Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (6479)

• Revision 32858 : on vire ce .foucs() qui "force le scroll" vers l’input du formulaire au ...

  12 novembre 2009, par brunobergot@… — Log

  on vire ce .foucs() qui "force le scroll" vers l’input du formulaire au chargement de la page

• Video files conversion/transcoding Google App Engine

  15 août 2013, par Vasilis

  I want to start a cloud computing project with the simple task to :

  1. Receive uploaded video files
  2. Do some transcoding / converting to them
  3. Allow user to download / stream the generated file

  I was thinking ffmpeg as an external command line tool integrated in a Java/Google App engine Application. Since it was fairly hard to be assured about the limitations of the framework, can someone tell me if this is feasible ?

  Thank you in advance !

• More Cinepak Madness

  20 octobre 2011, par Multimedia Mike — Codec Technology

  Fellow digital archaeologist Clone2727 found a possible fifth variant of the Cinepak video codec. He asked me if I cared to investigate the sample. I assured him I wouldn’t be able to die a happy multimedia nerd unless I have cataloged all possible Cinepak variants known to exist in the wild. I’m sure there are chemistry nerds out there who are ecstatic when another element is added to the periodic table. Well, that’s me, except with weird multimedia formats.

  Background
  Cinepak is a video codec that saw widespread use in the early days of digital multimedia. To date, we have cataloged 4 variants of Cinepak in the wild. This distinction is useful when trying to write and maintain an all-in-one decoder. The variants are :

  1. The standard type : Most Cinepak data falls into this category. It decodes to a modified/simplified YUV 4:2:0 planar colorspace and is often seen in AVI and QuickTime/MOV files.
  2. 8-bit greyscale : Essentially the same as the standard type but with only a Y plane. This has only been identified in AVI files and is distinguished by the file header’s video bits/pixel field being set to 8 instead of 24.
  3. 8-bit paletted : Again, this is identified by the video header specifying 8 bits/pixel for a Cinepak stream. There is essentially only a Y plane in the data, however, each 8-bit value is a palette index. The palette is transported along with the video header. To date, only one known sample of this format has even been spotted in the wild, and it’s classified as NSFW. It is also a QuickTime/MOV file.
  4. Sega/FILM CPK data : Sega Saturn games often used CPK files which stored a variant of Cinepak that, while very close the standard Cinepak, couldn’t be decoded with standard decoder components.

  So, a flexible Cinepak decoder has to identify if the file’s video header specified 8 bits/pixel. How does it distinguish between greyscale and paletted ? If a file is paletted, a custom palette should have been included with the video header. Thus, if video bits/pixel is 8 and a palette is present, use paletted ; else, use greyscale. Beyond that, the Cinepak decoder has a heuristic to determine how to handle the standard type of data, which might deviate slightly if it comes from a Sega CPK file.

  The Fifth Variant ?
  Now, regarding this fifth variant– the reason this issue came up is because of that aforementioned heuristic. Basically, a Cinepak chunk is supposed to store the length of the entire chunk in its header. The data from a Sega CPK file plays fast and loose with this chunk size and the discrepancy makes it easy to determine if the data requires special handling. However, a handful of files discovered on a Macintosh game called “The Journeyman Project : Pegasus Prime” have chunk lengths which are sometimes in disagreement with the lengths reported in the containing QuickTime file’s stsz atom. This trips the heuristic and tries to apply the CPK rules against Cinepak data which, aside from the weird chunk length, is perfectly compliant.

  Here are the first few chunk sizes, as reported by the file header (stsz atom) and the chunk :

  size from stsz = 7880 (0x1EC8) ; from header = 3940 (0xF64)
  size from stsz = 3940 (0xF64) ; from header = 3940 (0xF64)
  size from stsz = 15792 (0x3DB0) ; from header = 3948 (0xF6C)
  size from stsz = 11844 (0x2E44) ; from header = 3948 (0xF6C)
  

  Hey, there’s a pattern here. If they don’t match, then the stsz size is an even multiple of the chunk size (2x, 3x, or 4x in my observation). I suppose I could revise the heuristic to state that if the stsz size is 2x, 3x, 4x, or equal to the chunk header, qualify it as compliant Cinepak data.

  Of course it feels impure, but software engineering is rarely about programmatic purity. A decade of special cases in the FFmpeg / Libav codebases are a testament to that.

  What’s A Variant ?
  Suddenly, I find myself contemplating what truly constitutes a variant. Maybe this was just a broken encoder program making these files ? And for that, I assign it the designation of distinct variation, like some sort of special, unique showflake ?

  Then again, I documented Magic Carpet FLIC as being a distinct variant of the broader FLIC format (which has an enormous number of variants as well).