Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (7547)

• How to convert rtmp hevc video stream to srt av1 endpoint with ffmpeg ?

  20 juin 2024, par Lulík

  i want use ffmpeg to listen rtmp stream and send to srt endpoint.

  


  Flow : smartphone (camera) -> laptop (ffmpeg script) -> desktop (obs studio)

  


  ffmpeg script show warning message and in obs stuido i can see any video only audio.

  


  Thank you in advance.

  


  Console output while running script (error in the end is bcs i stoped sending data from phone) :

  


  ffmpeg version git-2024-06-20-8d6014d Copyright (c) 2000-2024 the FFmpeg developers
  built with gcc 12 (Debian 12.2.0-14)
  configuration: --enable-libsvtav1 --enable-libsrt
  libavutil      59. 24.100 / 59. 24.100
  libavcodec     61.  8.100 / 61.  8.100
  libavformat    61.  3.104 / 61.  3.104
  libavdevice    61.  2.100 / 61.  2.100
  libavfilter    10.  2.102 / 10.  2.102
  libswscale      8.  2.100 /  8.  2.100
  libswresample   5.  2.100 /  5.  2.100
Input #0, flv, from 'rtmp://192.168.0.194/s/streamKey':
  Duration: 00:00:00.00, start: 0.000000, bitrate: N/A
  Stream #0:0: Video: hevc (Main), yuv420p(tv, smpte170m/bt470bg/smpte170m), 1080x1920, 10240 kb/s, 30 fps, 120 tbr, 1k tbn
  Stream #0:1: Audio: aac (LC), 44100 Hz, stereo, fltp, 131 kb/s
Stream mapping:
  Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (hevc (native) -> av1 (libsvtav1))
  Stream #0:1 -> #0:1 (aac (native) -> mp2 (native))
Press [q] to stop, [?] for help
Svt[info]: -------------------------------------------
Svt[info]: SVT [version]:   SVT-AV1 Encoder Lib 595a874
Svt[info]: SVT [build]  :   GCC 12.2.0   64 bit
Svt[info]: LIB Build date: Jun 20 2024 14:25:08
Svt[info]: -------------------------------------------
Svt[info]: Number of logical cores available: 12
Svt[info]: Number of PPCS 76
Svt[info]: [asm level on system : up to avx2]
Svt[info]: [asm level selected : up to avx2]
Svt[info]: -------------------------------------------
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: main profile   tier (auto) level (auto)
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: width / height / fps numerator / fps denominator       : 1080 / 1920 / 120 / 1
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: bit-depth / color format                   : 8 / YUV420
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: preset / tune / pred struct                    : 10 / PSNR / random access
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: gop size / mini-gop size / key-frame type          : 641 / 16 / key frame
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: BRC mode / rate factor                     : CRF / 35 
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: AQ mode / variance boost                   : 2 / 0
Svt[info]: -------------------------------------------
Svt[warn]: Failed to set thread priority: Invalid argument
Output #0, mpegts, to 'srt://192.168.0.167:9998?mode=caller':
  Metadata:
    encoder         : Lavf61.3.104
  Stream #0:0: Video: av1, yuv420p(tv, smpte170m/bt470bg/smpte170m, progressive), 1080x1920, q=2-31, 120 fps, 90k tbn
      Metadata:
        encoder         : Lavc61.8.100 libsvtav1
  Stream #0:1: Audio: mp2, 44100 Hz, stereo, s16, 384 kb/s
      Metadata:
        encoder         : Lavc61.8.100 mp2
[mpegts @ 0x55ec921d9540] Stream 0, codec av1, is muxed as a private data stream and may not be recognized upon reading.
[in#0/flv @ 0x55ec9219cc40] Error during demuxing: Input/output error1990.7kbits/s speed=0.967x    
[out#0/mpegts @ 0x55ec922247c0] video:4431KiB audio:1138KiB subtitle:0KiB other streams:0KiB global headers:0KiB muxing overhead: 6.374870%
frame=  723 fps= 31 q=35.0 Lsize=    5923KiB time=00:00:24.12 bitrate=2011.3kbits/s speed=1.04x


  


  I send video stream from mobile app over rtmp encoded with hevc to my laptop where running script ffmpeg -f flv -listen 1 -i rtmp://192.168.0.194/s/streamKey -c:v libsvtav1 -f mpegts srt://192.168.0.167:9998?mode=caller. On the desktop i have obs with media source input srt://192.168.0.167:9998?mode=listener.

