
Recherche avancée
Médias (91)
-
Les Miserables
9 décembre 2019, par
Mis à jour : Décembre 2019
Langue : français
Type : Textuel
-
VideoHandle
8 novembre 2019, par
Mis à jour : Novembre 2019
Langue : français
Type : Video
-
Somos millones 1
21 juillet 2014, par
Mis à jour : Juin 2015
Langue : français
Type : Video
-
Un test - mauritanie
3 avril 2014, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2014
Langue : français
Type : Textuel
-
Pourquoi Obama lit il mes mails ?
4 février 2014, par
Mis à jour : Février 2014
Langue : français
-
IMG 0222
6 octobre 2013, par
Mis à jour : Octobre 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
Autres articles (73)
-
Websites made with MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parThis page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.
-
Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond
5 septembre 2013, parCertains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;
-
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)
Sur d’autres sites (11250)
-
Anomalie #2020 : Rendre optionnelles les extensions
8 juin 2011, par guytarr °Bon, à présent ça me parait peu réaliste de vouloir un spip fonctionnel sans extensions. Par contre, si certaines sont nécessaires, d’autres devraient être vraiment optionnelles. Je pense notamment à breves, sites, petitions, mots, organiseur, grenier, squelettes_par_rubrique, statistiques... Or, (...)
-
Anomalie #2020 (Nouveau) : Rendre optionnelles les extensions
4 avril 2011, par Guy CesaroSans extensions, on a certaines erreurs qui me paraissent évitables : Les boucles forums et documents dans les modèles du privé devraient prendre le ? pour boucler sur des tables absentes sans erreur, elles n’en marcheraient pas moins bien lorsque l’extension est là. ex : Il manque un (...)
-
New cookie behaviour in browsers may cause regressions
24 février 2020, par Matomo Core Team — Community, DevelopmentLast year the Chromium browser team announced they would change their default behaviour for cookies. In particular about a property called
samesite
. Over the last few months, we have made various changes to our cookie handling to get Matomo ready for this. Depending on your setup and the features you use, some things may not work anymore.You can avoid most of the issues by using HTTPS on your Matomo, and ideally also use HTTPS on your website(s).
If you are not running the latest version of Matomo yet (3.13.3 at the time of writing), then we highly recommend that you upgrade as soon as possible. Previous versions are not compatible with these cookie browser changes.
Opt out screen
If you embed the opt out screen on your website running on HTTP, there is a chance the Matomo opt out no longer works. In these cases it may still work over http:
- when the privacy policy page that embeds the opt out screen (via iframe) also has the Matomo JavaScript tracker embedded,
- and when both the opt out and the JS tracker point to the same Matomo installation.
In other cases when HTTP is used, the opt out feature will likely be broken.
We recommend you test whether the opt out on your site still works by opening your privacy policy page in an incognito browser window. Then test to opt out of tracking, and then reload the page. If the checkbox “You are not opted out. Uncheck this box to opt out.” is still ticked, then your opt out is not working.
If the opt out is not working anymore, it is most likely due to HTTP being used. In that case you should change the opt out URL to HTTPS. For example change from
<iframe src=”<strong>http://</strong>…”
to<iframe src=”<strong>https://</strong>...”
. If your Matomo doesn’t support HTTPS yet, you will need to contact your webhoster or system administrator to get SSL enabled on your Matomo domain.JavaScript tracker
In most cases, everything related to the JavaScript Tracker will still work as expected.
But there is an edge case : when you are also reading Matomo’s cookie server side. You may be affected by this edge case issue when :
- you track part of the user behaviour in the browser (using Matomo JS Tracker),
- and also track user behavior in your server (for example using one of Matomo SDKs in PHP, Java, Python, C#, etc.).
In that case, for you to still be able to read the so-called
visitorId
on your server, we recommend you add this line to your JS tracking code :_paq.push([‘setSecureCookie’, location.protocol === 'https:']);
The cookie can be only retrieved if your website is loaded through HTTPS.
Should you have any questions, or notice anything isn’t working as expected, please visit our forum.
Third party cookies
If you are using third party cookies, using HTTPS on your Matomo is now a requirement to make them work across different domains. Otherwise Chrome and in the near future other browsers would not accept the cookie. If you don’t know if you are using third party cookies or first party cookies, you’re likely using first party cookies and this does not affect you.