a lot like AVC-Intra, right ? Exactly. And for exactly the same reasons - edit-ability. Whereas AVC-Intra targets the high end, iFrame targets the low end.
Even when used in intraframe mode, H.264 has some huge advantage over the older intraframe codecs like DV or DVCProHD. For example, significantly better entropy coding, adaptive quantization, and potentially variable bitrates. There are many others. Essentially, it’s what happens when you take DV and spend another 10 years working on making it better. That’s why Panasonic’s AVC-Intra cameras can do DVCProHD quality video at half (or less) the bitrate.
Why does iFrame matter for editing ? Anyone who’s tried to edit video from one of the modern H.264 cameras without first transcoding to an intraframe format has experienced the huge CPU demands and sluggish performance. Behind the scenes it’s even worse. Because interframe H.264 can have very long GOPs, displaying any single frame can rely on dozens or even hundreds of other frames. Because of the complexity of H.264, building these frames is very high-cost. And it’s a variable cost. Decoding the first frame in a GOP is relatively trivial, while decoding the middle B-frame can be hugely expensive.
Programs like iMovie mask that from the user in some cases, but at the expensive of high overhead. But, anyone who’s imported AVC-HD video into Final Cut Pro or iMovie knows that there’s a long "importing" step - behind the scenes, the applications are transcoding your video into an intraframe format, like Apple Intermediate or ProRes. It sort of defeats one of the main purposes of a file-based workflow.
You’ve also probably noticed the amount of time it takes to export a video in an interframe format. Anyone who’s edited HDV in Final Cut Pro has experienced this. With DV, doing an "export to quicktime" is simply a matter of Final Cut Pro rewriting all of the data to disk - it’s essentially a file copy. With HDV, Final Cut Pro has to do a complete reencode of the whole timeline, to fit everything into the new GOP structure. Not only is this time consuming, but it’s essentially a generation loss.
iFrame solves these issues by giving you an intraframe codec, with modern efficiency, which can be decoded by any of the H.264 decoders that we already know and love.
Having this as an optional setting on cameras is a huge step forward for folks interested in editing video. Hopefully some of the manufacturers of AVC-HD cameras will adopt this format as well. I’ll gladly trade a little resolution for instant edit-ability.