  


  When i run ffmpeg script without video codec option (-c:v libsvtav1) its working fine and in obs i can see video from my phone camera. With the option i can not see video only audio.
I clearly dont understand warning message : [mpegts @ 0x55ec921d9540] Stream 0, codec av1, is muxed as a private data stream and may not be recognized upon reading..
Do I need specify codec (av1) in obs media source or my ffmpeg script is wrong ?

  


• Google Analytics 4 (GA4) vs Universal Analytics (UA)

  24 janvier 2022, par Erin — Analytics Tips

  March 2022 Update : It’s official ! Google announced that Universal Analytics will no longer process any new data as of 1 July 2023. Google is now pushing Universal Analytics users to switch to the latest version of GA – Google Analytics 4. 

  Currently, Google Analytics 4 is unable to accept historical data from Universal Analytics. Users need to take action before July 2022, to ensure they have 12 months of data built up before the sunset of Universal Analytics

  So how do Universal Analytics and Google Analytics 4 compare ? And what alternative options do you have ? Let’s dive in. 

  In this blog, we’ll cover :

  What is Google Analytics 4 ? 

  In October 2020, Google launched Google Analytics 4, a completely redesigned analytics platform. This follows on from the previous version known as Universal Analytics (or UA).

  Amongst its touted benefits, GA4 promises a completely new way to model data and even the ability to predict future revenue. 

  However, the reception of GA4 has been largely negative. In fact, some users from the digital marketing community have said that GA4 is awful, unusable and so bad it can bring you to tears.

  

  

  Google Analytics 4 vs Universal Analytics

  There are some pretty big differences between Google Analytics 4 and Universal Analytics but for this blog, we’ll cover the top three.

  1. Redesigned user interface (UI)

  GA4 features a completely redesigned UI to Universal Analytics’ popular interface. This dramatic change has left many users in confusion and fuelled some users to declare that “most of the time you are going round in circles to find what you’re looking for.”

  

  2. Event-based tracking

  Google Analytics 4 also brings with it a new data model which is purely event-based. This event-based model moves away from the typical “pageview” metric that underpins Universal Analytics.

  3. Machine learning insights

  Google Analytics 4 promises to “predict the future behavior of your users” with their machine-learning-powered predictive metrics. This feature can “use shared aggregated and anonymous data to improve model quality”. Sounds powerful, right ?

  Unfortunately, it only works if at least 1,000 returning users triggered the relevant predictive condition over a seven-day period. Also, if the model isn’t sustained over a “period of time” then it won’t work. And according to Google, if “the model quality for your property falls below the minimum threshold, then Analytics will stop updating the corresponding predictions”.

  This means GA4’s machine learning insights probably won’t work for the majority of analytics users.

  Ultimately, GA4 is just not ready to replace Google’s Universal Analytics for most users. There are too many missing features.

  What’s missing in Google Analytics 4 ?

  Quite a lot. Even though it offers a completely new approach to analytics, there are a lot of key features and functions missing in GA4.

  Behavior Flow

  The Behavior Flow report in Universal Analytics helps to visualise the path users take from one page or Event to the next. It’s extremely useful when you’re looking for quick and clear insight. But it no longer exists in Google Analytics 4, and instead, two new overcomplicated reports have been introduced to replace it – funnel exploration report and path exploration report.

  The decision to remove this critical report will leave many users feeling disappointed and frustrated. 

  Limitations on custom dimensions

  You can create custom dimensions in Google Analytics 4 to capture advanced information. For example, if a user reads a blog post you can supplement that data with custom dimensions like author name or blog post length. But, you can only use up to 50, and for some that will make functionality like this almost pointless.

  Machine learning (ML) limitations

  Google Analytics 4 promises powerful ML insights to predict the likelihood of users converting based on their behaviors. The problem ? You need 1,000 returning users in one week. For most small-medium businesses this just isn’t possible.

  And if you do get this level of traffic in a week, there’s another hurdle. According to Google, if “the model quality for your property falls below the minimum threshold, then GA will stop updating the corresponding predictions.” To add insult to injury Google suggests that this might make all ML insights unavailable. But they can’t say for certain… 

  Views

  One cornerstone of Universal Analytics is the ability to configure views. Views allow you to set certain analytics environments for testing or cleaning up data by filtering out internal traffic, for example. 

  Views are great for quickly and easily filtering data. Preset views that contain just the information you want to see are the ideal analytics setup for smaller businesses, casual users, and do-it-yourself marketing departments.

  

  There are a few workarounds but they’re “messy [,] annoying and clunky,” says a disenfranchised Redditor.

  Another helpful Reddit user stumbled upon an unhelpful statement from Google. Google says that they “do not offer [the views] feature in Google Analytics 4 but are planning similar functionality in the future.” There’s no specific date yet though.

  Bounce rate

  Those that rely on bounce rate to understand their site’s performance will be disappointed to find out that bounce rate is also not available in GA4. Instead, Google is pushing a new metric known as “Engagement Rate”. With this metric, Google now uses their own formula to establish if a visitor is engaged with a site.

  Lack of integration

  Currently, GA4 isn’t ready to integrate with many core digital marketing tools and doesn’t accept non-Google data imports. This makes it difficult for users to analyse ROI and ROAS for campaigns measured in other tools. 

  Content Grouping

  Yet another key feature that Google has done away with is Content Grouping. However, as with some of the other missing features in GA4, there is a workaround, but it’s not simple for casual users to implement. In order to keep using Content Grouping, you’ll need to create event-scoped custom dimensions.

  Annotations 

  A key feature of Universal Analytics is the ability to add custom Annotations in views. Annotations are useful for marking dates that site changes were made for analysis in the future. However, Google has removed the Annotations feature and offered no alternative or workaround.

  Historical data imports are not available

  The new approach to data modelling in GA4 adds new functionality that UA can’t match. However, it also means that you can’t import historical UA data into GA4. 

  Google’s suggestion for this one ? Keep running UA with GA4 and duplicate events for your GA4 property. Now you will have two different implementations running alongside each other and doing slightly different things. Which doesn’t sound like a particularly streamlined solution, and adds another level of complexity.

  Should you switch to Google Analytics 4 ?

  So the burning question is, should you switch from Universal Analytics to Google Analytics 4 ? It really depends on whether you have the available resources and if you believe this tool is still right for your organisation. At the time of writing, GA4 is not ready for day-to-day use in most organisations.

  If you’re a casual user or someone looking for quick, clear insights then you will likely struggle with the switch to GA4. It appears that the new Google Analytics 4 has been designed for enterprise-scale businesses with large internal teams of analysts.

  

  Unfortunately, for most casual users, business owners and do-it-yourself marketers there are complex workarounds and time-consuming implementations to handle. Ultimately, it’s up to you to decide if the effort to migrate and relearn GA is worth it.

  Right now is the best time to draw the line and make a decision to either switch to GA4 or look for a better alternative to Google Analytics.

  Google Analytics alternative

  Matomo is one of the best Google Analytics alternatives offering an easy to use design with enhanced insights on our Cloud, On-Premise and on Matomo for WordPress solutions. 

  

  Matomo is an open-source analytics solution that provides a comprehensive, user-friendly and compliance-focused alternative to both Google Analytics 4 and Universal Analytics.

  The key benefits of using Matomo include :

  • Easy to use – Matomo provides a simpler interface and understandable KPIs. See for yourself with our live demo. 
  • Compliance – Future-proof your tech stack for looming privacy regulations. Matomo covers all of your ePrivacy, GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, and PECR data compliance requirements. 
  • Data privacy and ownership – Your analytics data is 100% yours to own, with no external parties looking in.
  • Flexible, all-in-one solution – Get features like A/B Testing, Heatmaps, Session Recordings, SEO Web Vitals, Tag Manager, Media Analytics, Search Engine Keyword Performance, custom reports and much more. 
  • Integrations galore – Expand your Matomo capabilities by adding integrations from over 100 leading technologies.

  Plus, unlike GA4, Matomo will accept your historical data from UA so you don’t have to start all over again. Check out our 7 step guide to migrating from Google Analytics to find out how.

  Getting started with Matomo is easy. Check out our live demo and start your free 21-day trial. No credit card required.

  In addition to the limitations and complexities of GA4, there are many other significant drawbacks to using Google Analytics.

  Google’s data ethics are a growing concern of many and it is often discussed in the mainstream media. In addition, GA is not GDPR compliant by default and has resulted in 200k+ data protection cases against websites using GA.

  What’s more, the data that Google Analytics actually provides its end-users is extrapolated from samples. GA’s data sampling model means that once you’ve collected a certain amount of data Google Analytics will make educated guesses rather than use up its server space collecting your actual data. 

  The reasons to switch from Google Analytics are rising each day. 

  Wrap up

  The now required update to GA4 will add new layers of complexity, which will leave many casual web analytics users and marketers wondering if there’s a better way. Luckily there is. Get clear insights quickly and easily with Matomo – start your 21-day free trial now.

• Consent Mode v2 : Everything You Need to Know

  7 mai 2024, par Alex — Analytics Tips

  Confused about Consent Mode v2 and its impact on your website analytics ? You’re not the only one. 

  Google’s latest update has left many scratching their heads about data privacy and tracking. 

  In this blog, we’re getting straight to the point. We’ll break down what Consent Mode v2 is, how it works, and the impact it has.

  What is Consent Mode ?

  What exaclty is Google Consent Mode and why is there so much buzz surrounding it ? This question has been frustrating analysts and marketers worldwide since the beginning of this year. 

  Consent Mode is the solution from Google designed to manage data collection on websites in accordance with user privacy requirements.

  This mode enables website owners to customise how Google tags respond to users’ consent status for cookie usage. At its core, Consent Mode adheres to privacy regulations such as GDPR in Europe and CCPA in California, without significant loss of analytical data.

  

  How does Consent Mode work ?

  Consent Mode operates by adjusting the behaviour of tags on a website depending on whether consent for cookie usage is provided or not. If a user does not consent to the use of analytical or advertising cookies, Google tags automatically switch to collecting a limited amount of data, ensuring privacy compliance.

  This approach allows for continued valuable insights into website traffic and user behavior, even if users opt out of most tracking cookies.

  What types of consent are available in Consent Mode ?

  As of 6 March 2024, Consent Mode v2 has become the current standard (and in terms of utilising Google Advertising Services, practically mandatory), indicating the incorporation of four consent types :

  1. ad_storage : allows for the collection and storage of data necessary for delivering personalised ads based on user actions.
  2. ad_user_data : pertains to the collection and usage of data that can be associated with the user for ad customisation and optimisation.
  3. ad_personalization : permits the use of user data for ad personalisation and providing more relevant content.
  4. analytics_storage : relates to the collection and storage of data for analytics, enabling websites to analyse user behaviour and enhance user experience.

  Additionally, in Consent Mode v2, there are two modes :

  1. Basic Consent Mode : in which Google tags are not used for personalised advertising and measurements if consent is not obtained.
  2. Advanced Consent Mode : allows Google tags to utilise anonymised data for personalised advertising campaigns and measurements, even if consent is not obtained.

  What is Consent Mode v2 ? (And how does it differ from Consent Mode v1 ?)

  Consent Mode v2 is an improved version of the original Consent Mode, offering enhanced customisation capabilities and better compliance with privacy requirements. 

  The new version introduces additional consent configuration parameters, allowing for even more precise control over which data is collected and how it’s used. The key difference between Consent Mode v2 and Consent Mode v1 lies in more granular consent management, making this tool even more flexible and powerful in safeguarding personal data.

  In Consent Mode v2, the existing markers (ad_storage and analytics_storage) are accompanied by two new markers :

  1. ad_user_data – does the user agree to their personal data being utilized for advertising purposes ?
  2. ad_personalization – does the user agree to their data being employed for remarketing ?

  In contrast to ad_storage and analytics_storage, these markers don’t directly affect how the tags operate on the site itself. 

  They serve as additional directives sent alongside the pings to Google services, indicating how user data can be utilised for advertising purposes.

  While ad_storage and analytics_storage serve as upstream qualifiers for data (determining which identifiers are sent with the pings), ad_user_data and ad_personalization serve as downstream instructions for Google services regarding data processing.

  How is the implementation of Consent Mode v2 going ?

  The implementation of Consent Mode v2 is encountering some issues and bugs (as expected). The most important thing to understand :

  1. Advanced Consent Mode v2 is essential if you have traffic and campaigns with Google Ads in the European Union.
  2. If you don’t have substantially large traffic, enabling Advanced Consent Mode v2 will likely result in a traffic drop in GA4 – because this version of consent mode (unlike the basic one) applies behavioural modelling to users who haven’t accepted the use of cookies. And modelling the behaviour requires time.

  The aspect of behavioural modelling in Consent Mode v2 implies the following : the data of users who have declined tracking options begin to be modelled using machine learning. 

  However, training the model requires a suitable data volume. As the Google’s documentation states :

  The property should collect at least 1,000 events per day with analytics_storage=’denied’ for at least 7 days. The property should have at least 1,000 daily users submitting events with analytics_storage=’granted’ for at least 7 of the previous 28 days.

  Largely due to this, the market’s response to the Consent Mode v2 implementation was mixed : many reported a significant drop in traffic in their GA4 and Google Ads reports upon enabling the Advanced mode. Essentially, a portion of the data was lost because Google’s models lacked enough data for training. 

  And from the very beginning of implementation, users regularly report about a few examples of that scenario. If your website doesn’t have enough traffic for behaviour modelling, after Consent Mode v2 switching you will face significant drop in your traffic in Google Ads and GA4 reports. There are a lot of cases of observing 90-95% drop in metrics of users and sessions.

  In a nutshell, you should be prepared for significant data losses if you are planning to switch to Google Consent Mode v2.

  How does Consent Mode v2 impact web analytics ? 

  The transition to Consent Mode v2 alters the methods of user data collection and processing. The main concerns arise from the potential loss of accuracy and completeness of analytical data due to restrictions on the use of cookies and other identifiers when user consent is absent. 

  With Google Consent Mode v2, the data of visitors who have not agreed to tracking will be modelled and may not accurately reflect your actual visitors’ behaviours and actions. So as an analyst or marketer, you will not have true insights into these visitors and the data acquired will be more generalised and less accurate.

  Google Consent Mode v2 appears to be a kind of compromise band-aid solution. 

  It tries to solve these issues by using data modelling and anonymised data collection. However, it’s critical to note that there are specific limitations inherent to the modelling mechanism.

  This complicates the analysis of visitor behavior, advertising campaigns, and website optimisation, ultimately impacting decision-making and resulting in poor website performance and marketing outcomes.

  Wrap up

  Consent Mode v2 is a mechanism of managing Google tag operations based on user consent settings. 

  It’s mandatory if you’re using Google’s advertising services, and optional (at least for Advanced mode) if you don’t advertise on Google Ads. 

  There are particular indications that this technology is unreliable from a GDPR perspective. 

  Using Google Consent Mode will inevitably lead to data losses and inaccuracies in its analysis. 

  In other words, it in some sense jeopardises your business.